The De2cent

I'm thinking that it could've been a combination of both plus being trapped in a cave and going crazy.
Maybe in De2cent we can have Tina running around playing Juno's vengeful ghost if Colson decides to go the route with Sarah living.:dry:
 
This was to good to have a sequel. And even more alarming, to not have Marshall at the helm.
 
Stormyprecious said:
Actually the UK version implies more heavily that they weren't real than the US version does.

Ultimately it can be taken either way.

As for the ridiculously stupid title, I doubt it'll stick anyway. Scream 3 was titles "Scr3am" for a while, but it didn't last. It's just a working title.
Click to expand...
Exactly. Marshall wanted it to be up for different interpretations. The UK version really throws you for a loop, because she is sitting down looking her daughter and birthday cake as it panned away with the creature noises going on around her. Great movie.
 
There's the exact same ending in the Uncut version as well. However, it still seems a bit unclear on whether Sarah escapes from the cave or not.

In the uncut version, we have the part where Sarah escapes from the cave and see's a ghost/vision/nightmare or Juno (did the UK version show this part in it at all?). Next, thing you know Sarah's back in the cave looking at her daughter and the birthday cake (the UK ending). So it seems she's either back in the cave and only dreamed/visualized her escape. However, a second explanation could be that she escaped the cave and passed out in her car dreaming she was back in the cave, which could show while she physically escaped, she didn't mentally, spiritually, or emotionally.
 
Mr. Sinister05 said:
There's the exact same ending in the Uncut version as well. However, it still seems a bit unclear on whether Sarah escapes from the cave or not.

In the uncut version, we have the part where Sarah escapes from the cave and see's a ghost/vision/nightmare or Juno (did the UK version show this part in it at all?). Next, thing you know Sarah's back in the cave looking at her daughter and the birthday cake (the UK ending). So it seems she's either back in the cave and only dreamed/visualized her escape. However, a second explanation could be that she escaped the cave and passed out in her car dreaming she was back in the cave, which could show while she physically escaped, she didn't mentally, spiritually, or emotionally.
Click to expand...

Interesting interpretation. :up:
 
How about this. None of it really happened. We see her daughter when she woke up in the hospital and at the end. Then when she goes into the hall we get the lights going out behind her sequence. What if she was in a coma and never really woke up, dreaming the whole thing. You can go on and on with theories. Just like the briefcase in Pulp Fiction. That's what makes the movie great. A sequel will ruin it.
 
Another thing about the UK ending, when she wakes up there are no bones anywhere around her, unlike before when the bones of all the Crawler fodder were scattered about; Sarah's body is also positioned like a Crawler when she wakes up; some of quite a few indications that Crawlers were a creation of her very warped mind.
 
I'm going to watch this movie again, after all this talk about it. I have the UK version dl'ed. I haven't seen the edited US version.
 
KALEL114 said:
I'm going to watch this movie again, after all this talk about it. I have the UK version dl'ed. I haven't seen the edited US version.
Click to expand...

Just stop the movie when Sarah's eyes pop open before the final scene inside the cave, and you've seen it.
 
KALEL114 said:
How about this. None of it really happened. We see her daughter when she woke up in the hospital and at the end. Then when she goes into the hall we get the lights going out behind her sequence. What if she was in a coma and never really woke up, dreaming the whole thing. You can go on and on with theories. Just like the briefcase in Pulp Fiction. That's what makes the movie great. A sequel will ruin it.
Click to expand...
this is actually what i thought happneed. the scene in the hospital has a deeper meaning.

such a great movie. i will ahve to ignore the sequel-
 
Juno ( Natalie Mendoza)
300natalie_mendoza.jpg


Tina from Mtv's The Real World:
281x211tina.jpg


..uncanny resemblance or what..?
 
Golgo13:The Hitman said:
Juno ( Natalie Mendoza)
300natalie_mendoza.jpg


Tina from Mtv's The Real World:
281x211tina.jpg


..uncanny resemblance or what..?
Click to expand...

naaaw. a lot of filipinas look a like. i think she looks like my ex-gf, whos filipina. but then again i could say that about almost any two you could pick out. :woot:


but i think it would be cool if the sequel was about the cave divers who left that piece of equipment above that abyss.

how juno said nobody has used that equipment for a hundred years... wut do u guys think?
 
Yeah, i'd prefer if the sequel was actually a prequel. Maybe they could touch on how the cave dwellers actually came to be. They're obviously evolved from Pimates/Humans. Would be nice if at least they'd show a cave painting of their evolution..or something.

Maybe the equipment that the girls found were the ancestors of the cave dwellers themselves, as opposed to their victims. They got lost trapped in the cave, and evolved into the dwellers....:huh:
 
Looks like the love child of a bat and a mutant
 
Blah. It doesn't even look like the creatures from the first one.

I hate the fact that they are going with the dream ending and not the real one. I'm not supporting this movie. The original is one of my favorite movies ever.
 
Pathe Films has renamed their sequel to Neil Marshall's "The Descent" to simply "The Descent: Part 2" reports Bloody Disgusting.

The sequel will continue the story of Sarah, the only survivor of an all-female caving expedition gone horrifically wrong.

Unable to speak due to the psychological stress, she accompanies a rescue team back to the cave, but events once again take a sinister turn.

No word yet on a release date from Lionsgate, though sometime next year is estimated.
 
Ugh, I hated the Descent, doubt I'll see this.
 
Galactus said:
Pathe Films has renamed their sequel to Neil Marshall's "The Descent" to simply "The Descent: Part 2" reports Bloody Disgusting.

The sequel will continue the story of Sarah, the only survivor of an all-female caving expedition gone horrifically wrong.

Unable to speak due to the psychological stress, she accompanies a rescue team back to the cave, but events once again take a sinister turn.

No word yet on a release date from Lionsgate, though sometime next year is estimated.
Click to expand...
i will watch it. but hte edning to the first movie was awsome because you didnt know exactly what happened.
this movie basicly explains what did.
to bad.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)

Staff online

Members online

Total: 3,940 (members: 30, guests: 3,910)

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,301
Messages
22,082,514
Members
45,883
Latest member
Smotonri

Share this page

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"