CrypticOne said:
Even though Harry is my favorite character, people don't like repetative villains, thats why Sandman is the main villain. They made a good choice in picking Sandman as the main baddie too. Venom is okay, and people are looking forward more to his character, but this movie is all about Sandman for me.
It's not about repetative villains...it's about telling a story.
Were people pissed off when Vader showed up in Empire Strikes Back? Damn! He was back again in Jedi!
Did anyone throw up their hands in protest when Sauron was still heading up all evil in Middle Earth in The Two Towers?
It's a story. You don't change a story just because - you TELL the damn thing. Frankly, in the beginning Raimi should have made a decision - Goblin Legacy or Venom Saga, picked one and made 3 movies BASED on that. Think of how deep routed these characters could have been. Think how much we'd actually care about Brock's reason for revenge and transformation...instead of scaling it down to a case of "Dur he took me girl. Me angry!"
Same goes for the Goblin Legacy - the first two movies worked well, as we saw Harry's continued plummet...now it seems Sam has decided to just make him a pain in Spidey's ass instead of adapting the issue where Harry died! Oh what a film that would have been! Would it have been the Green Goblin again? Yes. Could they tweaked the costume some and made it badass? Yes. Who the hell WOULDNT have loved to see Harry, in costume, stalking Spidey while Pete's out to dinner, or lunch, or WHATEVER.
Instead we're sacrificing story for sheer "The fans want Venom? Put Venom in! I like Sandman myself but he just a **** character so I'll have him kill Uncle Ben...put him in! Oh wait...yeah, that whole Legacy thing...uh...give Harry like..a spoon or a sword or something...eh..I dunno, a black suit. Buckles..uh...snowboard? I dont care!"