Under The Skin-Scarlett Johansson

[James.B]

From Writer-Director Jonathan Glazer who made Sexy Beast and Birth.
Scarlett Johansson plays an alien on earth, disguised as the perfect aesthetic form of a mesmerizing woman. She scours remote highways and desolate scenery looking to use her greatest weapon to snare human prey -- her voracious sexuality. She is deadly efficient, but over time becomes drawn to and changed by the complexity of life on earth. With this new found humanity and weakening alien resolve, she finds herself on a collision course with her own kind. Taking her point of view throughout, the film presents a unique look at our world through alien eyes.

EDIT: I don't think I can post the teaser trailer on here

 

[Teelie]

So it's kind of like V only with Scarlett. Not necessarily a bad thing.

 

[slumcat]

Alert: Scarlett has many nude scenes in this, full frontal nudity!

 

[Wesley Dodds]

It looks incredibly The Man Who Fell to Earth-y, plus Sexy Beast was great.

I'm intrigued...

 

[DarthSkywalker]

Alert: Scarlett has many nude scenes in this, full frontal nudity!

You better not be lying.

 

[slumcat]

You better not be lying.

Its premiered at festivals and they mention the full frontal nude scenes in the reviews. And they mention SEVERAL.

 

[DarthSkywalker]

Its premiered at festivals and they mention the full frontal nude scenes in the reviews. And they mention SEVERAL.

Well it may have taken a few too many years, but this sounds like a real piece of art. t:

 

[slumcat]

They just need to get the word out for those and they might have the year's biggest blockbuster on their hands.

 

[Loki882]

I really like Scarlett and I am intrigued to see her as a villain. In fact, I wish that she'd play more villain roles.

 

[dark_b]

she was born to be in a movie like this. the way she talks,the way she acts and the way she looks.i think she is not good enough for Avengers and for other movies. but this is perfect for her.

nudity is a bonus. but we dont need it.

 

[Gold Samurai]

Sounds kind of cheap. Like a movie you'd see on Cinemax.

 

[Shikamaru]

too bad she got rid of her big boobs tho

[YT]Tdk262sZ4oc[/YT]

 

[slumcat]

Is she mad??? Why would she do that. Look at those puppies in the before pic, I had names for them!

 

[dark_b]

ok i googled 2013 pics. and holly s....

this is an insane big change. and she got a new nose. avengers was filmed in 2011 and CA 2 in 2013. the change is obvious. i guess she had a small nose job from 2000 to 2005 and now a second. it was smart because its now easier to deny.

 

[DarthSkywalker]

I have heard the breast reduction rumors. When exactly was it suppose to have happened? It seem so strange considering.

 

[Asgard]

Damn...maybe they were too heavy for her frame. Causing back problems and the like.

 

[jmc]

She had a boob reduction?

Male desires aside she's not a very tall girl so it wouldn't surprise me. I knew a girl who was tiny and had massive breasts that were causing her nothing but back problems until she got them deflated.

But still......... damn.

 

[Loki882]

From what I've seen of Scarlett, she's never really wanted to be a sex symbol and actually is rather uncomfortable with it. The reduction surgery may have something to do with that. Also, she still looks gorgeous, she doesn't need massive breasts, so I'm fine with her choice. Plus, it will make it easier to do action scenes in future Marvel films.

 

[Dave McFly]

I remember reading about this movie a few years ago that's when they started filming it as they had set pics of her in character from it. it looks interesting and I am looking forward to it.

 

[mclay18]

So this is the art-house answer to Species?

 

[Kane52630]

Its premiered at festivals and they mention the full frontal nude scenes in the reviews. And they mention SEVERAL.

I feel like Priest Nicolas Cage from Face/Off right about now.

 

[Dave McFly]

I feel like Priest Nicolas Cage from Face/Off right about now.

 

[Laderlappen]

I saw the teaser and it looks amazing.

 

[Vid Electricz]

Sounds kind of cheap. Like a movie you'd see on Cinemax.

Very much so.

So this is the art-house answer to Species?

"Art"

 

[Loki882]

Very much so.



"Art"

Art is subjective, plus we should actually see the movie before judging it's quality.