Catman
Avenger
- Joined
- Jul 14, 2002
- Messages
- 29,046
- Reaction score
- 1
- Points
- 31
Man, I loved Reptilicus as a kid! And I couldn't remember his name, just that green stuff he vomits!
Agreed.Where's Cloverfield??
I wish I could slap you and whoever else liked cloverfield.Agreed.
I like Godzilla, but Cloverfield is better (and the best).
What in the heck did you not like in Cloverfield?I wish I could slap you and whoever else liked cloverfield.
It was would be a much shorter list if we did what I liked about it.What in the heck did you not like in Cloverfield?
What in the heck did you not like in Cloverfield?
Special effects were great, especially considering that the camera ran in one long shot from time-to-time with many different things and effects going on (I don't think that's been done before in the movies), the monster looked cool, even in the scenes that you could barley see the monster, it was cool what you did see, the action kept moving, original idea for a big disaster movie with the moving camera, the list goes on and on.It was would be a much shorter list if we did what I liked about it.
The camera work was original for this type of movie, and created realism, characters were just regular every day people, not trying to 'overact' to the point of 'they would never act like this if it was real,' the dialog made sense for this type of situation (and all that screaming, yeah, I'm sure you would hear alot of that if a thing like this really happened), the story was simple yet neat for this type of movie, trying to rescue and survive a monster attack, if anything, I found the movie to be too short (though, I think it actually was a perfect time, not too long, not too short)............the terrible, nauseating camera work, the unlikeable *****ebag characters, the laughable dialog, the non-existent story, the 60-something minute runtime... should i go on?
the only good think was the monster... that we got to see for a grand total of about 52 seconds, and even then, not very clearly.
that's why "Clover" isn't on that list. because a few weeks after the movie is out, no one knows what it even looks like, where it's from, what it's story is, etc.
The camera work was original for this type of movie, and created realism, characters were just regular every day people, not trying to 'overact' to the point of 'they would never act like this if it was real,' the dialog made sense for this type of situation (and all that screaming, yeah, I'm sure you would hear alot of that if a thing like this really happened), the story was simple yet neat for this type of movie, trying to rescue and survive a monster attack, if anything, I found the movie to be too short (though, I think it actually was a perfect time, not too long, not too short)............
And the creature was very visible at one time and in fact, also at other times in the city, I'd say at least twice......
Cloverfield will be etched in eternal stone because it's a............
.............Great movie.
But that's just it. This movie is GOOD!yeah, yeah, we get it... the movie was original and different. so is gwen stefani. that doesn't make her any good.
this movie is an internet fad. it won't be spoken of within the next few months.
yeah, yeah, we get it... the movie was original and different. so is gwen stefani. that doesn't make her any good.
this movie is an internet fad. it won't be spoken of within the next few months.
Agreed.
I like Godzilla, but Cloverfield is better (and the best).
the terrible, nauseating camera work, the unlikeable *****ebag characters, the laughable dialog, the non-existent story, the 60-something minute runtime... should i go on?
Dialog isn't a misspelling.