Sci-Fi Starship Troopers Remake Is in the Works

Man there really is no need to re-make this, unless it is going to be totally different. Watched the first one for the first time in a while tonight and it still hols up brilliantly.

If Neill Blomkamp was set as director though, it would get my attention.
 
Man I remember loving the original film.

I'm getting used to them remaking all manner of classic films now so this is just another one that I guess was always going to happen as well.
 
The only reason to remake this is if it's gonna be faithful to Heinlen's book.
 
The only reason to remake this is if it's gonna be faithful to Heinlen's book.

Well yeah but they said that about the TR remake and then paid lots if homage to the original anyway. I have never read the book but I imagine it is quite a bit different. It sounds like something Blomkamp or Liman would make something really different out of.
 
Not an update, but I thought this was cool...

http://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comments/2irdci/i_am_actor_michael_ironside_you_might_know_me/

shivan21 221 points 4 months ago

During the shooting of Starship Troopers, did you realize that it was in fact very clever parody?

MichaelIronside[S] 623 points 4 months ago

I don't think "parody" is an appropriate moniker to put on that film. I read STARSHIP TROOPERS when I was a teenager, which was a book, which was a very frightened, right wing, almost fascist view of our political world. And I was actually surprised that Paul Verhoeven was going to make a film about it. Or from it, I guess we should say, considering that Paul was a child of the second World War in Belgium and in Holland, he used to run around and plain the abandoned battlefields that the Germans and Allies had been in. So I didn't expect him to adapt a fascist, inflexible, very right wing, fear-based story. So I asked him, I said when I met him for the film, I said "Can I ask you one question?"

And Paul doesn't like questions. And he said "Okay, ONE question."

And I said "Why are you making a movie out of such a right wing manifesto?"

And he said "If I told a story that preached to everybody that war is bad," - in his own way of looking at the universe - if I made a film and preached to everybody that war is bad, and that violence based on politics and religion is bad, nobody would listen to me. So I'm going to create a perfect world where everyone is beautiful, and everyone has the right gun, but it's only good for killing bugs.

And that's what he said.
MichaelIronside[S] 430 points 4 months ago

Also, Heinlein wrote a book I think it's called THE CITIZEN's MANUAL right after, where he believed you shouldn't have the right to vote unless you've worn a uniform and fought for your country. He was very paranoid about the communist takeover of the world. I must paraphrase all of this.
 
After hearing that I have no real interest in ever reading the book lol I'll stick to the movie.
 
A lot of the great writers usually are.
 
If more faithful to the book, with some of the leads being prominently named:

Juan (Johnny) Rico

Dizzy Flores

Carmen Ibanez

I hope this time they at least cast some Latinos and especially Filipinos as leads.
 
Last edited:
Bad idea. The original film was a cult hit at best. Making a more faithful adaptation of the book isn't going to please mainstream audiences either.
 
Depending on how close they hew to the source material he might be right or they might change the tone and he will be completely wrong. Way too early to start judging a movie that hasn't even begun filming yet.
 
Last edited:
A light reading about Robert Heinlein's descent into Libertarian madness:

https://newrepublic.com/article/118048/william-pattersons-robert-heinlein-biography-hagiography

Heinlein went from being a left-wing New Dealer in the 1930s and 1940s to flirting with the John Birch Society in the late 1950s and supporting Barry Goldwater in the 1960s—and yet, he insisted that his politics were unwaveringly consistent. “From my point of view what has happed is not that I have moved to the right; it seems to me that both parties have moved steadily to the left,” Heinlein wrote his brother in 1964. Patterson, as was his wont on all major issues, sides with his subject and maintains that Heinlein’s politics remained fundamentally unchanged through his life. Heinlein was no “rightist,” Patterson assures us, but a lifelong “radical liberal” with a “democratic soul.” Patterson never explains how that “democratic soul” came to believe that the right to vote should be severely restricted, a position Heinlein advocated not just in Starship Troopers but also in nonfiction works.
 
One thing that the movie also did better than the book was to develop the supporting cast. As I recall, no one besides Rico really gets much development in the book because, well they're not in it enough.
 
I liked the first one. Not sure what they are going to change up this time around but will probably be watching it anyway.
 
I want this version to be loyal to the book mostly to see which one of the movies the average person prefers and why.
 
I can see a film in the same spirit of the book being made with US military support as a recruitment and propaganda tool along the lines of Battleship, Battle Los Angeles, GI Joe and Transformers. Ironically, the Verhoeven film basically predicted movies like these would exist eventually.
 
As long as we get another shower scene it's all good.
 
Man, I saw the original in the cinema back in 1997 - I was 11/12 at the time. It's legendary in my book. I'm not sure I want a remake of it - movie or tv. And a someone already mentioned it, it still holds up pretty well today.

But yeah, if it happened, it needs to be R with lots of gratuitous nudity.
 
Either way, it's gonna bomb anyway. Just like that Robin Hood re-re-remake.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"