Man, Marvel is just curb-stomping DC in terms of market share!
How do you own the rights to Superman, BATMAN, Wonder Woman, Green Lantern, etc., and STILL only come in at #2 month after month?
Dan Didio needs to be impeached.![]()
Man, Marvel is just curb-stomping DC in terms of market share!
How do you own the rights to Superman, BATMAN, Wonder Woman, Green Lantern, etc., and STILL only come in at #2 month after month?
Dan Didio needs to be impeached.![]()
I wonder whether ASM 600 will top Thor 600 and/or Hulk 600 and Cap 600. Not to mention whatever Blackest Night & Batman events are out there.
Much as I dont like BND, its a good thing that sales arent terrible. Poor sales dont do Spidey any good. The Powers That Be may think that he is broken beyond repair and do something...foolish.
DC have been behind Marvel in terms of share for decades.
Why do you think DC is so insistant on "reviving" the silver age with dumb gimmicks like bringing the Barry Allen Flash back to life after being dead for 20+ years, and bringing back the campy 60's hijinx of Batman and Robin through Dick Grayson and Damian Wayne? They're not happy with being behind Marvel's sales, so they're looking backward to a time period where they weren't-- and are completely forgetting that the reason WHY Marvel started passing DC was because DC didn't keep up with the times. Setting DC comics back by 40 years isn't the answer, nor is displacing Bruce Wayne an Wally West from their rightful positions as Batman and The Flash, respectively.
It is nothing like the comics in the 60's. That's just the way Frank Quitely's artwork is. You should read All Star Superman. And maybe actually read the dialogue in Batman and Robin. There is nothing camp about it.
Anyway...back on topic...
wiki said:Camp is an aesthetic sensibility wherein something is appealing because of its bad taste and ironic value. When the usage appeared, in 1909, it denoted: ostentatious, exaggerated, affected, theatrical, effeminate, and homosexual behaviour, and, by the middle of the 1970s, the definition comprised: banality, artifice, mediocrity, and ostentation so extreme as to have perversely sophisticated appeal. [1] American writer Susan Sontag's essay “Notes on ‘Camp’ ” (1964) emphasised its key elements as: artifice, frivolity, naïve middle-class pretentiousness, and ‘shocking’ excess.
I think it depends on how you're defining camp. Here's what wiki says:
I read through the first issue of Batman and Robin, and campy wouldn't have been the first thing to come to my mind either. And I don't know if the word "camp" is an appropriate description of a coloring or art technique. But to each their own. It's just semantics.
He's talking about the style of art and colors, not necessarily the story or dialogue.
It's really ditko-jack kirby-60s esque. I love it.
He's not insulting it by calling Campy. I'm sure if he saw some Marcos Martin art he would call it campy-like as well.
Alot of people say that, and considering how ditko influenced and created much of the Spidey universe. That a good thing
Jeez you guys are so quick to defend things sometimes....
Haha, quick to defend things? I'm not the police force for the Batman and Robin book. It's just my humble opinion that I don't see the "camp" in the Batman and Robin book. Grant Morrison and Frank Quitely have a very distinct style when they work together on a book. As I said...see their All Star Superman run.
I was just confused as to why he would refer to it as camp. As iloveclones posted the definition of camp...yes...the Batman and Robin MOVIE was camp...heh.t:
If someone doesn't want to like a book. They don't have to.
Wkipedia is great (if you take it with a grain of salt). I work in a lab, and you would be surprised how often wiki ends up being my starting point when I'm stuck, or starting something new.