The "we're sorry, Brett" thread...

[XCharlieX]

There's nothing more ignorant than the "my opinion is better than yours because I know more about quality than you do" elitist snob,

Here we go again with the "everythign goes" attitude... do we know what happens when "everything goes"? ANYTHING... its the gate to chaos and weirdos legitimately staring you straight in the face and swearing on a stack of bibles that "Dude wheres my Car" deserves an oscar and expecting to be taken seriously...

LOL

 

[The Dark Defender]

well at this game , the critics prove you wrong.

people stop trying to pass your opinion for an universal truth.

it ain't.

No, it ain't, and critics ain't either.

They don't prove ****.

 

[Maze]

Again, dead wrong, but the same applies here as does to my last reply to ShadowBoxing.

Dead wrong? okk

I'm awaiting your proof . Let's argue.

 

[The Dark Defender]

Here we go again with the "everythign goes" attitude... do we know what happens when "everything goes"? ANYTHING... its the gate to chaos and weirdos legitimately staring you straight in the face and swearing on a stack of bibles that "Dude wheres my Car" deserves an oscar and expecting to be taken seriously...

LOL

Someone that can give an in depth analysis to explain clealry why they feel as they do, sure, something I'm yet to see you do once by the way.

 

[Tony Stark]

I thought X3 was a better X-Men movie then X1 and X2. I thought X2 was a better movie focused basically on Wolverine.

X1 doesn't even come close to X2 or X3. I'm sorry but anyone who says the characters in that weren't one dimensional are just....well everyone's entitled to their opinion, but I have to say you'd be flat out wrong.

Wolverine, in X1 one of the main characters, was little more then a tough guy act, and Storm, Cyclops, hell basically everyone aside from Rouge or Magneto were one dimensional characters and many of the main characters were never used. Sure X3 had characters like that, but the impressive thing to me was that they had double the amount of characters as the first two movies, and still only had a few characters that were very one dimensional.

X1 and X2 had five or six main characters tops, they had no excuse to have any of their characters be one dimensional, yet they still did, Because they focused mostly on Wolverine. Which I didn't mind since he's my favorite character, but don't act like X1 and X2 didn't misuse characters too.

They had double the amount of characters and did nothing with them. Even the main characters in this movie did nothing.

This movie just plain sucked.

 

[Maze]

No, it ain't, and critics ain't either.

They don't prove ****.

But what does it change to your opinion?

you like what you like? Yes or no?

i said taste should be respected

 

[The Dark Defender]

Dead wrong? okk

I'm awaiting your proof . Let's argue.

I'm waiting for yours too, and will be for a long time, since you're stating something you can't prove.

 

[XCharlieX]

Someone that can give an in depth analysis to explain clealry why they feel as they do, sure, something I'm yet to see you do once by the way.

I analyze fine thank you.

Its not hard to understand why people are up in arms about runtime. I think folks who are observant would notice such patterns.

at a certain point, one doesnt need to explain 5000 times the same old stuff. Figure it out yourself As far as im concerned its a thousand percent true... and i have not gone wrong because everyone else is saying the same thing now.

 

[Maze]

I'm waiting for yours too, and will be for a long time, since you're stating something you can't prove.

I advanced a fact : people study art form like in any field.and that's how their perception become more insightful ..

you think that your emotions rule? I SAY yes

you think that X3 rule?

i say YES.

but we're talking about your opinon and there is (again) nothing wrong with that.

 

[TheVileOne]

Its hilarious someone is actually saying that BRYAN SINGER is a hack and Brett Ratner FIXED the movies.

 

[The Dark Defender]

I analyze fine thank you.

Its not hard to understand why people are up in arms about runtime... i think folks who are observant would notice such patterns...

at a certain point, one doesnt need to explain 5000 times the same old stuff.. figure it out yourself

I agree that a longer length could've helped the film, I never said that I didn't; and making asinine posts toward people that you don't agree with isn't analyzing, thank you.

 

[The Dark Defender]

Its hilarious someone is actually saying that BRYAN SINGER is a hack and Brett Ratner FIXED the movies.

It's far more amazing someone can actually say BRYAN SINGER made good X-Men movies and Brett Ratner RUINED one.

 

[The Dark Defender]

I advanced a fact : people study art form like in any field.and that's how their perception become more insightful ..

you think that your emotions rule? I SAY yes

you think that X3 rule?

i say YES.

but we're talking about your opinon and there is (again) nothing wrong with that.

I advanced a fact, someone can get just as much of an idea of what makes a certain film better in certain areas than others without being a film critic, to say their opinions are on a higher platform from film buffs is far from fact.

 

[Maze]

It's far more amazing someone can actually say BRYAN SINGER made good X-Men movies and Brett Ratner RUINED one.

i would rather say Fox did.

and looking at if factually , that one like the movie or not they are way more responsible on this one.

 

[The Dark Defender]

at a certain point, one doesnt need to explain 5000 times the same old stuff. Figure it out yourself As far as im concerned its a thousand percent true... and i have not gone wrong because everyone else is saying the same thing now.

And what everyone else is saying is irrelevant to quality. Popularity and quality are two entirely different issues, if you knew how to competently analzye, you would be aware of that, since those that do don't need to rely on others.

 

[XCharlieX]

Anyway, this flick has issues obviously from the reviews... i think the ones that dont feel so are using the "good for an action movie" standard.

 

[Maze]

I advanced a fact, someone can get just as much of an idea of what makes a certain film better in certain areas than others without being a film critic, to say their opinions are on a higher platform from film buffs is far from fact.

yes , someone who really study in his own way with objectity , with analyze a movie .who doesn't stop to what he doesn't like at first ..who understand what goes in an image ( or not ) someone who doesn't go only with his primary emotions.

but , i see that you don't wan't to make any sense , so i will give you the last word , and say that you are right

 

[Tony Stark]

It's far more amazing someone can actually say BRYAN SINGER made good X-Men movies and Brett Ratner RUINED one.

I don't know if Rattner ruined the movie, but the movie sucked anyway you want to look at it.

 

[The Dark Defender]

yes , someone who study in his own way.

but , i see that you don't wan't to make any sense , so i will give you the last word , and say that you are right

And I seen that you didn't from the time you started claiming critics opinions are more accurate, it's fitting to call yourself Maze by the way, since you love arguing the same inaccurate point in circles.

 

[The Dark Defender]

I don't know if Rattner ruined the movie, but the movie sucked anyway you want to look at it.

It sucked the way you look at it, Singer's films did the same for me.

 

[Mr. Socko]

Either way, Storm was a useless stiff plank of wood in Singer's films.

 

[XCharlieX]

Well, i hope everyone knows this is how franchises slip... the fanbase divides and gets lenient, therefore theres confusion as to what to do with the next ones... and approval+quality gets lower and lower, all the while some folks defend it -_-

 

[Maze]

And I seen that you didn't from the time you started claiming critics opinions are more accurate, it's fitting to call yourself Maze by the way, since you love arguing the same inaccurate point in circles.

Well you know it's difficult to argue with somebody who doesn't seem to know what he is talking about and worse who is not humble about it.

but i will leave it at that..you're right.

 

[Infinity9999x]

They had double the amount of characters and did nothing with them. Even the main characters in this movie did nothing.

This movie just plain sucked.

They had doubble the amount of characters and the main characters did as much as they did in the first two, some even more then they did in the first two. You're telling me that cyclops, storm, jean that they had a big hand in the last two movies? They barley did anything, like I said, it was focused on Wolverine.

And I didn't mean to sound like my opinion is the way, I simply meant that in my opinion, you'd be wrong if you said the characters were better used in the first two films.

Basically what I've seen though, is there are two extremes here,you'll either love the movie or hate it. Now I don't know about rotten tomatoes, but Yahoo users gave the movie a B+, the critics a B-. So obviously not all the critics hate this movie.

 

[TheVileOne]

It's far more amazing someone can actually say BRYAN SINGER made good X-Men movies and Brett Ratner RUINED one.

I guess you are just one of those people that gets their rocks off from action scenes with no emotional impact or depth.

And don't care how clearly rushed this movie was.