Superman Returns Superman Returns: Happy 2 Year Anniversary

boywonder13

Sidekick
Joined
Aug 11, 2005
Messages
2,567
Reaction score
0
Points
31
Yes, it has been 2 years since the movie was released (June 21,2006) in theaters, being the first Superman movie in almost 20 years. There was great hype that followed it, and the movie was under many peoples expectations, but it seems like the general opinion was that it was an OK movie.

Well i guess, here this thread is just to talk about, how you felt about the movie than, how you feel about it now, how hyped you were for the movie, how not hyped you were, how u waited hours outside the theatre, or any stories pertaining to the release of this movie. This is the thread to do it.
 
Oh, no.

Well, before this gets ugly, I'll say that I was incredibly hyped for a Superman film, buying a ticket for the midnight IMAX showing, weeks in advance. I can still vividly recall the feeling of goosebumps, indicative of a fascination of the character stemming from childhood, that I had after the plane rescue. Seeing Superman emphatically announcing his return by saving the day and being showered with thunderous applause from those in attendance at the stadium, patrons inside the tavern and passersby on the street watching the TV in department stores is one of the best moments I've ever experienced from a film in this genre. Superman was back!

Unfortunately, that was about the high point of the film for me. The balance of the piece involved far too much melodrama and the placement of Supes in situations and dynamics that I didn't think befit him very well. Though my overall impression of SR is undoubtedly positive, I hope the sequel (provided there is one) tackles the subject matter in a different manner, as there are a number of inclusions in SR that I could do without. Certainly an enjoyable film, but I'd like the next on-screen incarnation of Superman be a lighter, more coherent effort that better reflects what made most of us fans of the character in the first place. :super:

Some more eye candy wouldn't hurt either. :o
 
I remember my anticipation for greatness on that day 2 years ago. I also remember walking out in utter shock at how poor this movie was. The script was extremely shoddy, Routh was a boring Superman (but was a good Kent), Bosworth's Lois was poorly written and acted, Luthor was a poor amalgamation of two different versions of Lex Luthor (should have just picked one), Lex's scheme is one of the dumbest in comic movies ever, the public loves Superman again far too easily, the kryptonite inconsistancies are rather annoying, and I could go on. This movie could have been great, but instead falls flat on its face. It is a pretentious piece of crap.

I don't mean to offend any Superman fans (I am a huge fan of Supes myself), but 2 years later, I am still mad at how this movie failed to achieve its potential.
 
Superman hardly said a word, maybe the filmmakers realized Routh couldn't act! Superman is emotionally inept. Spacey played Luthor to campy. Who'd buy land that you can't live on! Perry is now just a media mogul, a bureaucrat!
 
loved it
love it still
all the haters can grow up
the end
 
^^LOL, awesome post there, Snickers!

I want to say that I love the movie a great deal, but I won't share my experience just yet; I want to watch the film one more time this weekend (haven't seen it in a long time), and then I'll come back to this thread.
 
do u need a kleenex mate ?

I think your the one who needs a kleenex, since my not nice comments on a movie (which I have every right to post, I think posters forget this) so obviously offended you. Again, you need to grow up.
 
Yes, it has been 2 years since the movie was released (June 21,2006) in theaters, being the first Superman movie in almost 20 years. There was great hype that followed it, and the movie was under many peoples expectations, but it seems like the general opinion was that it was an OK movie.

Well i guess, here this thread is just to talk about, how you felt about the movie than, how you feel about it now, how hyped you were for the movie, how not hyped you were, how u waited hours outside the theatre, or any stories pertaining to the release of this movie. This is the thread to do it.
I read up on the film and didn't like what I heard so I wasn't excited at all but the reviews gave me a little hope that it would be decent. The reviews were wrong. I hated it, partly because it was so freakin boring and long winded. The horrible unsympathetic characters didn't help matters. The last half hour of that movie featured some of the worse stuff that I've ever seen. Words can't discribe just how much I hated the end of SR.
 
I was totally excited about this movie and sat down to watch it with my 12yr old son, he got bored and left after 30mins and i ended up watching it in two parts. IMO my son's reaction was probably most kids reaction to the movie, Superman is not relevant in todays world. Totally outdated :wow:
 
No, Superman done well can entertain anyone. We have an animated series that shows this. The problem is that Singer didn't have a vision that everyone cared for.

Superman has not faded out. Singer just did a poor job bringing him back to the people.
 
lol....has it really been two years? Jeeze, time does fly.

Well, two years ago I was very excited about Superman Returns, and I was actually very excited about Bryan Singer directing. I heard all the naysayers, and they made valid points. Still, I thought Singer could do it. I thought he could pull this movie off and successfully reintroduce the character for a new generation.

I was wrong. I didn't like SR at all! I tried to like it, but steadily I realized I hated the movie. It was a boringly lame flick with a brooding Superman. That just wasn't my cup of tea, and I couldn't believe Singer would do that to the MOS.

Today...I want a reboot. That pretty much sums it up for me.
 
I was born in 1981, so I missed Superman and Superman II. When Superman III came out, I was 2. So I missed that too. When Superman IV: The Quest for Peace came out, I was 6, so I could have gone to see that, I suppose, but it just never happened. In retrospect, I'm glad I didn't. Can you even imagine how disappointing it would be to see Superman on the big screen for the first time and for the movie to be crap? Oh ... wait ... I can. Because I went to see Superman Returns.

When I first heard that Bryan Singer was directing, I was excited. I'd loved The Usual Suspects, X-Men, and X2. About a year before Brandon Routh was officially announced as Superman, I entered "Clark Kent" into Google image search, saw the picture of him dressed up as Clark/Supes at that Halloween party, and said to myself, "There's the Man of Steel." Unfortunately, there was no one around at the time to hear my amazing prediction.

A year later, Routh is announced, and I'm kicking myself thinking, "Why in the HELL could I not have said that in public? S***!" Anyway, I wasn't quite sure what to expect. Was it gonna be a reboot? A sequel? A sequel set in some alternate timeline without any introduction to these new versions of the characters? Then, I got my answer. Superman III and Superman IV: The Quest for Peace were being erased. This new movie would be a new Superman III. I thought, "Great, I hated those anyway." Then ... the bad vibes started.

"Vague history" ... oh boy, this doesn't sound good. Either it is or it isn't a sequel, it can't be both. What the hell does "vague history" mean? Then, that first shot of Routh as Superman showed up. In case any of you have been to see Dr. Mierzwiak since then, here's a reminder,

routh_superman_gal.jpg


*Shudders*.

But, I tried my best to just brush my worries aside, go to the cinema, and enjoy the movie. Try as I might, I failed, miserably.

I don't think I have ever been more insulted in a cinema than I was by this particular shot right here,

SUPERMAN_RETURNS-3.jpg


*Shudders*.

If I'd had any popcorn, I'd have thrown up in it. Having said that, the CG Superman, IMO, put in a better performance than Brandon Routh. Maybe I'm being unfair. Maybe it was just his lack of experience. Or maybe it was that godawful script that gave him hardly any lines to speak. But either way, if he wanted to blow me away with his performance, he should have brought a giant electric fan ... from Krypton ... get it? ... Superfan? ... Ah, never mind. And Superman's character. Christ, give me a Bible to fill on Superman's character. Abandons his elderly mother to the lecherous advances of Ben Hubbard for five years, all of whose scenes, BTW, were cut out. Now there's a well-earned paycheck. Abandons Lois for five years after having slept with her. Slept with her when, BTW? Don't even get me started on all the headache-inducing timeline inconsistencies. Abandons the entire PLANET for five years. And then, when he pops up again, he's welcomed by a thunderous round of applause. I'd have thrown Kryptonite eggs at him. Oh, and lest we forget, the psycho stalking and eavesdropping. Yeah, real super.

Kate Bosworth was 23 when Superman Returns came out. 23. 23. ... 23. Whose bright idea was it to cast a 23 year old as a seasoned investigative reporter for the greatest newspaper on Earth? Noel Neill, 27. Phyllis Coates, ... OK, she was 24 ... but she looked older. Margot Kidder, 30. Teri Hatcher, 28. Even Erica Durance was 26 by the time she first appeared in Smallville. And I'm supposed to buy a 23 year old who, IMO, looks 18, and who's being forced to wear a wig that makes her look like a femme fatale from a Humphrey Bogart movie, and that makes her hairline look as if it's receding faster than Patrick Stewart's. Oh, and what's with treating Clark like crap she's just stepped in? And what's with treating her boyfriend of the last five years like crap she's just stepped in? And what's with bringing her 5 year old son into a potentially fatal situation? So she believes the 80 year old woman who owns the boat brought about that disastrous earthquake all on her own? And even if she did, for all Lois actually KNOWS, there could be ANYone on that boat! :whatever:.

Kevin Spacey as Lex Luthor. Fine. I didn't think his performance was bad. Although he may have looked a little bored on occasion. But the character was scripted horribly, IMO. Superman was rebooted in the comics in 1986, and 20 years later what do we get? A Luthor based on a film version from 1978, only not as much fun. Oh, and Lex, that land you just took out of the oven? Ya might wanna try actually building something on it. I think you'll find out the hard way that it's not exactly what anyone sober would call prime real estate.

Frank Langella as Perry White ...














... oh, I'm sorry, I nodded off there for a moment.

Finally, that was a fabulously epic battle with the supervillain at the end, wasn't it?

Oops, sorry, wrong movie.

Well, I think I'll let a very good friend of ours here at the Hype sum up my opinion of Superman Returns in three very aptly chosen words,

bill-2.gif
 
If I'd had any popcorn, I'd have thrown up in it. Having said that, the CG Superman, IMO, put in a better performance than Brandon Routh.

Classic. To express hatred against one thing and then use that thing to express hatred against the opposite.
 
If I'm not wrong, you hate CGI Superman but you love it if it allows you to hate no CGI Superman.
 
If I'm not wrong, you hate CGI Superman but you love it if it allows you to hate no CGI Superman.

What? For Christ's sake, I'm not even arguing this with you. I can't believe the way you're interpreting that. Bye.
 
I was pretty hyped about seeing Superman in the theaters for the first time and in Imax 3-D. I had bought action figures, posters, shirts, and etc. I enjoyed most of the trailers and tv spots and read some nice reviews. I still remember sitting in the theater when the WB logo hit, I was like "yeah this is it". When the Superman logo came duing the credits sequence coupled with the March of Superman theme, I felt like little kid.

The rest of the movie was okay...I mean there was some amazing sequences and moments I thought were done really well, but overall I kinda "meh" about he film. The action wasn't my problem (though could have used some more), it was the characterization and story. I didn't really care for Singer's approach to most of the characters and my fears were realized, Lex was goofy and that kid ended up being Superman's (I didn't like it when first announced that Lois had a kid).

I wished that Bryan had stayed with X-men as I flat out didn't enjoy number three.
 
Last edited:
well, where was SUPERMAN in this movie? Is he still going to return?!
 
I was so incredibly hyped for a new Superman movie only to be so incredibly disappointed after watching it. At first, I was in denial after watching it, almost forcing myself to like it. I saw it a few more times and after some time passed, it finally sunk in for me. This was an awful superhero movie. I cared for none of the characters, with the small exception of Richard, he was at least likeable. There was only one good action sequence. Everything else was completely forgettable. There was no sense of fun, adventure and awe which I would have expected from a Superman film. Throw in the Maury Povich who's your daddy storyline, and this movie was a total misfire. This movie offered almost nothing to me for why I watch a superhero movie.

Singer should have just stayed with X-Men.
 
To be honest, I feel the X-Men movies are overrated. Magneto's master plan in X1 was lame, X1 and X2 basically strip Cyclops of all good personality aspects and give them to Wolverine (in X1, HE COMES UP WITH THE PLAN TO BEAT MAGNETO!!! WHAT!!!), and in X2 we see that no one wanted to bother with Cyclops any more by writing him out of 3/4's of the movie. Him dying in X3 was an extension of this precedent in X2. Not to mention Bobby was a lame character in X2 (why did they give him a suit? Oh yeah, he built an ice wall :whatever:), Sabertooth was done really poorly (and his money fight with Wolvie sucked).

Don't get me wrong, I like many things about X1 and X2, but I feel them to be good movies, not great ones (though X2 is clearly better). They at least got some characters right (Ian was amazing as Magneto, Nightcrawler, and Charles in particular). I think X3 succeeded where X1 failed in action, but it was definately very low on character.

While Singer was a much better X-Men man, he still didn't wow me with his X-Men movies. And to those saying I am just a Singer hater, I was criticizing X1 and X2 for the same reasons I do now WAY before Singer even thought of a SR.
 
^ I agree with your problems of the X-films, I could even add some. I just enjoyed X1 and X2 better as X-films than I did SR as a Superman film.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"