What the hell are you talking about. Look for information then post. Welfare HAS BEEN an issue in the Senate since 1996, a HUGE ISSUE. Hence why Clinton ran on the "end Welfare as we know it" slogan, and why he passed this
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personal_Responsibility_and_Work_Opportunity_Act. However like most policies it is not perfect nor will welfare ever be perfect, however we have nearly cut Welfare expendatures in half since Reagan and dropped significantly since 94. In the state of South Carolina alone Welfare costs went from 40 million annually to 24 million annually. Furthermore the workforce increased in that time, and several urban housing projects have been turned into partnerships with great success, like Eastwood. True there are some people who mooch of Welfare, however now the stipulation is you have to work. Whether you quit your job or not at the end of two years when your Welfare expires is still somewhat of a problem, although not as bad. So no the welfare is not in SERIOUS need of reform, nor can people just live off welfare anymore.
Furthermore the junk food issue has nothing to do with welfare and everything to do with the competitive food market. You honestly expect people to pay more for food that does not taste as good, has less flavor additives, no addictive properties and is more expensive just because he should be healthy. That is DHHS department, not Welfare.