Sam Fisher
Heavy Meddle
- Joined
- Sep 26, 2004
- Messages
- 14,743
- Reaction score
- 2
- Points
- 31
Well, they did the same thing with DVD when it first came along.
Well, they did the same thing with DVD when it first came along.
People use that argument and it never works. The industry was different back then, and consumers saw DVDs as a new hobby of sorts.
I'm not against Blu-Ray at all. But I think of it as a luxury for the time being. However, I'm going to invest into Blu-Ray, then give me the best transfer with all of the features left in tact since I'm paying more for it.
For example, I would love to buy Fight Club on Blu-ray, but don't give me a barebones edition. it seems like certain movies are getting that sort of treatment.
The thing is I would say that is hard for one to determine that does not have Blu-ray.
I at first did not care. But when I got my new Samsun 61 inch LED lit DLP 1080P that is when I changed my mind. The difference is incredible. Putting a DVD of TDK compared to the Blu-Ray itself shows the vast difference.
Even though they are not adding "tons" more yet. They are doing so. And to me the transfer's alone of like Blade Runner, are jaw dropping.
Yeah, with Warner Bros, they're doing a good job with their movies, like Blade Runner, and I love their digi-books too.
I saw a movie at Best Buy once, and I saw the difference between Iron Man on both formats and it's amazing.
However, the Iron Man on blu-ray was moving way too fast; less 24 frames per second and more like 30. Is that normal? Can you adjust it?
Already out.Titanic
Independence Day
War of the Worlds
Saving Private Ryan
lol me and you both buddyThe One ..still waiting for the extended version which can only be seen on FX lol