Using the Mentally Disabled for Suicide Bombers

Agnostics don't have an agenda. That's practically written into the definition of, "agnostic." :huh:

It's a non-agenda. It's like the opposite of an agenda.

Does not compute.
I need to start choosing my words more precisely for you hyenas in here:cmad: But there are a few agnostics in here that go into Christian threads and question followers through crude anologies and sarcasm.
 
I need to start choosing my words more precisely for you hyenas in here:cmad: But there are a few agnostics in here that go into Christian threads and question followers through crude anologies and sarcasm.
Hyenas are more closely related to cats than to dogs. Fun fact for the day. :up:
 
I need to start choosing my words more precisely for you hyenas in here:cmad: But there are a few agnostics in here that go into Christian threads and question followers through crude anologies and sarcasm.


Chaseter, I think your meaning Atheists not Agnostics. Atheists are usually the ones to jump on the religious(especially Christians/Catholics) in an arrogant manner talking down to them as if their 100% right too.

It's funny how a lot of them can throw their beliefs around just as bad as the religious.
 
Chaseter, I think your meaning Atheists not Agnostics. Atheists are usually the ones to jump on the religious(especially Christians/Catholics) in an arrogant manner talking down to them as if their 100% right too.

It's funny how a lot of them can throw their beliefs around just as bad as the religious.
More hyenas:woot: :cmad: Read up a few posts. I know agnostics are neutral, but they can still hold preconceived notions or have certain attitudes about any religion.
 
So, this is kind of the opposite of a "smart-bomb" :o
 
Chaseter, I think your meaning Atheists not Agnostics. Atheists are usually the ones to jump on the religious(especially Christians/Catholics) in an arrogant manner talking down to them as if their 100% right too.

It's funny how a lot of them can throw their beliefs around just as bad as the religious.

I think its less a matter of whether the person is Atheist or Agnostic or whatever, and more a personality trait. There's nothing inherent in being Atheist or Agnostic that breeds a personal need to attack Christianity.
 
I think its less a matter of whether the person is Atheist or Agnostic or whatever, and more a personality trait. There's nothing inherent in being Atheist or Agnostic that breeds a personal need to attack Christianity.
Women, always can say the stuff a man can't get out of his mouth:csad: You are correct. If atheism had a set of beliefs against beliefs then it would be a pseudo religion I guess:huh:
 
Whilst sickening, it is a better strategy for the terrorists and an inevitable progression for the terror war. I was always confused as to why they don't just roll a truck on a motorway or knock on random people's doors and execute them to breed an environment of fear.

In a nutshell, human nature itself is pretty sickening, and unfortuantely can't be helped :(

Looks like they're running out of ppl who want to blow themselves up. I don't think this has anything to do with strategy. I think someone clued them in to the fact that the 72 virgins they'll be having sex with in heaven are actually a bunch of star wars nerds.
 
Again, proving no thread here about inhumane acts can't be discussed without a uneccessary joke. Thanks guys:o
 
Ultimately what it comes down to and why posters seem so disgusted over this particular topic .... is that no one wants to admit they got blown up by a f'n ******. It would be a humiliating defeat.
 
Ultimately what it comes down to and why posters seem so disgusted over this particular topic .... is that no one wants to admit they got blown up by a f'n ******. It would be a humiliating defeat.

Ya know, I'm agnostic, but I'm so going to hell for laughing at this.
 
Achievement.aspx
 
Tactically, this is a brilliant idea. You dont waste one of your true believers, and you still get the job done. I'm honestly surprised they havent trained animals at this point as well. Train a dog to simply walk into a crowded area, or hell, just let it loose there, with a bomb in it's stomach, and detonate it from a safe distance.
 
Tactically, this is a brilliant idea. You dont waste one of your true believers, and you still get the job done. I'm honestly surprised they havent trained animals at this point as well. Train a dog to simply walk into a crowded area, or hell, just let it loose there, with a bomb in it's stomach, and detonate it from a safe distance.

About 4 years ago, a donkey was loaded with explosives and blowed up in Bethlehem, about the same time Israel made advances in the Gaza Strip.

And then the president of PETA wrote a letter to Arafat asking him to please leave the animals out of their conflict :dry:
 
About 4 years ago, a donkey was loaded with explosives and blowed up in Bethlehem, about the same time Israel made advances in the Gaza Strip.

And then the president of PETA wrote a letter to Arafat asking him to please leave the animals out of their conflict :dry:

PETA are idiots, and when it comes right down to it, terrible people if the only thing that gets them interested in mass murder is "omg, they killed teh donkyzorz!"
 
I'm not trying to start a huge debate here, I just want to see more of your opinion. Really, what religion that has been adopted has no reward or punishment system for its followers. Because in reality, what makes someone follow a religion if no reward/punishment exists? Human nature (altruism) exemplifies that. Are they going to force it upon you? Sure, but no true martyrs are forced or tricked into it(which is sadly what this thread title addresses and is sickening). But once again, as I have said...it is man that is behind the attrocities, not the religion itself.

well, I don't see what the traits of religion have to do with an aspect of it.
I pointed out that it wasn't Just because of the 72 virgins, you have pretty much admitted it's not, so really, there's no debate.
I'm not arguing religion as a system, I'm not arguing the particulars of religion, just the fact that suicide bombers commit the acts they do not only based upon the reward, some do, but the fact is that it's really complex.
I mean, you know my opinion on this.
you tried, perhaps as a joke, to oversimplify a matter, then pretty much admitted to oversimplifying but added a "my point stands" feel to your response.
which is weird, ignoring the political, ideological, economical factors and boiling it down to "horny teenagers and lonely old men" was laughable.

You didn't call it evil. It makes me laugh in all the Christian threads how some people try to make followers second guess their life by addressing the written flaws of man. Like how nearly everyone, including myself, harp on how annoying it is for followers to try and push their agenda when atheists and agnostics do the same:o

and why does it make you laugh? why is it funny that someone tells you to question what you believe in?
let's be honest here, someone had to tell you to believe in it in the first place didn't they? and, let's be clear here "the written flaws of man"?
then, gee, the holy text, the perfect word of god means NOTHING if it's flawed, hey, let's throw away the bible and do away with all this hypocrisy, if it's just about the "written flaws of man".
final note, what's the agnostic/atheist agenda?
seriously, "question stuff?" that's the agenda? seems like a basic idea that's responsible for most advances in humanity's history.
so, what would the agenda be anyway?
 
Despite the complete absence of morals, it's a good tactic in terms of using what you have.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,265
Messages
22,075,372
Members
45,874
Latest member
kedenlewis
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"