He doesn't.
Thank you for stating the obvious. Again, one of the many aspects of adaptations is taking creative liberties. Seeing as how I think that both Brainiac and the Eradicator should be in a movie, I thought of a way to mix both together.
Nope. It really isn't that Convoluded. Detailed? Sure! The problem is that you assume that for some reason that all of that backstory is going to be jammed into one movie along with a billion other plot points. The First Rule of having detailed plotlines and backstories is to have the Characters explain them at approapriate Times. It's that simple. You are just making things sound more complicated than they really are.
Who hasn't. However, it works in varying degrees. In Action Movies and Comedies, it works to a small degree if you want cheap thrills, lots of action and laughs. Sci-Fi, Fantasy (esp Superhero movies) need more.
Says you?? What the hell do you know about what an audience wants. For starters, you are definately not giving the General Audience much credit at all with you incorrect, uneducated assumption. Second, Predicting the GA tastes as far as I know is an inexact science to begin with. The GA is very unpredictable on many occasions.
The last point: Again, you go with your foolish assumptions.
What sane person would literally throw in a huge backstory and actually showcase on screen?? Are you really that dense?? The whole notion of that backstory is to show some depth for the Villain. The back story would be explained (in part) by him selectively. The rest would be reveal in approapriate times as things progress. That's how you handle detail.
Really?? Care to explain. All of your points are based on really bad assumptions, so I'd like to see a list.
Again that angle is in the works. The fact that you seem to site it as a "Hole" is ludicrous. Your looking at an incomplete work (I haven't even written anything down) as a script draft. I find your logic quite juvenile.
Really?? Personally, I could care less whether you like my concept or not, if that's what you are getting at. That's how the world works. If anything I'm just baffled by how you debate. For someone who is so passionately against my Idea, I would have expected more detail in why you dislike my idea. Then you judge an incomplete concept like a complete one. You recycle point after point again and again. It get's annoying. That combined with your ignorant assumptions gets old. Again, I have no problem with you disagreeing with me, but be on topic when you do.
However, I will say one thing. My Brainiac concept is a bit Much. I know that.
I think that with Movies, risks should be taken. Sticking to a certain status quo makes things get stale. I think that with some refinement that My concept, albeit risky, is a good calculated risk. It's a good mixing of Pre and Post Crisis w/o just cutting and pasting the stories from the comics on film.
Now for STAS, I just didn't like any of it at all for so many reasons. I've posted on it here many a time. It's juvenile writing, full of plot holes, Plot inconsistencies, lousy Villain Portrayals. (Save Luthor and Darkseid) and many other problems I can list on another thread. To me this is the last resource that we should be looking for inspiration for Superman movie storylines. (There is 60 years worth of comics for that)