Deaths Head II
The Sequel
- Joined
- May 16, 2007
- Messages
- 5,115
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
I never saw Alien 3. I don't know if I should.
Although I read this a few days ago I'm deciding to comment on that article and call horse **** on that guy. All because of this quote. Also, someone correct me if I read it wrong but to me it sounds obvious...yet full of BS.
"This movie can't possibly not be awesome!" I said to my little friend John at the time. "This is gonna make Aliens look like ET! I hope it's directed by the guy who will in the future direct Fight Club!"
Aliens 3 came out in 1992, Fight Club came out in 1999. No way in hell back before '92 when Alien 3 was still being talked about/set up did anyone have any clue David Fincher would end up directing Fight Club nearly 7-8 years later. What is this guy talking about?!?
People can say what they want but the Alien saga is one of the few good quadrilogies.
IMO Alien 3 or 4 didn't ruined the series as some of you claim, it may have ruined it for you but that is another story.
Each Alien movie has a tone and atmosphere of its own and that make the saga pretty unique in my eyes.
What tainted the saga ( and Predator too ) is the AvP movies.
I thought AVP was one of the worst movies I had ever seen.
It felt like one of those fan youtube movies extended to a movie. It would have worked better as short.
....I'm pretty sure he was trying write a witty article. That part was a joke. And I pretty much can't take the article seriously, it's so stupid.
There are usually two camps in this debate. Everyone agrees Alien and Aliens are terrific. But people split when it comes to which sequel ruined the franchise, Alien 3 or Alien 4.
I'm of the camp that likes Alien 3. I remember seeing it in the theater and initially not liking it. After the ultimate high of a kick-ass ending that Aliens left, it seemed like a whiplash inducing curveball. It went back to the horror aspect of the first film. And Fincher did what he does best...shock you. That's what we love about Fincher, whether it is a head in a box or a dual personality...he is always willing to smack the audience upside the head. And they went in with the intention that this was the last Alien film. They also established the idea that the Alien takes on the characteristics of the host.
Is it as good as the previous two entries?..no, but it is still a dark, intense movie. It still feels like an Alien film. It took a few years, but I grew to really like that film and what it tried to add to the series. It would have been a great way to just end the series right there.
Resurrection on the other hand, with it's moments of silliness, feels like somebody made a parody of Aliens. It doesn't fit in the mood of the other films and feels so out of place to me. And what's bad is it had a good concept with the Ripley clone, but the execution was so piss-poor. It's on my list of movies I try to ignore the existence of or they ruin the rest of the franchise for me (I'm looking at you Terminator 3!)
Obvisouly, since there was a fourth film, Alien 3 didn't destroy the Alien franchise. Alien 4 did. The only way to attempt recovery was combine with Predator. And though I don't altogether hate those movies, we all know how that mixture didn't exactly yield a classic.
Can you really call it a franchise before there's been more than a single movie in it? Aliens made it a franchise. Alien 3 split the difference between horror and action and Resurrection meandered into pointless action and half-hearted horror with the clone angle.There's a good argument to be made that the sequel that "ruined" the franchise was Aliens. As terrific as it is, it turned a horror franchise into an action franchise, took out most of the mystery of the creatures and essentially reduced them to space bugs that blow up real good, and gave closure to Ripley. The creatures became much less interesting and there really wasn't anywhere to go with Ripley either who became Alpha Mom incarnate at the end.
Not to say that as a knock against Cameron. His duty was to deliver a complete movie, not to keep the franchise kicking for the next director, but it's very easy to see Aliens as a completion of a series.
AVP and AVP2 were just abominations to the Alien and Predator franchises.
PS : and if it is one of the worst movies you ever see I think you didn't see a lot of movies![]()
Can you really call it a franchise before there's been more than a single movie in it? Aliens made it a franchise. Alien 3 split the difference between horror and action and Resurrection meandered into pointless action and half-hearted horror with the clone angle.