- Joined
- Sep 14, 2008
- Messages
- 40,446
- Reaction score
- 6,223
- Points
- 103
Carpenter's remake is textbook as to how to approach to make a great remake.
Carpenter's remake is textbook as to how to approach to make a great remake.
Exactly. Carpenter's The Thing is no more a remake of The Thing From Another World than Nolan's The Dark Knight is a remake of Burton's Batman.Not really much of a "remake" since there is no such film in 1951 called "The Thing" just The Thing from Another World and second, they are 2 very completely different films that Carpenter's film is barely a remake of the earlier film, it's actually rather another adaptation of the 1938 novella Who Goes There by John W Campbell and more truer to the source than the earlier film was since that was a very loose adaptation.
The list of extras
are astounding, I want this so badly.
I don't know, I think the original film was very much part of the impetus for Carpenter making his film and he even included it in Halloween with the kids watching it on TV.
In the Batman comparison its not like Nolan grew up watching Burton's film or even the 60s series and thought "I need to make this."
Also there's just a matter of this:
![]()
![]()
Not to mention Carpenter and Russell wanted to remake TWO Hawks films. A remake of Only Angels Have Wings was supposed to be Carpenter’s next film after The Thing, but The Thing’s box office ended that.