What'd he say?Judging by this thread I'd guess ang_hulk.
Hey, lil' bro. This is a very odd threadWhat'd he say?![]()
What'd he say?![]()
him not marking the disc was his downfall,he coulda marked it "young bloods issues 7-14" or atleast put it somwhere better hidden then with the rest of his discs.
Him knowing how old they were will be his downfall,now he cant have his lawyer demanding proof of the 14 year looking ages and he may be involved in a ring.
O well,Im sure the professor put it to good use before turning it over.
Please keep in mind I started dating my girl friend when she was 16,just the right age and YES ida dated her if she was 15,mabey even 14.Its all about context when kids are nakie.
I also wanna point out that any time child porn comes up they dont list the context (<*(They said the children, the 7 year old children, were in "explicitly sexual situations")*>). Yet on abc we can see kids bathing togeather and people win money for it.....which is why i also think,in a certain respect in this counrty child porns a joke.
It is, and most of these people are mean about it.Hey, lil' bro. This is a very odd thread
o....
COMICBOY said:o....
I bet someone on this website looks at child porn.
Even though the original article stated that the images were of the children performing sexual acts or in sexually explicit situations? These weren't just naked kids. These were kids being raped.
you just refering to my grammer? or are you nit picking?
lol, dude, you may be a very cool, transgressive guy with an awesome sense of humor...but...lol, in real life?.....14 years old?......SEVEN years old?you just refering to my grammer? or are you nit picking?
lol, dude, you may be a very cool, transgressive guy with an awesome sense of humor...but...lol, in real life?.....14 years old?......SEVEN years old?
Seriously, I'd swear you're just an artless undercover "Cyber-Cop" who's trying to flush out perps....if not a ****ing stupid, sociopathic dude who has already figured out ways to conceal his shameful predilection for the most hurtful, purely evil kind of exploitation there IS.
lol
Please,....defend on!...the guy who was anxious to have the disc returned.....the disc that contained images depicting
SEVEN
year olds in
SEXUALLY EXPLICIT SITUATIONS
![]()
Im just saying,theyd count a girl in the bath tub blowing suds sexual explicit,same with a 14-50 year old.Im just saying.He said rape,i didnt get that from the article.Another thing,yes ida been the same with my girl at 14 as i was when she was 16,for your info,she had ds at sixteen and got into over 21 clubs WHEN I WAS CARDED AND TOLD NO!!!!(thats not directed to anyone but the ten year old looking 20 year old i face in the mirror each day) and again i was 19 at the time,i dont see a huge deal withit,i love her and i dont think much about age when im deep sea motorboating her massive nipple cushions which ive had the pleasure of watching grow over the past year and a half.One more thing-We havent had sex yet,shes a virgin and im cool with her wanting to wait until were hitched,we do all the other fun stuff though.Im against kids being exploited and raped but im just saying,context and I dont like how if some guy looked at a shot of a naked 14 year old hes a monster when familys sit around watching bathing kids over fill the bath tub and there parents getting thousands of dollares for willingly turning it over to some guy in a room full of tvs so the rest of the country can see it.As far as im concerned thats worse then an upskirt shot of a 12 year old.
sexual explicit could by them in the tub with bubbles and them blowing them out of there hand(which would make it look like they were blowing a kiss) or just touching themselves or somthin.Why do you think they were being raped?.