Jordacar
The Endless One
- Joined
- Jan 18, 2007
- Messages
- 6,126
- Reaction score
- 447
- Points
- 73
The first Alien, directed by Ridley Scott, was a landmark of horror and sci-fi filmmaking. James Cameron's follow-up Aliens, became a textbook model of a pitch-perfect sequel. After that, things got dodgy.
Alien 3 hit all kinds of disasters before the cameras even rolled. Cracked.com's David Wong says:
http://www.cracked.com/article_15631_10-best-sci-fi-films-never-made.html
And over on dvdactive.com, the Alien franchise was first on Marcus' list of 10 Franchises That Deserve Better
http://www.dvdactive.com/editorial/articles/the-ten-franchises-that-deserve-better.html
So I've been thinking, given the above analysis and what we know now, if you could start with Alien Part 3, how would you want to handle the story and the franchise differently to properly fulfill your dreams of geek-sci-fi-horror greatness?
Alien 3 hit all kinds of disasters before the cameras even rolled. Cracked.com's David Wong says:
http://www.cracked.com/article_15631_10-best-sci-fi-films-never-made.html
#10. The "Real" Alien 3
The most excited I've ever been about a movie was the moment I saw the first Alien 3 "teaser" trailer in 1991 (Teasers are shot well before the movie itself is finished filming.). It's the one that promised the aliens were coming to freaking Earth.
No, I didn't dream it. They really did show that trailer (they even have a copy of it HERE), having sent it to theaters before they had even started production on the movie.
Visions of awesomeness flashed through my head, a Blade Runner-ish Earth with sprawling, filthy buildings, huge, flashing billboards with giant Asian women on them, eat-up flying cars whooshing by and steam always rising from the streets for some reason. Then, the aliens start breeding in the sewers until the creatures come boiling up out of manholes by the hundreds, to be cut to pieces by Marines with pulse rifles and maybe in the climax, the Army has to nuke the city ...
"This movie can't possibly not be awesome!" I said to my little friend John at the time. "This is gonna make Aliens look like ET! I hope it's directed by the guy who will in the future direct Fight Club!"
A year and 30 ****ing screenplays later (including this rejected script by William Gibson), they came up with the movie that killed the franchise, then squatted over the face of the corpse and farted.
They had stumbled through concept after concept, built sets, torn them down, filmed scenes, thrown them away, fired directors and fired crew. When Sigourney Weaver held out for more money, they wrote scripts without her, when she came back, they did rewrites to cram her back into the story. Very late in the game, they brought in a young director named David Fincher--whose only experience was with Madonna videos--to start shooting after most of the budget had already been scattered to the wind like parade confetti.
What squeezed out the other end of the development's digestive tract was a movie that, just seconds in, meaninglessly kills off the three characters Ripley spent the last film saving. The hundreds of aliens were replaced with one small alien dog.
The vast, futuristic landscape was replaced by one dim, dirty building. The frantic gunfights were replaced by scenes of identical, bald cast members staring quietly at the wall. The main character commits suicide at the end.
So what happened?
Budget, mostly. My Alien 3 would have cost twice what Aliens did, with its sprawling sets and swarms of animatronic creatures (remember CGI effects were new and still very expensive in 1991). At the end of all that I'd have an R-rated sci-fi film with almost no chance of making back its budget (Aliens only made about $85 million, $150 million if you adjust for inflation).
So, they settled for this stripped-down version on a budget of $50 million, filmed in an abandoned lead factory. Then, they watched as fanboys like me piled into the theater on opening day anyway.
This is why they're rich film executives, and I live in my car.
And over on dvdactive.com, the Alien franchise was first on Marcus' list of 10 Franchises That Deserve Better
http://www.dvdactive.com/editorial/articles/the-ten-franchises-that-deserve-better.html
So the Alien franchise is still an active development, even though it is largely a shadow if it's 30-year-old self.
So I've been thinking, given the above analysis and what we know now, if you could start with Alien Part 3, how would you want to handle the story and the franchise differently to properly fulfill your dreams of geek-sci-fi-horror greatness?
