terry78
My name is Stefan, sweet thang
- Joined
- Mar 8, 2004
- Messages
- 88,379
- Reaction score
- 8,391
- Points
- 203
Last edited:
The only thing Netflix films get nominated for are Razzies anyway![]()
Netflix has gotten slack for their recent films lately, but they also written checks for:
Beasts of No Nation
Mudbound
Okja
New Scorsese project
Saved Annihilation from the scissors cut studio machine.
Them snobs can live in the past.
A movie is a movie is a movie. Whatever qualifies one should qualify all. At the end of the day the Oscars (and Spielberg) need to adapt to modern filmmaking and filmgoing habits. If Netflix/Amazon etc is the future, why wouldn't you want to get on board?
Yeah that's stupid. A movie is a movie whether it is shown on the big screen or little screen. If it is good then it's good.
The only thing Netflix films get nominated for are Razzies anyway![]()
It's a silly argument IMO. Sometimes the big Oscar winners or nominees were barely even in theaters or only had limited theatrical runs. So what qualifies really? If they meet the Academy's requirements and have some showings in theaters to justify the nomination process, then they have met the requirements.
Also, here's my other problem with what Spielberg said. A lot of the Academy voters don't even go to see these films in theaters! They are allowed to watch them on screeners. That's ridiculous. If that has to be a rule for Netflix features, then I want a rule that all Academy voters have to go to a theater for films that are eligible for votes.
It's a silly argument IMO. Sometimes the big Oscar winners or nominees were barely even in theaters or only had limited theatrical runs. So what qualifies really? If they meet the Academy's requirements and have some showings in theaters to justify the nomination process, then they have met the requirements.
Also, here's my other problem with what Spielberg said. A lot of the Academy voters don't even go to see these films in theaters! They are allowed to watch them on screeners. That's ridiculous. If that has to be a rule for Netflix features, then I want a rule that all Academy voters have to go to a theater for films that are eligible for votes.
I think The Irishman has the potential to be the line in the sand. If Marty absolutely pushes for theatrical release and gets it to qualify for Oscar considerations, streaming will lose this battle for validity for a long time to come. If the movie doesn't get played in any theater and there's uproar that it is better than whatever wins Best Picture, or Best Director, or any other award, than I think we're looking at the same effect The Dark Knight had in 2008. It's March Madness, so I'll liken it to the 1974 ACC championship, and the direct effect that had on forcing the NCAA to allow more than one team per conference into the tournament.
Since we're still ahead of that tipping point and all we have right now is debate and conjecture, I'll just say that I agree with Stephen. I believe in film as a theatrical medium, and would like to see that preserved for as long as possible. It's going to change, however, so I also don't see the sense in being ******** about giving nontheatrical mediums their due.
Man some of these old guard types are salty as hell about these streaming companies.
Most of them will bend the knee eventually because places like Netflix and Amazon are willing to put up cash for riskier mid-budget movies the major studios no longer want to bankroll.
The movie industry got overly protective and threatened by television as well back in the day.