TheCorpulent1
SHAZAM!
- Joined
- Jun 20, 2001
- Messages
- 154,474
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
Oh, well I didn't know there was a precedent for it. It's kind of a stupid precedent, but that's neither here nor there. I'll edit my numbers to reflect that.
see, by this logic that they should count because enough time has passed, i could vote for kang 24 times right now, not come back for a day, and bam they count because enough time has passed where i couldve made those votes. extreme, but basically the same thing.

Kang's only about a thousand times better than the Lizard, dude.![]()
And that would be fine so long as we didn't take Kang off the board if your votes made him hit zero, because we'd also factor in everybody else's posts over that period and it would come out to the same numbers as if you'd voted diligently every hour for a day. It's the net effect that really matters, isn't it? And besides, you know the rules, so you wouldn't do that in the first place. Just seems kind of lame to disqualify a person's votes because of ignorance of the rules, which, I hasten to add, were not posted in the first post of this thread. If this is the first Marvel Eliminations thread Tim has voted in, how could he know what the rules are?see, by this logic that they should count because enough time has passed, i could vote for kang 24 times right now, not come back for a day, and bam they count because enough time has passed where i couldve made those votes. extreme, but basically the same thing.
Does anyone know how many posts it takes to be able to use an avatar?