Junfan said:That was the first OMG feat of clarks speed on SV.
But I think biggest feat yet has been in the recent EP where he went from SV to Honduras in a few seconds, which has to be roughly 2500 miles (if you straight line it).
So he should be less pissed because Luthor was going to kill millions?Spare-Flair said:But Luthor didn't kill those millions. Luthor's actions however, did result in Lois' death. Superman didn't lose it until he lost Lois.
VGPOP said:Yahoo Summer Reviews.
[SIZE=-1]The filmmakers claim that the action and f/x sequences will be so groundbreaking, you will believe a man can fly.[/SIZE]
http://movies.yahoo.com/movie/1807839024/smg
I actually believe it already. In the last trailer, his speed is so strong, you see the force lifting papers off the street.
bsquad said:So he should be less pissed because Luthor was going to kill millions?
Spare-Flair said:Think about it this way. Would you be more pissed off at someone who starts a war that could potentially kill millions of people around the country...or would you be more pissed off at needless death of your wife of girlfriend just right this instant? Superman managed to save those other people...but he couldn't save Lois.
Lois' death is immediate, has happened, is intimate, and personal for Superman.
bsquad said:considering my girlfriend would most likely be killed during his strike I would be just as pissed
and you keep talking about how its ok for the the 1 to out weigh the many. Lois was in that area to. He was told that before he left the Daily Planet. She was already in danger. Why didn't he go faster then?Spare-Flair said:you keep talking "potential" deaths, "most likely" or would die anyway. I don't know about you but indirect violence is much less personal than direct violence that has already happened. Lois died. Superman screamed so loud it was heard in space. Superman never screamed when other people were hurt or died.
bsquad said:would'nt both be needless? plus considering my girlfriend would most likely be killed during his strike (he was told she was in the area before he left) not to mention that as Superman I would try not to be that selfish as to care about just the 1 when everyone else is in trouble as well I can honestly say I would be just as pissed.
And like I said before, it's fun to watch but still did not make much sense.
so because she may not die its ok for him not to go faster? how is it blind rage to push your self to go faster? if someone did that I would try to stop it right then and there. what would waiting achieve when I know I can stop it nowSpare-Flair said:If somebody says he is going to unleash a virus that will eventually kill your girlfriend someday, do you at that instant look to the sky and scream in agony? Then ru off in a blind rage trying to do something drastic to fix it? Did Captain Kirk scream "KHAAAAAAAAAAAAAANNNNN" because Khan could have potentially killed people, or was it because Khan actually killed his son?
bsquad said:so because she may not die its ok for him not to go faster? how is it blind rage to push your self to go faster? if someone did that I would try to stop it right then and there. what would waiting achieve when I know I can stop it now
Spare-Flair said:Because Superman isn't perfect. He's very much human. He still lets his emotions get in the way. I'm sorry, Superman does care for Lois more than all those other people he doesn't know. She is the love of his life.
Human beings are said to be able to achieve things they normally cannot when under significant emotional pain or duress. Animals can achieve amazing physical feats as well. It's usually attributed to adrenaline but people can do things they normally cannot do when really pushed to the edge. This is a common theme in literature, mythology, comics, philosophy, etc. It can be compared with the "berserker rage", or simply anguished determination and impossible acts of passion.
Superman is not some omnipotent god will full control over his emotions and will or even his own physical abilities. He is a mortal burdened with the responsibility of an entire planet and the feelings of a single man.
Superman isn't a robot who can go: "I calculate the probability of saving everyone is 100% if I do this and this in proper order and at the proper speed"...
He has his limits, he doesn't know everything, he isn't confident of all he's doing. He's just doing his best but he makes mistakes. Not being fast enough resulting in Lois' death was a mistake. That's what makes him sympathetic, that's what makes the character "human".
bsquad said:like I said before awesome to watch but does not make since. because now if you really think about it it makes him look like a skirt chasing jerk
Superman-"Gee Lois I really like you"
(elsewhere)
Son-"Dad that earthquake is coming right for us"
Dad-"Don't worry son, Superman will save us"
Superman-"So Lois, what are you doing tonight..."
Spare-Flair said:Nobody died in Superman the Movie. Superman saved them all. Remember, he's not rotating the earth, he himself is going back in time. Therefore, when Superman was going back in time, his previous self was still in other places saving those people and doing what he did in the first place. That was just so that he could be in two places at the same time since he couldn't before to save Lois. Yes this is temporal paradox because if Lois dies, then Superman won't go back in time to save her therefore she would have died and Superman would have gone back, etc. ad infinitum. But there are no time travel movie or comic books that exist without temporal paradoxes...if you go via the latest theories of Stephen Hawking, temporal paradoxes can happen because you are simply creating new quantum realities (based on Quantum physics since any atom has the random possibility of any random state and all possibilities are actually accounted for in their own universe).
And it's "doesn't make sense", you've been writing since for awhile
bsquad said:what does my spelling have to do with anything? If you can read what I wrote and understand it then you get the point I hate when people try to attack spelling like this is a damn english class and a valid argument.
and if he goes back into time than doesn't that mean there would be 2 Supermen flying around-1 with Lois the other saving people still. it still does not make since and your theory just opens up more issues the film did not deal with-thus making more plot holes
I'm sorry but that makes Superman look like an *******. Like I said it was fun to watch-but does not make sinceEros said:Superman reversed time on Earth alone, and went back to save Lois first. He may have killed a few people, but he doesn't know them like he did Lois. Superman may be a super-genuis, but he listened to his heart instead of his head.
bsquad said:Plus the fact remains that Superman knew not only Lois but the world was in danger (your ignoring the fact that he was told where she was and where the missles impact would affect, which was right where she was) yet he struggled to catch the missle but was able to go fast enough to travel through time.
Spare-Flair said:Again, he didn't feel the impact of her death until afterward. He didn't have the emotional and physical strength to go beyond his natural abilties and limitations until he felt that pain. You know how things don't hit you until they have actually happened? You don't realize what a big mistake something was after it happened and you wonder why you didn't have the will or strength or intelligence to do it right the first time?
That's what makes him human, he makes mistakes. Superman went back in time alone, but the other Superman from before he went back in time was still saving people.