Chewy
REDACTED
- Joined
- Mar 25, 2005
- Messages
- 13,000
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
Yeah, but only if you include the marketing.apparently this film cost over $300mill
is that true?
Yeah, but only if you include the marketing.apparently this film cost over $300mill
is that true?
I'm gonna take a shot in the dark and say this movie is going to need box office numbers similar to the original Iron Man movie to get a sequel, if not more.
I'm gonna take a shot in the dark and say this movie is going to need box office numbers similar to the original Iron Man movie to get a sequel, if not more.
I'm pretty sure the general audience doesn't really differentiate between which are DC and which are Marvel superheroes.
It really wasn't that solid. It was just sort of ok. And then it clearly got committeed to death.I can't believe the script is bad. What happened to the script some people on these boards read, the one that was supposed to be solid?
With marketing Thor probably cost 250M. FC somewhere between 200M and 250M. It's not really that surprising. Budgets that you see reported generally never include marketing.
Yeah, but it sucked. Why does the gross seem more important to some of you than the actual quality of the movie?Let's also not forget last year's "Clash of The Titans". It had bad reviews, and yet it did fine commercially and it's getting a sequel. So let's wait and see....
I'm wondering the same thing. That was the first thing people assured me was rock-solid, when I asked about it months ago.I can't believe the script is bad. What happened to the script some people on these boards read, the one that was supposed to be solid?
Batman Begins made 372 mil World Wide with 205 coming in domestic. You really think those return numbers on a 300 mil investment will prompt WB to greenlit a sequel? especially considering the Cirtical panning and bad taste that will be attached to the sequel in the general audiences mind.it won't even get close to iron man money.
if it does close to batman begins money, i think they may consider a sequel.
I'll call people out whenever I think that it's necessary. So step aside.
It wasn't rock solid. It had a ton of problems.I'm wondering the same thing. That was the first thing people assured me was rock-solid, when I asked about it months ago.
Batman Begins made 372 mil World Wide with 205 coming in domestic. You really think those return numbers on a 300 mil investment will prompt WB to greenlit a sequel? especially considering the Cirtical panning and bad taste that will be attached to the sequel in the general audiences mind.
There were some good things about that script but also a lot of problems. I think people were assuming "rewrites = fixes", when instead it appears that they made it significantly worse.I'm wondering the same thing. That was the first thing people assured me was rock-solid, when I asked about it months ago.
There were some good things about that script but also a lot of problems. I think people were assuming "rewrites = fixes", when instead it appears that they made it significantly worse.
I'll go see GL regardless of the reviews. If it sucks, it'll be a pity, but i'll at least give it a shot despite the critics. They are wrong sometimes, after all.![]()