Iron Man 2 The only thing we need to know now is..

[[A]]

..the runtime. How long you think it will be..? I'm thinking close to the 2h30m -- the first one was a little over 2h, if I remember well..

 

[Iron_Stark]

With the addition to the extra characters and everything I say 2:30 or however long the Dark Knight was.

 

[kedrell]

Well I seriously doubt it'll be shorter than the first movie, which as you said was an even 2hrs if you don't count the credits.

 

[Perfect Cell]

I'd prefer a length of about 2:15, but I wouldn't be opposed to a 2:30 runtime. Anything above that, or less than 2 hours, would be inappropriate I would think.

 

[Aesop Rocks]

3 years 2 months 3 days and 15 minutes and 96 seconds.

 

[samsnee]

2 hrs is enough. 2 and half will feel bloated.

 

[protocida]

2h40min.

 

[Nirvana]

2 hrs is good enough. No need for a 2 hrs 30 mins+ Iron Man film.

 

[kedrell]

2:00-2:30 is a good range for it to fall in. Whatever it takes to tell the story right.

 

[Aesop Rocks]

2:15 is what I would like.

 

[StarkTheProdigy]

im happy as long as its atleast 2 hours,

 

[[A]]

I'd like it to be closer to 2h30m

 

[kedrell]

I tend to think a longer runtime is good only if it's actually needed to tell the story. If they're doing it just to shut the time-sensitive fan boys up, then that's a poor reason.

 

[powerbomb1411]

Some movies are wonderful with long run times. Zodiac was over 2 1/2 hours and it didn't feel that long to me at all.

 

[kedrell]

I just hate it when they neuter the story by aiming for the shortest runtime possible, or in other words...the FOX method.

 

[protocida]

There's a big story (From the Spoilers and Trailers) and I believe everyone wants good lenghty action scenes. 2h35min would do it for me.

 

[kedrell]

Well as I said, I want the runtime to fit the story. No trimming to get more screenings per day; no bloating as well.

 

[protocida]

2:35 sounds fit for me.

 

[Mr. Earle]

First of all, shouldnt the title of this thread be more informative? You need to open it to learn what its about.

Second, what is the point of this thread? Arguing whether 2:20 is better or worse than 2:25?

No offense.

 

[[A]]

First of all, shouldnt the title of this thread be more informative? You need to open it to learn what its about

Mouse over the title and you see what a thread is about.

 

[Figs]

I'm happy with at least a solid 2 hours. If it goes over that I'll be even happier.

 

[BobJM]

I'm thinking a little over 2 hours.

 

[Iron Mandarin]

The longer,the better! Thats what she said.

 

[rashad]

I think it'll be around Spider-Man 2's runtime of 128 minutes. Which I thing should be the minimum for any comic book film. Anything over is a bonus.

 

[Keyser Soze]

2 hours sounds fair to me.