So, was there racist subtext or not?

Willowhugger

Civilian
Joined
Nov 19, 2004
Messages
484
Reaction score
0
Points
11
By which, subtext, I mean that the film can be interpreted as racist by people looking for it. This is different from accusing Frank Miller and his compatriot of being racists.

Frank, we know, loves to play with archetypes and ideas. Sin City is his taking the Noir world and then slamming down a bunch of amphetamines in writing it. The result being that everything is Noir to the 11.

300 is pretty similar to this. It takes the original Epic myth/history about the Battle and then amps up the hatred, dehumanization, power, and glory of all the characters involved until it resembles effectively Epic Fantasy Noir.

Let's face it, the Ancient Greeks were a huge bunch of racists and the various interpretations of the legends over the years aren't exactly the most favorable things in the world. It's like Gunga Din, ironically, since that was actually a PROGRESSIVE in its time because it was about how it was just that ONNEEEEE group of radical Indian nationalists that were complete ***holes as opposed to the entire race.

For me, I think that Frank's adaptation could easily be construed as offensive because of a lot of the choices here. That doesn't actually mean that anything should have been changed oddly enough. It actually reminds me of Starship Troopers in a way. Verhoven's adaptation throws in the occasional reminder "You know, these people are stark raving nuts right?"

For me, Frank Millar's novels are always best because the writer is fully aware that his heroes are a bunch of nutbars. Ronin's hero is
a ******ed computer nerd that rebuilds his body
that goes on a killing spree of decidedly dubious morality.

In the case of the Spartans, they're a hyper macho bunch of people that are just as off their rocker as the Persians (but mildly more sympathetic). I mean, let's face it, when dealing with baby killers who abandon their children to fight wolves....audience sympathy may be gained but they're not playing with a full deck.

Part of the fun of 300 is the fact that we get to view pure machismo on display, warts and all. While there's plenty of people who want to go back to an age of 'when men were men' and 'women were women' we actually get a society so far removed from our values that its just pure theatre.

There's plenty to admire about the Spartans but its wrong to think that Frank isn't displaying the excessive attitudes of hate, body worship, bloodthirst, sexism, homophobia, and more for the audience.

But mostly its about the ninja death ;-)
 
The Persians were mostly black and brown in this film cause thats how they are in the book.
 
The Persians were mostly black and brown in this film cause thats how they are in the book.

Yeah.

and Frank Millar is the Executive Producer.

I'm hardly complaining about the artistic choices that the movie makers decided on. I'm merely asking whether anyone thought there was any racial subtext in the book/movie and what you thought of it.

Opinion point neutral.
 
There was nothing racist about this movie.
The Persians looked how they would've looked back then.
 
There was nothing racist about this movie.
The Persians looked how they would've looked back then.

Actually, Persians are pretty light skinned.

This army would presumably come from....actually, I have no idea where the army presumably came from.

It's like a bunch of Carthagians immigrated to Persia to form it.
 
Wait, were the Persians in the movie (other than the emissary) black?
I only saw Xerses (who was light-skinned) and the other Persians in armor or light-skinned as well.
 
History is racist.

Ok.
Well, the film wasn't trying to seriously be racist, or put it out there by saying "Hey, look! Those Persians are some dark b!tches."

With that reason, I don't believe that the film was racist (trying to seriously put it out there that there it was white people vs. darker skinned people).
 
Wait, were the Persians in the movie (other than the emissary) black?
I only saw Xerses (who was light-skinned) and the other Persians in armor or light-skinned as well.

well technically since the Persian Kingdom conquered a substantial amount of the known world at the time, it wouldn't be surprising to see Asians and Africans among the Persians

Persians usually have light skin, dark hair, and dark eyes...but i did see some Persians with blue eyes
 
Ok.
Well, the film wasn't trying to seriously be racist, or put it out there by saying "Hey, look! Those Persians are some dark b!tches."

With that reason, I don't believe that the film was racist (trying to seriously put it out there that there it was white people vs. darker skinned people).

it's not just that but the fact that many of the Persians we did see had horribly disfigured faces and resembled some monstrous creatures instead of humans..against the good-looking Spartan army..that is pretty racist

regardless, i still enjoyed the movie
 
it's not just that but the fact that many of the Persians we did see had horribly disfigured faces and resembled some monstrous creatures instead of humans..against the good-looking Spartan army..that is pretty racist

regardless, i still enjoyed the movie

OHH.
I thought we were seriously talking about skin color, because I thought that that was pretty silly.

Well, the movie was based on a graphic novel which was very loosely adapted from Battle of Thermopylae, not the actual Battle of Thermopylae. People losing their cool over this and signing petitions need to get over it.

What's next?
Spider-Man is racist because it wasn't an Asian guy as Peter Parker, but was a white guy?
 
The deformed members of Persia weren't black or arab were they?

But personally, I'm quite glad they went this route. Better than having the Persians white too so then the movie is 100% white. So we got Black and Arab looking Persians.

Oh and back to the deformed part. If you're wondering why Persia had deformed people and Sparta didn't, was because Sparta throws away any babies that aren't near perfect!
 
Ok heres a idea. THE ENTIRE FRICKIN HUMAN ARMY IN THE LORD OF THE RINGS WAS WHITE!!!!!!! WHY IS THAT THEY B!TCH ABOUT THIS MOVIE BUT NOT THAT ONE??? Uh Gandalf the white?? The entire army of Sauron wore black. Most of the orcs are black skinned. But nothing against them. But here because of history this movie is targeted. people are such idiots.
 
it's not just that but the fact that many of the Persians we did see had horribly disfigured faces and resembled some monstrous creatures instead of humans..against the good-looking Spartan army..that is pretty racist

regardless, i still enjoyed the movie

Well when I saw the disfigured beings I thought "wow - that is one ugly mofo", not "wow - that is one ugly black mofo" or even "wow - where is my white hood".

The over the top disfiguration led to the mythological aspect of the telling of the story. The Good Guys (since this is a Spartan story, Spartan mythology) were perfect while evil was superficially as ugly as their actions.
 
it's not just that but the fact that many of the Persians we did see had horribly disfigured faces and resembled some monstrous creatures instead of humans..against the good-looking Spartan army..that is pretty racist

regardless, i still enjoyed the movie
In both the book and movie (though more so in the book), the story is intended to be pro-Spartan propaganda told by Dilios to rally Spartan troops. In the book, Dilios was telling the story to a group of soldiers at a Spartan camp before a battle, and in the movie Dilios is telling the story to the Spartan council to convince them to go to war.
It's supposed to be pro-Spartan, making them into god-like, flawless ideal warriors while the Persians are greedy, disgusting, cowardly monsters.
Nowhere in the book or movie are the Spartans or Spartan culture criticized or made to look, “bad.” Parts of the Spartan culture were brutal, barbaric and at times inhuman, though in 300 they’re shown as glorious and essential.
Nowhere in the book or movie are the Persians shown as heroic. Nowhere is their culture celebrated, and their people are always monstrous. There’s never even a tiny hint that the Persians or the Persian culture are in any way redeemable or something to aspire to.
I think it’s very disingenuous to label this movie in any way “racist” if you understand the point of it at all. It’s propaganda! It doesn’t matter if, instead of Persians, it were Romans or Trojans or Athenians or whoever, they would have still been nasty, cowardly and sub-human.
It’s not about race, it’s not about who they were or where they came from. All that mattered was that they were fighting Spartans, and a proud Spartan was telling the story to rally more proud Spartans.
 
In both the book and movie (though more so in the book), the story is intended to be pro-Spartan propaganda told by Dilios to rally Spartan troops. In the book, Dilios was telling the story to a group of soldiers at a Spartan camp before a battle, and in the movie Dilios is telling the story to the Spartan council to convince them to go to war.
It's supposed to be pro-Spartan, making them into god-like, flawless ideal warriors while the Persians are greedy, disgusting, cowardly monsters.
Nowhere in the book or movie are the Spartans or Spartan culture criticized or made to look, “bad.” Parts of the Spartan culture were brutal, barbaric and at times inhuman, though in 300 they’re shown as glorious and essential.
Nowhere in the book or movie are the Persians shown as heroic. Nowhere is their culture celebrated, and their people are always monstrous. There’s never even a tiny hint that the Persians or the Persian culture are in any way redeemable or something to aspire to.
I think it’s very disingenuous to label this movie in any way “racist” if you understand the point of it at all. It’s propaganda! It doesn’t matter if, instead of Persians, it were Romans or Trojans or Athenians or whoever, they would have still been nasty, cowardly and sub-human.
It’s not about race, it’s not about who they were or where they came from. All that mattered was that they were fighting Spartans, and a proud Spartan was telling the story to rally more proud Spartans.

It's still racist. A more appropriate phrase to describe it would be "intentionally racist".
 
I actually didn't want to see the movie at first, I was like "A bunch of white folks killing black folks... I can pop in Roots or tapes from the Civil Rights Movement" but my friend (also black) convinced me it was no big deal, and I went anyway... I enjoyed it, immensely, but the idea that the vast majority of Persias army was black with a few masked asians disfigured whoknowswhats and persians sprinkled in did get my attention. On the one hand it's like "Man, those African's must have been pretty awesome if the whole Persian army was made up of them" but on the other hand it was like "Kill all the blackies!"

I found it to be an unexplainable artistic choice, save for the idea of helping black actors get their foot in the door ("I was the spinning head guy!") though well executed... the alleged racism in question was self depreciating enough so that I wasn't actually offended, as mentioned before, the Spartans weren't playing with a full deck... so it was kinda like... indiscriminate killing, y'know?

I don't know... for people who pretend to be colorblind, and get offended when other people aren't colorblind, perhaps they'd prefer no one notice patterns like this, but for me... i found it prevalent enough to be noticed, noticable enough to be commented upon, but it doesn't seem like something that came from a position of hate, or left an impression of inherent inferiority...
 
There was nothing racist about this movie.
The Persians looked how they would've looked back then.
Do these people look African

folk1.jpg
3958_2
43039224_l.jpg


These are Greeks now!

laura_mouriki.jpg


korina_stergiadou.jpg
4.jpg

koutsis.jpg
 
IMO, Xerxes appearance is much cooler than Leonidas. Leonidas looks more like Osama bin Laden. :)
 
Well when I saw the disfigured beings I thought "wow - that is one ugly mofo", not "wow - that is one ugly black mofo" or even "wow - where is my white hood".

The over the top disfiguration led to the mythological aspect of the telling of the story. The Good Guys (since this is a Spartan story, Spartan mythology) were perfect while evil was superficially as ugly as their actions.

Pretty much, like the priests and the hunchback, that's the way I saw it. I didn't see them as a race of people, just an evil army.
 
Most audiences didn't care that the villians were black or dark. To them it was just cool to watch Spartans kick ass. But I'm sure white supremacists love this movie even more than they love LOTR. The whole time I was watching I was thinking "damn this is a white supremacist's ideal movie."

Despite that I still enjoyed the movie. It was refreshing to see a Hollywood movie that wasn't the same lazy, paint-by-the-numbers approach.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"