Congratulations to you both for your stance of trust but verify on the list.
Heaps of derision on those of you who accepted it as gospel on face value, or commented on it without acknowledgement of the questionable veracity of some of its claims.
Personally, I see absolutely no legal reason the man couldn't be part owner of the team. On the other hand, the NFL is a special case monopoly with their own rules about who can and can't buy a team and if I were an owner and I thought it would negatively impact the perception of the league and possibly cost me money if he were part of the ownership I'd not vote approval. And I'm cool with that if that's how it plays out. That's business.
Professionally, I have no sympathy for the players. The man who runs my company is a blowhard whom I believe to be a liar, in no way trustworthy and a rather morally repugnant human being from my limited interaction with him. My choice is to walkif it gripes my constitution to that degree, as is the players option. That's business and that's just the way it is.
That said, if I were leading the management group, I'd dump him in a heart beat if it looked like he was going to cost me the chance at buying a cash machine that is an NFL franchise. That's business and I see nothing wrong with it.
All in all, I don't care. NCAA is where it's at if you ask me so until he tries to by a university in the SEC it's very, very, very meh to me.
and 
for good measure.
