I can't think of a single statement ever spoken by a politician that is dumber than what this guy said.
He just said out loud what the Bush Adminstration has probably been plan..I mean wishing for behind closed doors.
I can't think of a single statement ever spoken by a politician that is dumber than what this guy said.
Lulled who?
You.
nothing has happened?
uh....haven't thousands of people died overseas?
haven't hundreds of people had their rights trampled?
No. not in America. That is what I was referring to. But I'm sure you knew that. You just wanted to take a shot.
... I.....I mean, what world do you live in?
terrorist plots were being foiled BEFORE 9-11 in case you have conveniently forgot about the Millenium terror attacks ( all foiled by the way) well. maybe you forgot, you know why?
because the Clinton admin/ fought the war on Terror IN SILENCE. as it should be run.
Mr. Sparkle ,dude, grow a brain.
Mr Sparkle said:Lulled who?You.
LOL, no, unlike you I'm wide awake and can see clearly who my enemies are, what threatens freedom and what doesn't and who wants what.
I like the fact that you can't understand that no-one is "lulled" because everyone in the US lives in fear now, perhaps you haven't taken a plane in the last 6 years or so.
ahaha your blindness is comical.
Mr Sparkle said:nothing has happened?
uh....haven't thousands of people died overseas?
haven't hundreds of people had their rights trampled?
... I.....I mean, what world do you live in?
No. not in America. That is what I was referring to. But I'm sure you knew that. You just wanted to take a shot.
uh.....remind me, wasn't the first major attack by Bin Laden ( the one with the 2,900 + dead) on Bush's watch? maybe he was the one "lulled"into a false sense of security.
maybe that's why he cut antiterrorism funding in his first 8 months to favor a missile defense shield ( which I'm sure some arms contractor found quite profitable) and afterwards myabe that's why he forgot about Bin Laden ( the lulling thing remember?)
what exactly should people be thanking him for?
Mr Sparkle said:terrorist plots were being foiled BEFORE 9-11 in case you have conveniently forgot about the Millenium terror attacks ( all foiled by the way) well. maybe you forgot, you know why?
because the Clinton admin/ fought the war on Terror IN SILENCE. as it should be run.
jesus ,dude, grow a brain.
You obviously don't live on this planet.
the only thing "obvious" here is the fact that you had no answer to my point ( which was devastating if I do say so myself) so you had little else to do but to have some weak sauce one liner not even remotely related to my response.
gee Celldog, that's quite telling, it seems you yourself know the fragility of your stance.
well, you might yet see the light.
I can't think of a single statement ever spoken by a politician that is dumber than what this guy said.
we haven't had any foreign terrorist attacks since 9/11 and before that it was the bombing of the WTC in 93 (not nearly as horrible as 9/11).
we were doing just fine w/out Bush...
LOL...I'll admit that's funny.
But that guy used a poor choice of words. I think I understood the jist. Basically Bush has become a victim of his own success in this area. The fact that nothing has happen in 5 to 6 years has lulled many of you back to sleep. Heck, it's got that "empty-suit", John Edwards actually saying there is no war on terror!!
He says this while a ..."coff" (clearing throat) terror plot is foiled at JFK Airport!!!![]()
If we get attacked, it'd be all Bush's fault.
But since we haven't gotten attacked since 9/11, Bush gets none of the credit.
Just a little insight into the 'liberal' mind.
Carry on.
what about all the attacks we weren't having before Bush was President?
Should Carter get credit because there was no terrorist attacks in America during his reign? Of course not, that would be silly. That doesn't prove anything, Bush has empowered Al-Qaeda and they are likely just looking for the perfect time to strike. Give me evidence that Bush has weakened Al-Qaeda, then I will be impressed.
You mean like the attack on the WTC that happened during Clinton's term, or the attack on the USS Cole? Do you forget that 9/11 was planned during Clinton's term?
Oh, my bad, Clinton's a liberal - he can do no wrong.
That's a pretty dumb*** analogy. Terrorist attacks during or before Carter's term weren't even on the radar. There were no anti-terrorist organizations or efforts made to prevent terrorist attacks in the US because none had happened previously to set a precedent.
Again, completely dumb*** analogy, but way to oversimplify things to an extreme that requires absolutely no brain power.
You mean like the attack on the WTC that happened during Clinton's term, or the attack on the USS Cole? Do you forget that 9/11 was planned during Clinton's term?
Oh, my bad, Clinton's a liberal - he can do no wrong.
Wasn't Bush Sr. in office when the original bombing in 93 happened?