Underwater Japanese Pyramid?

[SIZE=+2]Update [/SIZE]
[SIZE=+2]On Deep Water Megalithic Stones
and Structures Near Western Cuba[/SIZE]

http://www.altarcheologie.nl/index1.html?underwater_ruins/cuba/Earthfiles_com.htm

Northeast of Cabo San Antonio and down about one-half mile off the western
tip of Cuba are large stones in rectangular and pyramidal shapes. There are also huge unidentified structures that have 90 degree corners and are spread along straight corridors on the white sea floor sand.

CubaSideScanSonars.jpg

Original high resolution side scan sonar images of large structures a half mile down on the white sand sea floor off the western tip of Cuba, received by an ADC International, Inc.

CubaBestPyramid8.jpg

Pyramid shape seems "carved out of" massive rectangular stone
that can be seen behind the pyramid glowing in the glare of the ROV's light
(Remote Operated Video).

CubaRockTriangle9.jpg


Another mystery - what is the triangular object that in the video seems
to be resting independently on the large, curved megalithic stone?
This is also very very strange.....
 
So how is this gonna change how look at ancient civilizations? They built big ****. That's what I know them for already.
 
I don't think the scientific community is ready to accept an archeological discovery like this.

Give them time as more research is done. There is already evidence that many ancient sea ports and coasts have changed over thousands of years. There's even evidence of an ancient port now submerged in India. That Japanese site is in the Ring of Fire. So anything is possible.
 
Last edited:
So how is this gonna change how look at ancient civilizations? They built big ****. That's what I know them for already.

We're always learning something new about the past. What I find more disturbing over the past two centuries is a reluctance to accept things like this against traditional views. Dinosaur fanatics have a hard time reassessing the T-Rex as a scavenger, instead of a King of Predators. Recently there's evidence that dinosaurs might have had hair.
 
We're always learning something new about the past. What I find more disturbing over the past two centuries is a reluctance to accept things like this against traditional views. Dinosaur fanatics have a hard time reassessing the T-Rex as a scavenger, instead of a King of Predators. Recently there's evidence that dinosaurs might have had hair.


They believe the T Rex probably did both, but preferred scavenging, as the bone structure apparently allows for short term sprinting. o.o

However, it is sorta hard to push against established views, especially in mainstream science. Which is both good AND bad. Good, because it doesn't allow simply everything to label itself as serious, bad, because it definitely makes the process drag along.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"