Greens
I am Danny DeVito
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2011
- Messages
- 16,459
- Reaction score
- 804
- Points
- 103
It is astounding how this always becomes a Clintons' fault.
You can't deny that Bill has blood on his hands here.
It is astounding how this always becomes a Clintons' fault.
http://money.cnn.com/2017/11/10/media/sinclair-tribune-merger/index.htmlI thought there was some sort of regulatory rule that one of Trump's cronies repealed that has allowed Sinclair to really go aggressive?
Launched out of Baltimore in 1971, Sinclair has ballooned into a juggernaut that owns or operates nearly 200 TV stations. The merger with Tribune would bring that number to 233, making the company the nation's largest broadcaster with a reach of 72% of U.S. households, though Sinclair would need to sell some of those licenses in order to comply with the FCC's nationwide TV ownership limits.
Bolstering the prospects of the deal: a rule change approved by the FCC in April that loosened those same limits.
You can't deny that Bill has blood on his hands here.
The leading author of the bill was Ed Markey, who is a Democrat.Correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't the bill authored by a Republican, and then passed through a Republican controlled House, and Senate? Clinton, of course could have vetoed it, but the Democrats are almost as beholden to their corporate overlords as the Republicans.
Exactly. And it's also why AM radio is mainly Conservative Talk. Before 1996, it was a lot more diverse, but the Cross Ownership rules and regulations of 1975 were deregulated with the 1996 bill that was put into effect by Bill Clinton.I've hated the Telecom Act of 1996 for years. It killed off two of my favorite local independent radio stations and is the reason every radio station has the same playlist of your corporate favorites. I figured they'd just buy all the stations so they could ram the next pop star down everyone's throats, but this is far worse. Once Net Neutrality is gone they can start choking off the little guys on the internet as well.
yup good luck getting any such legislation with 3rd way Neo Libs like Ed Markey in both ChambersThe 1996 telecommunications act paved the way for this. Oh, well. The genie's out of the bottle as far as vast cross-country ownership of individual media outlets. it would take an act of Congress to take things back to pre-1980s rules on this front.
The leading author of the bill was Ed Markey, who is a Democrat.
The Congress shall have Power...To coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin, and fix the Standard of Weights and Measures;
I am two things: a staunch progressive and an employee of a Sinclair Broadcast Group. I've been working with them for about 5 years after they bought our station from COX Media Group. I am a Creative Director of the station now.
As a staff member, I can tell you that Sinclair is a top down, corporate environment that is cut throat and that doesn't value it's employees enough. That being said.... this situation with the "must runs" is overblown. Like every other local station, we produce hours of news content every day, and Sinclair asks us to run something like 4-5 minutes of must runs a day... if that. And we can place them (right now) wherever we deem best. Most stations place the must runs overnight, where they are truly not going to hurt anybody.
As a liberal and someone who really cares about journalism, I hate Sinclair's right wing stance, and I wish they'd just buy stations and allow the locals to run the stations as needed. That being said, we need to keep this in context. The folks at my building are not too happy at the idea that folks believe Sinclair is deciding our content. They aren't. Day to day, our producers are choosing the stories that they think are best.
That being said, there are a whole lot of reasons why local news is absolute garbage. I just put this at like 7 or 8 on the list. It's something we should be vigilant about, but it's not top down propaganda at this point. At least not as far as I've seen.
Man... that Lionel video is just cringeworthy bad. Like... do you really need 6 minutes to make the simple point that the script isn't offensive? It was 6 minutes of him trying to say, "I'm so smart, you wouldn't understand.." and he doesn't even seem to get the issue.
He's so flabbergasted by this proposed irony that he found, that he totally fails to see the irony of a multimillion dollar media conglomerate warning of the dangers of slanted, opinionated news... as they literally push slanted, opinionated news.
The 2nd video is actually okay... and basically reiterates what I was saying. This really ins't a Sinclair issue.. it's a media conglomerate issue. If folks are worried about the credibility of their local newscasts, then there are more troubling signs to look for than corporate must-runs from Sinclair. Just saying.
In regard to us being a democratic republic, and that we should be referenced as such.... okay... seems like a weird thing to get upset over. I guess I don't really care.
...leftist city... uh huh.
did anyone suggest that?Bill Clinton paved the way for Fox News!?