The Lizard
Didn't eat Billy
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2000
- Messages
- 15,632
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
Yeah, I was just kidding about this being a conspiracy.
But still, T-Rex > Triceratops, suckas.
But still, T-Rex > Triceratops, suckas.

Yeah, I was just kidding about this being a conspiracy.
But still, T-Rex > Triceratops, suckas.![]()
Velociraptor ftw.
![]()
t:
I felt bad when Spinosaurus killed him in JPIII![]()
well that's was discovered to be bout the size of a chicken
I could still believe that the Rex could run,that bulk could be muscle also.
By LiveScience Staff
posted: 06 June 2007 09:17 am ET
T. rex was no slacker. But the popular image of a nimble predator turning on a dime and chasing down prey with lightning speed is fiction, new computer models show. The terrifying tyrannosaur was actually a slowpoke.
There is a variety of raptor known as the Utah Raptor that was 8' tall.well that's was discovered to be bout the size of a chicken
that was such B.S. anybody that studies dinosaurs knows that a Spino would never stand a chance against a Rex
I felt bad when Spinosaurus killed him in JPIII![]()
Velociraptors were about 3 feet tall in real life, so i dont know what chickens you've got but i want onewell that's was discovered to be bout the size of a chicken
Also Dilophosaurus is approximately 10-14 ft. tall, but the characteristics of the dilo and the raptor were switched for Jurassic Park to make the raptors more fearsome.well that's was discovered to be bout the size of a chicken
Make it Giant Raptors, and there ya go.Damn it! Just when I was about to make a SM3 fan-script wherein Dr. Connors experiments with reptiles and unknowingly or accidentally creates a T-Rex which obliterates his lab and wreaks havok on NY city, then Spiderman tries to catch up with the T-Rex but Spidey struggles because the T-Rex is fast! Now, this article comes up?! Damn it!Now, I'm changing the T-Rex to Raptors with the side-plot of them eating the scientists!
![]()
.....t:
t:
t:
Also Dilophosaurus is approximately 10-14 ft. tall, but the characteristics of the dilo and the raptor were switched for Jurassic Park to make the raptors more fearsome.
T-rex versus Beckham? Sorry, David, you're lunch
By Michael Kahn Tue Aug 21, 8:20 PM ET
LONDON (Reuters) - The smallest dinosaur could reach speeds of nearly 40 mph (64 kph) and even the lumbering Tyrannosaurus rex would have been able to outrun most modern-day sportsmen, according to research published on Wednesday.
Scientists using computer models calculated the top speeds for five meat-eating dinosaurs in a study they say can also illustrate how animals cope with climate change and extinction.
The velociraptor, whose speed and ferocity was highlighted in the film "Jurassic Park," reached 24 mph while the T-rex could muster speeds of up to 18 mph, the study published in the Royal Society's Biological Sciences showed.
"Our research, which used the minimum leg-muscle mass T-rex required for movement, suggests that while not incredibly fast, this carnivore was certainly capable of running and would have little difficulty in chasing down footballer David Beckham, for instance," said Phil Manning, a paleontologist at the University of Manchester, who worked on the study.
It is a slowpoke, relative to other dinosaurs, and to prior thought.Wait a minute! Complete scientific 180 degree turn!
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070822/ts_nm/dinosaur_speed_dc
So the T-rex goes from being a "slowpoke" a couple months ago to being "faster than David Beckham" now?
Make up your minds, paleontologists! Which is it?
Of course you realize that this scientific flip-flopping means that the Bible is true and evolution is officially debunked.![]()
Wait a minute! Complete scientific 180 degree turn!
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070822/ts_nm/dinosaur_speed_dc
So the T-rex goes from being a "slowpoke" a couple months ago to being "faster than David Beckham" now?
Make up your minds, paleontologists! Which is it?
Of course you realize that this scientific flip-flopping means that the Bible is true and evolution is officially debunked.![]()
Where the hell did you hear this? There have been documented cases of sharks killing people long before that time.(About 100 years ago, scientists didn't think sharks were capable of killing people. Good call on that one, guys.)