Venom Spectre
Civilian
- Joined
- Jun 19, 2014
- Messages
- 67
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 1
These are my favorites. Real nice and simple concept.
No offense but what reason would they make Doc Ock female? again no offense.
Yeah, I'd stick with Otto..
I just hope Ock is a genuine villain with a solid backstory and motive. Hopefully they'll actually go back and understand everything that Molina did right with the character, and realize they can't half-ass the character the way they did with Rhino.
I know I'm going to be burned alive but..... Molina's Ock was overrated IMO..
We can burned alive together man because I feel the exact same way.
He was fine as Ock, nothing special, nothing scary or intimidating. I much preferred him before he turned into a villain; he was too cheesy when he was taken over by the arms (but obviously not cheesier than Max Dillon).
Doc Ock was only good in SM2 for the action scenes, the train scene in particular, and that was it.
I enjoyed Rhino with the minuscule amount of screen time he had. He served his purpose in the movie, which was to be a nut job who smashed things, and Giamatti clearly relished it. It wouldn't have made sense to add more to him as a character, because he didn't fit into the rest of the movie. Now, if he is indeed included in S6, then they can flesh him out more.
I just hope Ock is a genuine villain with a solid backstory and motive. Hopefully they'll actually go back and understand everything that Molina did right with the character, and realize they can't half-ass the character the way they did with Rhino.
I enjoyed Rhino with the minuscule amount of screen time he had. He served his purpose in the movie, which was to be a nut job who smashed things, and Giamatti clearly relished it. It wouldn't have made sense to add more to him as a character, because he didn't fit into the rest of the movie. Now, if he is indeed included in S6, then they can flesh him out more.
Out of all the villains from the S6, he's the one I'm hoping they nail and work on first which is why I think they should angle the film with Ock being the main character/protagonist.
Well said, man! I don't understand why people aren't grasping the concept that that was Rhino's purpose and they didn't need to do anything else with the character; he was a minor villain that didn't need a backstory or fleshing out, he just had to be crazy and for Spider-Man to make fun of him and have a quick brawl with. Also, welcome to the boards, I've only really started seeing you around here so I thought I'd say "hi".t:
Have to disagree with you there. He was warm and sympathetic as Octavius, and as Ock he was just the right amount of maniacal and understated, probably the least overacted of the Spidey villains with the exception of Sandman. As for Foxx, I was surprised that they decided to make Max unstable from the get-go, rather than a steady loss of sanity. Yeah, it was overacted, but I don't disdain it to the same extent that others do. Foxx has acted his way out of far inferior movies than this, and I enjoyed him as Electro.
Aw thanks man! Am I the only one who liked Foxx's Electro? Because I really feel that way. I don't think he was miscast at all, he's too skilled of an actor to be completely wrong for a role, and I thought he was damn menacing in certain scenes. The way he says "You better make DAMN sure you kill me this time!" to Dr. Kafka was great.
I agree with you regarding Octavius but Ock just wasn't menacing enough for me, especially after Dafoe's great performance and role in the first Raimi film. Molina was just the tiniest step down from Dafoe as the villain.
Foxx was great as Electro in the third act, and really badass too, but was just a little too much in parts of the film where didn't really have much to do and wasn't fleshed out. E.g., I liked how confused and scared he was in Times Square and I can understand him getting angry when Spider-Man suddenly stole his spotlight but when the cheesy one-liners rolled through, it was enough.
Max Dillon, pre-transformation, could have been dialed down a little, especially when they were trying to go for the sympathetic route which didn't come across well at all (mainly because I think they cut that out, especially with the absence of the scene with Max's mother). If they put more emphasis on Max being a little mentally unstable, maybe being seen taking medication at the start of the movie to show him trying to combat that and fit in to the world around him, then that could have worked. Maybe him obsessing over Spider-Man wasn't the best route to have taken either.
Out of all the villains from the S6, he's the one I'm hoping they nail and work on first which is why I think they should angle the film with Ock being the main character/protagonist.
Agreed.
In regards to all of the villains, though, what worries me most about this film is that if it isn't executed properly, it will ruin the image for a lot of villains at once.
It will kill a lot of birds with one stone, so to speak.
I actually assumed that Harry would be the protagonist for S6, simply based on how TASM2 ended, and I'm also assuming everything that happened in TASM2 will be connected to S6.
It's enough for them to have to cover the other four villains that haven't been introduced yet. Also, while there should be a power struggle within the group, I believe the eventual leader should be Doc Ock. I'm not all antsy about comic book accuracy for small details here and there, but they're going to be introducing the S6 for the first time onscreen. This is one of the prominent story-lines from Spidey's comics, and they need to do it the right way. Goblin wasn't even part of the original S6 in the first place. Furthermore, I just can't see Harry, at least this version of him, manning a group of badass villains. This could also provide a different arc where the group ousts him as well, and adds to the rage he felt after being cheated by Oscorp.
Here's a snippet of a post I made a couple days ago regarding that topic:
Good point. Ock will be leader of the group with Harry feeling cheated and resentful towards the rest of the group, who are presumably all older and more experienced. Also, what would be the motivation for the rest of the group, since they'll all be coming from Oscorp? Harry and Aleksei have already been introduced and have their vendettas against Spidey, but what about Otto, Adrian, Sergei and Quentin? What would fuel their hatred for Spidey, and how are they going to work that in even with his role being "immaterial" per Garfield?
That's what I think would work best. It was clear in TASM2 that Harry's character was making a rash decision in an attempt to get Spidey's blood. His impatience was a byproduct of his immaturity. He doesn't have a self-contained, mature personality that could take charge of a group, in my opinion.
The motivations for the rest of the villains boggle my mind. If they're already in Oscorp, why would they bother to help Harry? Instead, maybe their equipment ("Everything we need is already at Oscorp") is what's already at Oscorp, and the characters themselves will be given it in order to carry out their plans. But, again, that's a little weak in terms of thorough story building, and that makes me wonder how they'll carry out Doc Ock in particular.
(Also, sorry if this thread is going off topic. I just realized we're still in the "Fan Art" thread!)
Nice stuff in here.
This is what I'm working on right now.
![]()