The Technology Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.

DJ_KiDDvIcIOUs

Avenger
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
25,025
Reaction score
10
Points
33
This thread is dedicated to all the happenings in the world of business and new announcements in the ever advancing world of Technology. So pop a squat and find out what's happening with all the companies you care about!
 
Netflix To Pay Comcast to Not Ruin Your Evenings

ku-xlarge.jpg


In a landmark deal, Netflix has agreed to pay Comcast for direct access to the company's broadband system. The announcement comes after months of dispute between Netflix and broadband providers about who should pay for increasing bandwidth loads.

If you haven't been following the streaming wars, here's the basic gist: As Netflix has grown, an argument over who should pay for the increasing loads—the broadband provider or Netflix—has emerged. In the meantime, Netflix has been buying its bandwidth from a company called Cogent, which acts as the middle man between Netflix and Comcast or Verizon, which in turn deliver the stream to you. But that agreement hasn't worked out very well.

Under this new deal, Netflix will access Comcast's network directly—or, almost directly, according to the Wall Street Journal, which first reported the news this afternoon. "Under the deal, Netflix won't be able to place its servers inside Comcast's data centers, which Netflix had wanted," the paper explains. "Instead, Comcast will connect to Netflix's servers at data centers operated by other companies."

The deal was confirmed in a joint statement:

Comcast Corporation and Netflix, Inc. today announced a mutually beneficial interconnection agreement that will provide Comcast's U.S. broadband customers with a high-quality Netflix video experience for years to come. Working collaboratively over many months, the companies have established a more direct connection between Netflix and Comcast, similar to other networks, that's already delivering an even better user experience to consumers, while also allowing for future growth in Netflix traffic. Netflix receives no preferential network treatment under the multi-year agreement, terms of which are not being disclosed.
According to the WSJ, the deal was struck in January at CES, and that the details of the agreement were hammered out earlier this month.

What does this all mean for you? For one thing, Comcast customers are due to see some serious improvement when it comes to streaming video. But it's an ominous sign for the ongoing battle for net neutrality—a far more complex issue at stake here. In January, a federal court dealt a death blow to net neutrality when it struck down the FCC's open Internet rules, which demand, essentially, that all data be treated equal.

That decision opened up the possibility that broadband providers—like Comcast—could start giving specific companies—like Netflix—preferential treatment. But for now, it's still unclear what, if anything, this definitive agreement could mean for net neutrality.

http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702304834704579401071892041790

This does not bode well for net neutrality in my eyes but only time will tell
 
Mozilla to Unveil $25 Burner Smartphone

At this weekend's Mobile World Congress in Barcelona, Mozilla revealed their development plans for a simplified smartphone that will cost around $25. Partnered with low-cost chip developer Spreadtrum, Mozilla claims the phone will have internet capabilities and app browsing, but at a lower speed and a much cheaper cost.

The brand most associated with the Firefox browser explained details at the conference that show the phone's intended audience to be the developing world. The Mozilla take will be somewhere in between "dumb" phones with just calling capabilities and more popular "feature" phones, a sort of antiquated version of a smartphone.

"These solutions expand the global accessibility of open web smartphones to first-time and entry-level smartphone buyers by reducing the time and cost required for handset makers to bring these devices to market," said Spreadtrum in a press statement.
The phones will run on the Mozilla operating system, giving your crappy friends the opportunity to scoff and say, "Ugh, you still don't use Chrome?"

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-26316265

I see this as a great thing for those in developing countries. Cheap access to smartphones can only help the world grow
 
Samsung Galaxy S5: Everything We Think We Know

We're almost certainly about to see Samsung's Galaxy S5 superphone next week, the long-awaited followup to the company's Android flagship. With competition heating up from the likes of Motorola and HTC, will it be enough to stay near the top of the heap? Here's what we're expecting to see.

Design

While there wasn't a huge difference between the S3 and S4, the jump from S4 to S5 will supposedly bring a phone that "feels" more premium, according to statements to Bloomberg from a Samsung exec. That lines up with a Sammobile report that Samsung is finally ditching the cheap-feeling plastic frame, and moving onto a metal unibody design. About time!

The display that body houses will reportedly be a slightly larger 5.2 inches. Emphasis on slightly, as the S4 measures up at 5 inches, but the size bump makes sense given the general embiggening-of-phones trend.

Update: As dug up by TechCrunch, purported images of the S5 have popped up on some smaller Android rumor sites like SaudiAndroid and HardwareZone. They seem to align with what we've heard, but take them with a grain of salt:

ku-xlarge.jpg


ku-xlarge.png


19gokhfilyea9jpg.jpg


Specs

Let's get the obvious out of the way first. The Galaxy S5 will have a sharper screen. Duh. This is almost a guarantee, because you expect that screens will keep improving. But just how much better? According to @evleaks, a smartphone rumor-tweeting account with a fairly reliable track record for actually getting things right, it will have a QHD 2K display with a resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels. That's a pretty good upgrade next to the S4, which had a 1920x1080 Super AMOLED display, and it would give the S5 an edge over the Nexus 5's 1920x1080 IPS-LCD display, as well as over the HTC One's 1920x1080 Super LCD 3. @evleaks has also dropped some evidence that the phone will have a 3D viewer. Why you'd want that on a smartphone is unclear, but Samsung's never shied away from gimmicks before.

Next up? A significantly better battery, reportedly coming in at 4,000 mAh to the S4's 2,600 mAh power pack. Battery might not be one of the most exciting specs, but it's certainly one of the most important, and it's one area where we've really started to see Android phones excel. And with other Google operating system-running phones on the market boasting batteries that can last two days on a single charge (the Droid Maxx, the LG G Flex, to name a few), Samsung would be crazy not to drastically improve on this front. Depending on other factors like chip size, screen resolution, and usage habits, 4,000 mAh should, in theory, last even longer than two days on one charge.

While there had been some fleeting rumors about iris recognition, a more reliable report from SamMobile says that the S5 will actually have a fingerprint scanner similar to the iPhone 5S. It would be on the home button and be able to register up to eight different paw prints. Apparently, you'd also be able to assign different tasks or open apps based on what finger you're pressing with, which sounds so bat**** and unnecessary that it just might be true. Despite contradictory rumors that the phone will ditch all of is onscreen buttons, it seems likely that fingerprint recognition will play at least some part in next week's announcement.

It's also pretty much a gimme that the S5 will have a better camera. Accordingly, the rumor that's been kicking around for a while is that the fifth-gen Galaxy guy will sport a 16-megapixeler. The last Galaxy had a 13MP lens, whereas, say the iPhone 5S has 8 megapixels. But megapixels really don't matter so much as what the shutter speed is like, or how a camera deals with low light, and camera software overall.

Lastly, there are a few miscellaneous rumors kicking around. Apparently the phone will have 64-bit Exynos processor or a Snapdragon 800 chip. The S4 was powered by a Snapdragon 600 chip, so an 800 seems like a logical upgrade, especially because that's the chip that the good recent Androids (like the Xperia Z1) and even the bad ones (like the LG G2) are powered by. The S5 is also expected to have 3GB of RAM, and will run Android 4.4.2 KitKat, which again, is a fairly safe bet since it's the current Android OS. But it may lose some of the Samsung customization.

Pocketlint accidentally posted its review early, and although its been taken down, we were able to cull some details from screenshots. Among them are that the S5 definitely has a fingerprint scanner, and that the phone is getting a silver metal-looking back that's actually still plastic. Additionally, the review confirms the 16-megapixel camera, with a few new features such as one called Selective focus which lets you refocus the picture after you've snapped it.

ku-xlarge.jpg


Interface

One of the rumors we're more hopefully on is that Samsung will finally tone down its use of unnecessary proprietary apps that don't serve much purpose other than slowing things down and being a battery drain. By all means! Because the UI is one of the chief concerns with Galaxies past. Samsung has hinted that the entire interface will get a redesign, but we'll see.

Availability

According to a recent interview given to Bloomberg, Samsung says the phone will be out by April. This would be consistent with Samsung's past habits with the Galaxy line, which is generally refreshed around March or April.

However, there's a pretty strong chance the S5 will rear its head earlier than that. Next week is Mobile World Congress in Barcelona, and Samsung is hosting Unpacked, an event it'll also livestream in New York. Most tech press seem to agree this is the place Samsung will Vanna White the S5. Now, there's a chance that it's round two of Galaxy Gear, or even something else entirely. But we'll see come Monday.

Actual availability is a little less clear. The most recent report—via Gsmarena—puts the phone on sale three weeks from now.

Price

Okay, so the purported specs of the S5 might not be much to write home about, but what if the phone was $100 on contract, half the price of its forebear? There have been rumblings via Bloomberg that it might be. But there's also a chance that this is just analyst wankery. However, you can be sure it won't be more than $200, which is where the S4 started.

http://gizmodo.com/samsung-galaxy-s5-everything-we-think-we-know-1526106374

I prefer HTC myself but this is going to have a lot of cool features
 
Nokia X: The First Nokia Androids

19gnr3j3wvcbfjpg.jpg


After much heavy rumor, Nokia has just announced that it's launching its first Android handsets: the X, X+ and XL.

All the phones are built on the open source Android OS forked especially for Nokia. The X and X+ feature a 4-inch screen, while the XL packs a 5-inch IPS display. The X+ is differentiated from the X by extra memory and expandable storage, though it's not clear quite what that means in terms of specs.

In terms of specs, all three will have a 1GHz dual-core Qualcomm Snapdragon processor, dual SIM, microSD support and 1500mAh battery. The X has: a 4-inch IPS LCD display (800 x 480), 512MB RAM, 3MP camera and will be available in green, black, white, yellow, cyan and red. The X+ is similar but offers 768MB RAM and a 4GB MicroSD card. Finally, the Nokia XL has a larger 5-inch display (800 x 480), 768MB RAM, 5MP rear-facing camera and front-facing 2MP camera.

During the Mobile World Congress presentation, Steve Elop explained that users will "benefit from the Android apps and ecosystem, but we have differentiated." Essentially that means that there will plenty of Microsoft and Nokia apps included from the get go. Skype, for instance, will be preinstalled, and offer users 1 month of free calls to landlines and mobiles, and Nokia's navigation apps will feature, too.

More importantly, the phones take people to Microsoft's cloud, not Google's. Indeed, it seems Nokia is distancing itself from Google as much as possible with these Android devices, and Elop went as far as saying that the "Nokia X together with Lumia represents a deliberate strategy to leverage Microsoft services." There will, though, be plenty—"hundreds of thousands at launch," apparently—of conventional Android apps available through a Nokia-specific app store. SwiftKey, the swypey keyboard, will be available on the X range for free.

ku-xlarge.jpg


Perhaps unsurprisingly, the UI of the X range looks like a blend of Windows Phone and Android: there's a glance screen just like the company's Windows Phone models, and colorful tile-like home screen where apps sit in brightly colored bars. But there's the same familiar Android notification bar across the top, and some subtly tweaked folders and widgets that mirror Google's OS, too.

Interestingly, despite the Microsoft focus, you will be able to sideload apps—including those made by Google, in fact, any APK—though some may, apparently, need recompiling to run properly on Nokia's forked version of the OS.

Price, you ask? Well, Steve Elop was keen to point out that the X range is designed to be more affordable than the Lumia range, both now and in the the future. The phone will be "broadly available globally", starting in growth markets, and they'll cost $125 for the X, $135 for the X+, and $150 for the XL.

They're certainly cheap, then, but it's hard to say whether that represents good value or not. Let's wait and see when we get our hands on one.

http://gizmodo.com/nokia-x-the-first-nokia-android-1529525060

Interesting, I know a few folks who had their Windows phone and seemed to really like them. I know their cameras are supposed to be sick. Will be interesting to see how the work with the Android OS which I prefer
 
This MicroSD Card Packs Massive Capacity into a Minute Form Factor

ku-xlarge.jpg


At the company's Mobile World Congress in Barcelona, Spain, SanDisk announced today the imminent release of the single largest-capacity MicroSD card ever created. This tiny storage medium offers an unprecedented 128 GB of space, but don't expect it to come cheap.

The 128GB SanDisk Ultra microSDXC™ UHS-I memory card provides desktop computer amounts of storage in your mobile device—thousands of hours of music and hundreds of hours of video. The need for cloud storage options to supplement the paltry 16 - 32 GB of local hard drive space have suddenly become a moot point. This breakthrough marks a magnitude increase in storage since the first Micro SD card hit the market a decade ago with just 128 MB of space

"Until now, consumers had to spread out their content between multiple products because the memory on those devices was not able to hold enough data in one place," explained Stuart Robinson, the director of Handset Component Technologies, Strategy Analytics, said in a press release. "This 128GB microSD card is going to be popular as the preferred removable storage option, giving users fast, secure and reliable access to their personal data archives." What's more, the new MicroSD card will include access to a new version of the SanDisk Memory Zone app which enables users to view, access, and backup locally stored files from a mobile device's internal storage, transferring them to the the new card.

The new line of Ultra microSDXC cards will span from 8GB to 128GB and run between $30 and $200 when they go on sale tomorrow at BestBuy.com and Amazon.com.

http://gizmodo.com/this-microsd-card-packs-massive-capacity-into-a-minute-1521721940

Awesome! I have been wanting to upgrade my SD card for a while and was thinking about doing it soon. I def will have no problem dropping $200 on 128 GBs of space. I hardly take pics or video but I stuff my phone with music. I'll have 64 GB of personal music to listen to and 64 GB of DJ tunes on my phone to rock parties on the fly when I don't have my harddrive with me. Love this news! :woot:
 
I remember when I upgraded my SD card from a 16 megabyte to a 1 gb card and how it would take forever to fill it with pictures from the digital camera. That was roughly a decade ago. I don't think they even make cards with less than a gigabyte of capacity.
 
Ya I think the smallest SD card you can get now is 8 gbs. I just bought a new external harddrive and 2 years ago 1 tb was $100 now you get 2 tb for that and I paid an extra $20 for another freakin 1 tb. Crazy how fast it moves
 
128 GB, wow. I have a 16gb in my phone and it takes me a long time to fill that up. I have movies, music, novels, audiobooks and much more and I still have 3-4 gb left free.

Also I have a Galaxy S2 and I love it. I don't see the obsession with getting newer and newer phones all the time. I only got a cell 5 years ago and got my S2 after the S3 came out. S5, geez.
 
Holy hell. Talk about plug and play.

That's awesome.
 
Isn't it sexy? I would treat that thing better than any girlfriend I've ever had.
 
That kinda revolutionizes how we set up PCs now, doesn't it
 
No more lugging around towers. Awesome. Can't wait for this to be standardized.
 
Wow that's a pc right there. I think that thing just taught me how to feel love again
 
This Hearing Aid Connects to an iPhone and Adapts to Your Surroundings

19gp99dfg3n1qjpg.jpg


For centuries, humans have been using technology to make up for their shortcomings. People missing limbs got prosthetics. People with weak hearts got pacemakers. But, at a certain point, becoming a cyborg is less like fixing something broken than it is like gaining new powers.

Such is the case with the brand-spanking new ReSound LiNX hearing aid. The futuristic device is equipped with a 2.4 GHz wireless technology and Bluetooth so you can connect to your iPhone, iPad, or iPod Touch. This lets the wearer stream sounds—music, phone calls, etc.—straight to a hearing aid without wires or extra attachments. It also gives the hearing aid itself a whole new set of features thanks to a mobile app.

Most impressive: the app uses geotagging settings to remember the wearer's optimal settings in frequently visited places like offices or restaurants. The hearing aid actually responds to what's going on around you, and it remembers how you like things to sound in specific locations.

On top of all that, the ReSound LiNX also promises to be one of the best hearing aids on the market, as far as sound quality is concerned. It's hard to know if that's true without actually taking the thing out for a spin, but it's also obvious that this is not the be-all and end-all of hearing aids. With all those features, the device is pretty bulky, and all that Bluetooth connectivity can't be great for battery life.

Nevertheless, the idea of an automatic built-in equalizer for life sounds great even for people who aren't hearing impaired. That's one point for the cyborgs.

19gp9bq9wgjakjpg.jpg

http://www.businesswire.com/news/ho...ound-LiNX™-Revolutionary-Hearing#.UwuG_yugkhG

As a DJ I know I'm going to need something like this down the line eventually so always glad to see advancements in this
 
Now you'll see seniors boogeying down the street to their hearing aids.
 
Samsung's Gear Fit Is a Tiny Smartwatch and a Hot Fitness Tracker in One

ku-xlarge.jpg


In addition to the two new Samsung Gear smartwatches we got saw a few days ago, Samsung is actually showing us something new in its wearable line: The Gear Fit, a combination smartwatch and fitness tracker. It's svelte and slick—and potentially the gorgeous functional wearable we've been waiting for.

The new Samsung wearable has a curved Super AMOLED touchscreen display measuring 1.84 inches. Its dimensions are 23.4 x 57.4 x 11.95 mm, and it weighs just 27 grams—half the weight of Samsung's lightest smartwatch to date, the Gear Neo.

ku-xlarge.jpg


The Gear Fit replicated many of the functions of the Gear we've already seen, including the capability to receive incoming calls, emails, SMS messages, alarms, as well as notifications from S-planner.

ku-xlarge.jpg


Besides the form factor change, it's not immediately apparent what sets the Gear Fit apart from its brethren. It's got built in Gyrocope, accelerometer, and heart rate monitor. The Gear Fit can measure a host of fitness metrics, including pedometer, exercise level, heart rate, sleep time, as well as a stopwatch and timer.

The Gear Fit has a 210 mAh battery which Samsung says will get it 3-4 days of battery life.

All in all, it looks like a very interesting device that's sleeker than the clunk Galaxy Gear/ Gear 2 that came before. Sadly, it appears it only works with Galaxy devices.

Here's the skinny. Most fitness trackers don't have heart rate monitors yet, which makes them much less of a compelling buy. So it's exciting that the Gear Fit has one. Provided that it works. We got to spend a few minutes with it at the New York press event, and it took it a couple tries to actually give a reading. We had to make sure it was on very tightly before it worked.

The Gear Fit is pretty much a pared down version of Galaxy Gear. It's smaller and lighter and much more comfortable. But that't not to say that it doesn't have any heft. For it to have an LCD screen it has to have some.

The interface is pretty basic and easy to use. There's a stop watch, a timer, a section where you can track your activity, a watch, and a music player. It's straightforward and easy to use. But it's not the most stylish piece of wristwear, although that's not at all surprising considering the existence of Galaxy Gear in the first place.

http://gizmodo.com/samsungs-galaxy-fit-is-a-smartwatch-and-a-fitness-trac-1529854495

Very cool, HTC needs to get on one of these for their phones or I may just jump ship
 
The Privacy-Pimping Blackphone Is Here to Lock Up Your Data

ku-xlarge.png


Paranoid? Privacy conscious? Somewhere in between? Well there's now an unlocked (forked) Android phone for you. Blackphone is on the scene and it looks as discrete as it keeps all your juicy info.

We heard about Blackphone a while ago, but now SilentCircle and Geeksphone have officially unveiled it at Mobile World Congress with a starting price of $630 and a body that's actually pretty sweet. Running a forked version of Android called PrivatOS, Blackphone mixes the power and app ecosystem of Google's mobile OS with a layer of security-saving software designed to keep the creepers off your back.

Blackphone's custom suite of apps centers mostly around Silent Phone for encrypted VoIP; Silent Text, for encrypted messaging; and Silent Contacts, for an encrypted contact list other apps can't peek at. All of these are available on iOS and vanilla Android for a price, but a Blackphone comes with two years of service included.

As for the phone itself, it's a subtle, sleek little guy, with some pretty decent specs, at least so far as Silent Circle and Geeksphone are willing to talk about them: A 4.7-inch HD (resolution unknown), IPS display, a 2GHz quad-core processor, 16GB of storage, an 8-megapixel camera, LTE. All the essentials.

But don't plan on trying to hide from the NSA. While Blackphone is privacy conscious, it's not fool-proof. SilentCircle openly admits that no phone is NSA-proof. Besides, adopting a whole bunch of encryption is basically begging the NSA to come breathe down your neck.

But if you're looking to keep your data to yourself and away from less sophisticated snoops like data-harvesting apps and run-of-the-mill cyberstalkers, Blackphone's got your back. You can preorder one starting today.

http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2014-02/24/blackphone-hands-on

Very cool
 
Intel's New Atom Chips Are Just Waiting For Phones to Catch Up

ku-xlarge.jpg


Today at Mobile World Congress, Intel launched its latest dual-core 64-bit mobile processor, Merrifield, and spilled some of the beans on its upcoming follow-up, the quad-cored Moorefield. Now they're just looking for some devices to jump into.

Merrifeld, aka Intel Atom processor Z3480, runs on Intel's 22nm Silvermont microarchitecture, boasting speeds of 2.13GHz, and according to Intel, power-efficiency that rivals ARM-based chips. It'll start showing up in handsets sometime the second quarter of this year.

Moorefield meanwhile, ups the ante with an additional two cores to bring its speed up to 2.3GHz, and increased graphics capability. Moorefield won't be showing up in the wild until the second half of this year. According to Intel's benchmarks, both new chips beat out Apple's A7 and Qualcomm's Snapdragon 800, but those chips are no spring chickens anyway.

Intel has plans in place to throw its new chips in devices from Foxconn, Asus, and Lenovo, all of whom have have gone Intel before. And with those devices could come the first 64-bit version of Android, which was beaten to the punch by the long 64-bit iOS 7 and A7 pairings. That said, going 64-bit is mostly about the long game anyway.

Expect a few more Intel-powered phones to be coming your way soon, and fancy new 64-bit version of Android for them to run. But while Intel's certainly starting to catch up in the mobile game, there's never been a really killer phone with Intel inside. So even though Intel's making moves, it could still be a while before they're powering something you want.

http://blog.laptopmag.com/intel-new-64-bit-atom-chips

Lot's of cool news coming out of Mobile World Congress today
 
The Military's Newest Drone Can Roam Up to 1800 Miles From Home

ku-xlarge.jpg


The rapid exit of US ground forces from Afghanistan has caused an unforseen problem for forces in the region: Afghanistan's most remote regions are suddenly out of range of our conventional turbo-prop UAVs, making CIA interdiction against the Taliban nearly impossible. But a new generation of jet-propelled Predator drone will soon take to the skies and venture up to 1800 miles from its base.

With the recent falling out between the Obama and Karzai administrations, all US troops have to be out of Afghanistan by the end of the year. However, the Los Angeles Times reports that without the use of Afghan airbases—which require direct US military protection—many American UAVs lack the endurance and range to continue surveillance and strike operations in northwest Pakistan, where the Taliban has been making steady inroads since the US announced its withdrawal. And that's where the new General Atomics Avenger comes in.

In development since 2009, the Avenger is an advanced third-generation prototype (following the MQ-1 Predator and MQ-9 Reaper) of the vaunted Predator drone system. However, unlike its predecessors, the Avenger utilizes a turbofan engine rather than a conventional turboprop. While the platform's performance specs haven't been publicly released yet, GA engineers have estimated that the Avenger will meet or exceed the capabilities of the Reaper—hitting a top speed of at least 500 mph with a 50,000-foot operational ceiling and operating for up to 18 hours at a time.

Additionally, the new Avenger is four feet longer than its predecessor with a 66-foot wingspan. This provides more room for internal weapons storage—3,500 pounds in total—or additional fuel for longer loiter times. What's more, the Avenger will carry the same weapon load-out as the Reaper—a deadly mix of Paveway II laser-guided bombs, Hellfire II A-G missiles, Sidewinder A-A missiles, and JDAMs.

[YT]9-Km2pe0B3o[/YT]

Most importantly, the Avenger's turbofan engine will provide just enough range to allow these vital unmanned aerial vehicles to continue to monitor the volatile and remote regions of Pakistan without the need to put American troops in danger.

http://gizmodo.com/the-militarys-newest-drone-can-roam-up-to-1800-miles-f-1528044906

The war machine keeps on trucking. But anything that keeps our boys safe and gets the bad guys is good in my book. Just wish they had a better track record for taking out enemies and not civilians
 
why do you hate it? im not about to argue I'm just curious. I hate when big companies wheel and deal because it rarely ever means its good for the consumer....
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"