• Xenforo is upgrading us to version 2.3.7 on Thursday Aug 14, 2025 at 01:00 AM BST. This upgrade includes several security fixes among other improvements. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

Starship Troopers: Marauder w/Casper Van Dien

First Review


http://www.moviehole.net/?p=13801


Colonel Johnny Rico (Casper Van Dien) is back busting bugs in the highly-anticipated sequel – as far as I’m concerned, that “Hero of the Federation” thing, starring Richard Burgi, doesn’t count – to Paul Verhoeven’s political satire, “Starship Troopers”.

In this one, Rico teams with some old friends to defeat bugs on a distant planet know only as OM-1. Jolene Blalock (the sexy Vulcan from “Enterprise”) plays a soldier pal, joining Rico on the mission.

And I’ll save the rest of the synopsis to the DVD sleeve.

They’ll sell five execs’ homes to finance a ****ty remake of ‘’Prom Night’’, possibly even price-tag their own mothers to get another ‘’Resident Evil’’ movie off the ground (look for some old bats for sale come ’09, I hear the studio’s keen to reanimate that Milla Jovovich series), but they’re only willing to give the makers of the groundbreaking 90s fave ‘’Starship Troopers’’ (1997) a few bucks and food stamps to make a sequel to it? Makes about as much sense as hiring a hunky stripper for Jodie Foster’s 40th birthday. Someone needs to check the water over there at Sony – me thinks it’s tainted.

If there’s anything wrong with “Starship Troopers: Marauder” – and there isn’t much wrong with it, not as far as the performances and the script goes anyway - it’s not the fault of the filmmakers – the direction is great, the script is tight, the acting (Casper Van Dien is Johnny Rico again!) is on par with the first film, and the tone is pitch-perfect (a welcome mesh of spoofery and black humour). It’s Sony that deserves to take the hit.

I can see the meeting now.

Exec #1 : “Starship Troopers? Wasn’t that like ten years ago now?”
Exec #2 : “Hmm. Yeah. Old enough to just remake it! Let’s see what Orlando Bloom’s doing!”
Director Ed Neumeier : “No, please, No. We think the audience would much rather see a straight-up sequel to the first film. We really do”.
Exec #1 : “With who in it? Casper Van Dien? The chick-with-the-**** from the reality series?”
Director Ed Neumeier : “Yes, Casper Van Dien would be in it. And we’d return the series to it’s roots – a real piss-take of the political climate and so on. Paul would approve, too. I know it!”
Exec #2 : “Tell you what. We’ll give you $140 million to remake the first film – get Brett Ratner to direct, Bloom and Jessica Biel to star – or, er, whatever I’ve got in my pocket, to do this sequel of yours. With Casper”.

The main problem with the film is that - and I know a lot of direct-to-video sequels suffer from the same problem, but this one didn’t have to, not with the following this series has (did Sony even look up how much the original film has made them on DVD!) – it feels, well, too small. Not even half-as-epic as the first film. That’s either because there was not enough money to “open up the canvas” of the film, or because the effects budget had been slashed significantly in the development phase. Both don’t help matters. With the bugs looking like left-over props from a lesser-budgeted indy film (OK, they’re not that bad – but they definitely needed work) and the shooting locale seemingly restricted to the one quadrangle, it slightly deters enjoyment of the film. (And though it doesn’t matter too much, it would seem that the character of Dix Hauser was a late addition – possibly the result of Neil Patrick Harris turning down the chance to reprise his character from the original?).

As I said though, that’s about the only thing that doesn’t work about the movie - how small it feels.

Everyone and everything else have done their best here - they’ve dripped sweat in trying to give fans what they needed (and didn’t get last time around). Ed Neumeier has returned the franchise to it’s comic-y roots… serving up plenty of humorous gags, lots of (sometimes not so dazzling) action, and a tone so sorely missed in the last direct-to-video sequel. The best element of the film though is Casper Van Dien – returning (he skipped the last one) as the hero of the original film, Johnny Rico. It’s clear that Van Dien has a love for this series, because he’s giving it his all – he delivers his lines with passion and oomph (”Come on you apes, you wanna live forever? !”), throws himself (literally) into the battle scenes, and generally gets about like an excited kid in a playground. He makes the movie. Van Dien doesn’t get enough credit - he really is a good little actor. He has the makings of an action hero. Love this guy.

I generally had a good time with this film – you could tell that everyone behind-the-camera and in-front of was having the time of their life, but more so, determined to give fans of the series the “Starship Troopers” sequel they should’ve got first-time around. For the most part, they succeeded.

“Marauder” reminded me a lot of the pilot for the “Blade” TV series – which I enjoyed - mainly in its execution. Like [the theatrically released] “Blade Trinity”, the second “Starship Troopers” film totally missed the point – and sorely lacked the fun factor – but with this one (and the “Blade” series), even with less money to throw around, there’s a much more engaging tale in tow. Seems everyone involved knew that they were really lacking the funds so put even more effort into making sure they had a strong storyline and some wonderful actors.

With so much going right for the film, it’s just a pity Sony couldn’t have – many studios, when they see an early cut of the film, and are generally pleased with what they say, throw more money at the filmmakers to improve it – offered up a few more bucks to brush up those effects and pay for some re-shoots. They could’ve cut in some nice epic scenes that’d make it feel less like a could’ve-been-great and more like a this-is-great. Oh well… (maybe they’ll give them more dough for the next one?!)

To Ed, Casper… and everyone else involved… well done! You guys rocked this as good as you could’ve, considering the limitations! To those that didn’t believe in another “ST” sequel…. Let you slip down the porch tomorrow morning.

More on this closer to its release.
 
It's a shame they didn't give the production a little more money, but I trust Clint. I can't wait for this.
 
I hope this is like Dusk Till Dawn 3: The Hangman's Daughter...for me at least.

I thought the second one sucked but the third was at the very least, a decent film to go along with the original in the Dawn series.

I like how they seem to be using the mech suits from the novel plus having Van Dien back is cool. He's not a good actor but at least it's the main character from the original.
 
Thanks. :up:

I'm interested to see the end of that second clip, with the group being "herded" by the bugs.
 
jus watched it.

budget: reminded me of the 2nd movie. Began weak, but the budget seemed to improve a little as the movie progressed.

Story: good, but man, who was the crack pot who imagined that finale. Horrible, I mean a Halo of marauders? Someone had a brainfart all over the film.

Casting was flaming horrible. Casper: Great, Blalock: Great, and hot, Black General: OK, but every other character in the movie (except maybe the so called evil admiral) was played by a hack. You could do better casting at a local high school. I mean come on, the German girl with fantastic ****, but a horrible accent and inability to act. Had she been walking around for the whole movie butt naked, I might be more forgiving.
 
The dialogue in the first 30 minutes or so was so bad it was so ****ing bad that it makes the second movie look good & this movie would have been alot better with Carl & Carmen back. When Rico is united with Lola your like wtf are they talking about they were lame rip offs of Carmen & Carl. It did not get good until Rico was sentenced to hang & I agree about that last half. It was ****ing ****ty as hell. The last half should have focused more on Rico getting the squad together instead of what it did focus on. The last half was terrible not even the robots could save it. This last half makes Batman Begins last half look good & we did not see any boobs until Ricos new squad suited up for the robots. Your still awesome Casper but damn the first one is still the best Trooper movie
 
also: Blalock. She's hilarious I think. She's the most solid as far as acting goes after Casper. But you can see as the movie progresses into idiocy, her acting begins to fail her... especially when things get ******edly ridiculous. I don't know if it's because her acting is limited, or because the scenes were insanely stupid
 
it wasnt that bad a lot better than the second one, yes it got sorta corny at the end but it was good for a DTV 7/10
 
All I wanna know is, Do we see any good **** in this?
 
there is a scene where the marauder suad has to in a room naked ot be synergized with the marauder suits . definately some good boobage in that scene and cant remember if there was more.

this movie was definately a step in the right direction . i thinkis its relatively ok for something that went stv
 
Okay, I picked this up the other day and am watching it now and I gotta say, I'm loving it thus far. Sure, the effects blow due to the low budget, and the acting is like a corny B movie, but that is part of the charm.

The social satire of the first movie is back and kicks ass in this one (It's a good day to die :lmao: This Sky Marshall is hillarious).

My only criticism of this movie is one of my biggest criticisms of the second movie. Like the Dax character in SST2 felt like just a cheap ripoff of Zim because they couldn't get Clancy Brown...Lola feels like a poor man's Carmen (Hell, Balock even looks like Denise Richards) and Hauser feels like a poor man's Carl. Even the relationships between the characters match up. I'd rather they just recast the characters than create new ones with the exact same back stories.
 
Does it live up to the first one and surpass the crappy second one?
 
As to your first question, no, but only because they didn't have the budget to make it as good as the first one (and no Jake Busey, there's no reason they couldn't afford Jake Busey. He works for thirty bucks and two meals for godsakes! :cmad:).

As for your second question, hell yes. Ten times better (and this is coming from someone who liked the second one).

Its good...not great...but good (though I'm only half way through).
 
The first one was decent while the second was **** I'm gonna skip this one.
 
:lmao: This ending is hillariously corny. The blue vail over the flight attendent, the Johnny Rico as God symbolism at the end.

"God's back...and he's a citizen too!" :lmao:

This movie was gloriously bad, it has a Snakes On A Plane charm to it. It is definitely back on form with the first movie? Is it great? Hell no. Is it bad? Hell yes. Does it work? You bet your ass it does.
 
This film would have been better without
the Marauders. In fact the whole end plot was bad. I like the idea of a giant brainer brain bug...but did it have to talk????!??!!
The clip that comes on afterwards was awesome though...
The replacements for doogie houser and that bond chick were okay, but the film suffered for not having the originals. Definately needed a bigger budget. The SFX were pretty bad. And that chicks accent in the begginging...man, so annoying!
I loved the original Starship Troopers so much, that i'll watch whatever sequels that come out, no matter how bad. This was definately better than the second, but not the fantastic film that the first was.
 
Gonna have to rent this bad boy. Might head to a Red Box tonight. :up:
 
they didn't have the budget to make it as good as the first one (and no Jake Busey, there's no reason they couldn't afford Jake Busey. He works for thirty bucks and two meals for godsakes! :cmad:).

.



I know . Wtf? They could of at least contacted Clancy Brown and Jake Busey. It might also of been a good idea to get some of those "d list celebs" on vhi and have them get killed or something .
 
I actually think these movies were pretty good.
 
Also, one more critique on my part...Casper Van Dien deserved a bigger role. He felt like little more than a glorified cameo with Jolene Balock's character being the real focus. I would've preferred more of a focus on Rico.
 
Watched the second one for the first time last night and........it wasnt as bad as I though it would be, it wasnt good, but it wasnt bad, and Kelly Carlson nude is always value for money in my book. BUT, why the hell didnt they use the score from the first movie?

Is the 3rd movie better?

Also, why the first one never got a big budget sequel is beyond me.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"