ang_hulk
Sidekick
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2003
- Messages
- 3,069
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
That is not generally considered sexually explicit you little pervert. I think you need to take another look at your definitions of 'sexually explicit' and 'rape' before I get my ass over there and pound the ideas into your uneducated little skull. What, do you think raping children is funny?! Do you think it should be protected by law?! I'm betting your one of those self righteous asswipes who wants the age of consent low enough that you can get yourself off without getting busted.
the consent age in pa is 16(meanwhile thats also the age to do coke and get trained by 20 year olds apprently) and trust me shes consented(over and over again.........yes...
).Anyhow,its the truth,cartoons have been sited for things being sexual explicit,one being the shelved cells of harley quin in panties,that was deemed sexual explicit.A girl coverd in bubbles in play boy,side boob,under boob,shadowed nipple blwoing them towars the camera IS and HAS BEEN sexually explicit for some time.Im just saying,a few nights ago i was watching the new afhv show and it had two little kids in the bath,they were playing in bubbles with there asses hanging out,whys this cool and having a shot of it marked child porn not cool? whys paying those kids familys cool and not having it as a screen saver not cool?.Im just saying.do i tihnk raping kids is funny............NO....did i say that..........NO......should it be legal......NO.CONTEXTTTTT! And as far as your insults...perverts accurate(my gf says prevert) but uneducated is innaccurate.If i have ot ill dig up some funny cases of what and what wasnt considerd sexually explicit,for you info,the green m&m will be among the cases...........i think your to uptight.




