SikeMullivan
Civilian
- Joined
- Mar 13, 2014
- Messages
- 388
- Reaction score
- 1
- Points
- 11
Looks exactly like the first game with more annoying enemies and slightly improved graphics. I think I'll pass.
Graphics don't look improved to me, and it is a good attitude to not get excited about itLooks exactly like the first game with more annoying enemies and slightly improved graphics. I think I'll pass.
To be all over the place Spider-Man needs faster animation for him alone, some seem to dislike it cause it gives them a headache, but the web rush mechanic kinda make up for thatThe only thing that stuck out to me is the slingshot I don't see much that's changed
and Spider-Man is not Batman he should be all over the place
Yeah, just ignore at what appears to be poor texture work on the buildings, likely bad AA and possibly unstable framerate. The lighting looks decent, but this doesn't really look like a "next-gen" game. The draw distance looks nice, but those buildings just look copy and pasted. People's standards in terms of open world graphics (post GTA V and InFamous) aren't going to be doing this game any favors that's for sure lol
There are HUNDREDS of PS3 titles that put this game to shame graphically. Don't even start.
-insert schooling from someone who actually understands this medium-
I wanst to fond of the web rush because I felt there wasnt enough animations and I want to do it manually spider-man 2 & 3 gave me that great feeling of being a human pinball TASM2 has spidey moving fast but the games doesn't its just the way I view Spidey should be and this game so far doesn;t meet all of my expectationsTo be all over the place Spider-Man needs faster animation for him alone, some seem to dislike it cause it gives them a headache, but the web rush mechanic kinda make up for that
Beenox think they owe the fans, and I applaud to them for that
I've been a paid game critic since shortly before the release of Ultimate Spider-man.

Do you even know the meaning of the terms you just used? Not only is Spidey under a light shaft, but it causes him to cast self-shadows in a rather realistic way. Most self-shadowing in games leads to one type of casting on the surface of the subject's body, but we can see the shadows bending appropriately under the light in the screen shot of Spidey.
Next, I see no aliasing what so ever, and my computer monitor resolution is set to 1440x900 (16:10 widescreen). You have ZERO way of determining the framerate based on a PHOTO STILL. What makes something appear animated is the speed at which individual images are shown in rapid succession. So the only way to tell what the frame rate is, is by observing the game in motion.
As for the buildings, those are all rather diverse in height and architectural style. A developer from Beenox even gave an interview in which he notes that special attention was given to creating a more believable city, which included attention to building variation in height and aesthetic.
And just by listing iNfamous, I can tell you are a console gamer. You should be among the least judgmental about anything related to graphics, because from my perspective (PC gamer), it would be quite easy to say that Grand Theft Auto V and iNfamous look like garbage on consoles. Grand Theft Auto V doesn't even look as good as the PC edition of GTA IV with the ICE mod.
I don't know who you are trying to impress with your poorly phrased rhetoric. This isn't some pissing contest. If you enjoy this game, great, if not, then keep complaints objective. And no, you aren't being objective when you use art terms incorrectly. That just makes you inconsiderate of those whom wish to have a genuine discussion about this game.
And before any one wonders about the GTA comparison
![]()
That is GTA IV with the ICEnhancer mod. ^
![]()
That is Grand Theft Auto V. ^ So we can return to our lovely conversation about Amazing Spider-Man 2 and stop worrying about "expectations" from newer open world games. Especially when those expectations are rather abysmal when put in a more grand perspective.
Excited about this! I thought that trailer looked awesome, and love the look of the web swinging. I thought the first one was great, and didn't mind the web swinging too much, the only thing I hated about it was finite crimes...but now that that's taken care of, I am pre-ordering this xD.
Also really happy they've added a few elements that a lot of RPGs have. Such as dialogue choices, several outfits with different stats (not really stats in this case, but perks) that are upgradable, different web types, and the morality system. I'm not expecting any of these things to be incredible, but I'm happy they've added them. i know the game isn't going to be the best thing ever made by any means, but I think it looks like it could be one of the best movie based games / spider-man games
I like you.
I don't recall anyone asking about that.
You know who else is a paid game critic? Greg Miller at IGN.

On that note, I do not mean for my aforementioned post to suggest that I am one of those "PC gaming master race" clowns. I also play video games on the Wii, and that is certainly not a graphics power house. But it is always problematic to me when people get so hung up on graphics and elitist mentalities rather than addressing the rest of what makes a game enjoyable.
