• Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version.

Terrible T. Rex Was a Slowpoke

Galactus

Devourer of Worlds
Joined
Sep 1, 2000
Messages
16,277
Reaction score
1
Points
31
By LiveScience Staff

posted: 06 June 2007 09:17 am ET

T. rex was no slacker. But the popular image of a nimble predator turning on a dime and chasing down prey with lightning speed is fiction, new computer models show. The terrifying tyrannosaur was actually a slowpoke.
Previous studies have looked at the movements of birds, the direct descendents of dinosaurs, and fossilized footprints to judge how Tyrannosaurus rex would have moved.
To get a better estimate of the giant’s movement, the new study modeled a typical complete T. rex skeleton, which probably weighed between about 13,000 and 17,000 pounds, and estimated its center of mass and the inertia, or resistance to movement, that it would have had when the animal turned or pivoted.
The center of mass is important to consider because two animals with similar weights may move in different ways depending on how their mass is distributed. For example, an elephant’s four tree trunk-like legs keep its center of mass over its feet, while T. rex would have had to balance its mass differently over its two small legs, bending them to keep from toppling over.
The model results, detailed in the June 21 issue of the Journal of Theoretical Biology, also showed that T. rex would have had considerable inertia preventing it from turning quickly; a 45-degree turn would have taken one or two seconds—far longer than for a human.
These calculations lend further support to previous research indicating that the large tyrannosaurs could run no faster than 25 mph (and certainly not the 45 mph seen in some movies), because its leg muscles weren’t big enough for fast running.
“We now know that a T. rex would have been front heavy, turned slowly and could manage no more than a leisurely jog,” said team leader John Hutchinson of the Royal Veterinary College.
 
:eek:

I. Am. Shocked.
 
Hold on. You're telling me Jurassic Park WASN'T scientifically accurate?

Blasphemy!

Seriously though, good article.
 
I'm not surprised by this....the t-rex was big as hell
 
Heard aboout this a while back. Goes along with the theory of T-Rex being a scavenger and not a hunter I guess.
 
How fast did they clock the T. Rex in Jurassic Park? 35 mph? I can't remember.
 
I thought that was kinda inaccurate anyways. When you watch the movie, and it's at the part when the Rex is chasing Ellie, Muldoon and Ian in the Jeep, they must be going 45-50 MPH, maybe faster, but the T. Rex is right there with them! :huh:
 
Clearly, this is a politically biased article. We've known for over a decade now that Rexes can travel up to 45 mph.
 
By LiveScience Staff

posted: 06 June 2007 09:17 am ET

T. rex was no slacker. But the popular image of a nimble predator turning on a dime and chasing down prey with lightning speed is fiction, new computer models show. The terrifying tyrannosaur was actually a slowpoke.
Previous studies have looked at the movements of birds, the direct descendents of dinosaurs, and fossilized footprints to judge how Tyrannosaurus rex would have moved.
To get a better estimate of the giant’s movement, the new study modeled a typical complete T. rex skeleton, which probably weighed between about 13,000 and 17,000 pounds, and estimated its center of mass and the inertia, or resistance to movement, that it would have had when the animal turned or pivoted.
The center of mass is important to consider because two animals with similar weights may move in different ways depending on how their mass is distributed. For example, an elephant’s four tree trunk-like legs keep its center of mass over its feet, while T. rex would have had to balance its mass differently over its two small legs, bending them to keep from toppling over.
The model results, detailed in the June 21 issue of the Journal of Theoretical Biology, also showed that T. rex would have had considerable inertia preventing it from turning quickly; a 45-degree turn would have taken one or two seconds—far longer than for a human.
These calculations lend further support to previous research indicating that the large tyrannosaurs could run no faster than 25 mph (and certainly not the 45 mph seen in some movies), because its leg muscles weren’t big enough for fast running.
“We now know that a T. rex would have been front heavy, turned slowly and could manage no more than a leisurely jog,” said team leader John Hutchinson of the Royal Veterinary College.

Actually, many scientists have believed this for a while now that T-Rex was more of a scavenger due to his size, and lack o' arms, and olafactory senses.

And your name totally f'ing rocks.
 
That's common knowledge. You'd be more scared of the raptors than the T-Rex, unless that mofo just had you cornered. You can't outrun a cheetah or a raptor more than likely.
 
Of course it couldn't "turn on a dime". I don't think it did that in Jurassic Park.
And It could go fast, much faster than a human at least, but it's endurance was very low, as we saw in Jurassic Park when it chased the jeep. The chase only lasted maybe a minute or so before it gave up.
 
Of course it couldn't "turn on a dime". I don't think it did that in Jurassic Park.
And It could go fast, much faster than a human at least, but it's endurance was very low, as we saw in Jurassic Park when it chased the jeep. The chase only lasted maybe a minute or so before it gave up.
How many T. Rexs have you seen running? :huh:
 
Clearly, this is a politically biased article. We've known for over a decade now that Rexes can travel up to 45 mph.

This is indeed just the latest item in an ongoing historical revisionist smear campaign against the tyrannosaurus rex. First that whole "he was a scavenger" argument, then the insulting suggestion that T-rex might have had feathers, now the claim that he couldn't even run down a human being.

I tell you, there are anti-T-rex forces at work here that are trying to erode the traditional image of T-rex as the coolest dinosaur ever and I for one am not buying into this poisonous propaganda! :cmad:
 
are you guys foreal in thinking that this is politically driven? sometimes it's hard to tell if people are joking on the net...

...if so, why would scientists be trying to slander a creature that's extinct? it's not as if any of them were around to eat these scientists' families or anything. they've already found evidence that the T-Rex was a scavenger instead of a hunter, why is it hard to believe that it would also be slow?
 
didnt evry one know t-rex was slow?

its large legs and body praportion would have thrown the dino off balance if it hit speeds more than 20 to 25 causing it to fall over giving smaller carnivorus dinos an advantage at eating it.

i watch too much science channel.
 
I tell you, there are anti-T-rex forces at work here that are trying to erode the traditional image of T-rex as the coolest dinosaur ever and I for one am not buying into this poisonous propaganda! :cmad:

I say "Screw the T-Rex!!!" :cmad: :cmad: :cmad:

Long live the Triceratops!!! :word: :word:

:yay:
 
triceratops.jpg
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"