kedrell
Fork&SpoonOperator
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2006
- Messages
- 21,379
- Reaction score
- 6
- Points
- 33
Well we know Moss and Bell are Vietnam veterens who are haunted by their experiences.
We know Moss is a Vietnam vet. I don't believe Bell ever talked about Vietnam at all. The haunting is supposition on your part. So basically that's falls under occupation I'd say.
As is Woody Harrellson's character and also maybe Chigurgh.
More supposition.
Those two have a history together, probably in the Special Forces, considering their employment now and Chigurgh's skills.
All we know is that they know each other. The rest is supposition yet again.
We know that Sheriff Bell is jaded and feels like he is outgunned in this "new" world.
Fair enough. This literally is his entire character which IMO makes him a walking sign that says "things ain't what they used to be" and nothing more.
We know that Moss is a decent enough man to wake up in the middle of the night to go and bring water to that shot drug dealer water even though he knows it's not a good idea.
That's about all there is TO know about him internally.
We learn a lot of things about these characters. It's just not spelt out for us explicitly. I find it strange you complain about this considering i've seen you bemoan other films for "spoon feeding" and not being subtle enough.
Movies like this and 2001: A Space Odyssey are the other end of that spectrum. They are obscurant and basically throwing crap on screen and saying to the audience "ok, YOU interpret this". I hate that. It isn't my job to help write the film for them by filling in the immense blanks they've left in the script. It's not clever, it's lazy BS IMO.
And i'm not even touching on the more existential themes such as fate, chance, cause/effect and death.
All of which you have to plug into the movie on your own to get something out of it. You clearly don't mind doing so and that's fine. I do mind it when I spend my own money to see something that they were paid to write.
It's totally ok to not like a film like No Country. I can get why it's not every bodies cup of tea. But don't try and say it's a poorly made film. Because it isn't. And don't try to generalise by saying those who like it are pretentious Coen brown nosers. I love No Country for Old Men. I also love Borat. I also love Anchorman. I also ****ing love Harold and Kumar get the Munchies. Try to wrap your head round that.
Are you a professional, paid film critic? If not then what I said above doesn't apply to you so enjoy whatever you want.