• Super Maintenance

    Xenforo Cloud upgraded our forum to XenForo version 2.3.4. This update has created styling issues to our current templates.

    Starting January 9th, site maintenance is ongoing until further notice, but please report any other issues you may experience so we can look into.

    We apologize for the inconvenience.

  • X/Twitter

    Due to recent news involving X, formerly Twitter and its owner, the staff of SuperHeroHype have decided it would be best to no longer allow links on the board. Starting January 31st, users will no longer be able to post direct links to X on this site, however screenshots will still be allowed as long as they follow Hype rules and guidelines.

    We apologize for any inconvenience.

The Imitation Game (Alan Turing Biopic)

I thought this film was really good. The film was very gripping.

Mark Strong sure can play a shady spy well.

The way people talked about this film glossing over his homosexuality seemed off the mark when I saw the film.

They didn't shy away from Turing's sexuality at all. Short of a sex scene with a rent boy I'm not sure what more people expected.

Without going into spoilers his sexuality is presented as a big part of who he is but it isn't all that defines him.


That one particular author apparently has little credibility in anything.

Here's the review of the film from the Boston Gay Times:

The verdict:
Alan Turing’s life is one of incomprehensible injustice. It’s the tale of a man whose code breaking skills saved British society from fascism, but who’s life was subsequently destroyed by breaking that society’s own code.

Telling his story is decades overdue. This is partly due to the Official Secrets Act, which kept his extraordinary contribution to the war effort secret for almost 50 years. But it also has a lot to do with his sexuality; he was cast out as a pariah for his willingness to be himself.

In many senses The Imitation Game is telling two very different stories: that of a genius and war hero, and that of a maligned man living in a world he was decades ahead of. These two stark tales struggle to sit side-by-side, as the film skips around his life, often feeling as though important chunks have been missed. It can be difficult, to this end, to feel in sync with the story.

But what the film does get across is the sense of injustice: both of war, and for the millions of men like Alan – he was given the 'choice' of chemical castration or imprisonment after being found ‘guilty’ of ‘gross indecency’. Graham Moor’s stunning script conveys the dark injustice of the story in a way that few would manage. For a 31-year-old American on his first major film, what he’s produced is exceptional.

The Imitation Game is well worth seeing. As a film telling a part of our shared gay history, it lags behind the likes of Pride. But as a message it speaks volumes: pardoning Alan Turing, and the men and women like him, is not enough. We owe so much to them, they deserve celebration. As such this film, too, should be celebrated.

GT gives it: 4/5
 
If they focussed too much on the unjust "gross indecency" law that was used to persecute Turing and not on his achievements, then you might as well not have made a film about Turing at all. Alot of men suffered under that law, maybe some of them even suffered more. Why not a film about any of them then? The kind of film the bitter loser who wrote that review would have wanted to see could well have been made about the 19-year-old rentboy that got Turing into trouble, not about that man who helped win World War Two with his brain.

Not to be harsh but it sort of sounds like you're saying unless you can make a film about all the cruelties gay people have suffered than you shouldn't make any films about gay people who have suffered.

Turing was a hero and his treatment was especially atrocious because of the wonderful things he did for people which makes him unique and a hero
 
Not to be harsh but it sort of sounds like you're saying unless you can make a film about all the cruelties gay people have suffered than you shouldn't make any films about gay people who have suffered.

Turing was a hero and his treatment was especially atrocious because of the wonderful things he did for people which makes him unique and a hero


My post was in response to Devin Faraci, who criticized the movie for not focussing as much on Turing's sexuality and details of his mistreatment by police, and instead focussing on his important work in computer science and during WW2. My view was the blogger's accusations that this movie "glossed over" his sexuality and the injustice are unfounded.
 
My post was in response to Devin Faraci, who criticized the movie for not focussing as much on Turing's sexuality and details of his mistreatment by police, and instead focussing on his important work in computer science and during WW2. My view was the blogger's accusations that this movie "glossed over" his sexuality and the injustice are unfounded.

Ok, you talked me into it so I saw it today.

Suprise! I loved it. I really wish they hadn't made as much of a point of glossing over his sexuality with the marketing as they did because it created a controversy where there was none.

The film is beautiful, well told and doesn't straight wash Turing with Joan. I actually loved the love story in this film.

I wonder if, like Helen mirren playing the queen, if cumberbatch could be persuaded to keep reprising the role to see other parts of his life? I would watch that
 
Ok, you talked me into it so I saw it today.

Suprise! I loved it. I really wish they hadn't made as much of a point of glossing over his sexuality with the marketing as they did because it created a controversy where there was none.

The film is beautiful, well told and doesn't straight wash Turing with Joan. I actually loved the love story in this film.

I wonder if, like Helen mirren playing the queen, if cumberbatch could be persuaded to keep reprising the role to see other parts of his life? I would watch that


Good on ya, son. :up:

In today's times, every fool with a computer can call himself a gay cultural historian, so every time a movie gets made about a prominent gay person, there will always be at least one squeaky voice out there accusing it of internalized homophobia.
 
Finally watched this today. I thought it did a smooth job working in both directions as both a condemnation of social injustice that made its point without being preachy, and an engrossing espionage war drama. Cumberbatch was very good.

I watched Selma a couple days ago. I preferred this, and thought Cumberbatch was better than Oyelowo (who was also good).
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"