Why does everyone consider 'Fergie' ulgy?

The last Maxim pic is cute.

yes, indeed.

You do know that magazines use make-up on the chicks, and then they also touch up the photos on a computer

Yes, I'm aware that makeup and several touch ups are done in the computers before any photos get published. But they do it to models and celebrities all the time. just to hide several imperfections (and we all have them whether we admit it or not).

Lastly, I'm not arguing that she doesn't have the prettiest face in Hollywood. Honestly I find her face to be :dry: . But everything else (body, butt, ****, etc) appears to look great. Therefore, I would still tap it. The face doesn't bug me at all where I would need a paper bag. Plus, p**sy is p**sy, they all look the same in the dark. :woot:
 
fergie-2-gm_l1.jpg


fergie-2-gm_l3.jpg


fergie-2-gm_l2.jpg


So, that's ugly?? :csad:

I would still tap it over and over!

Maxim can make anyone look good, Fergie looks like an Ogre without make up.

Sandra Oh looks like one of those cloning aliens from Star Wars Episode 2.
sandra-kamino.jpg

Oh looks more like Gene Simmons. :woot:
 
Fergalicous, definition,make them boys go crazy. They always callin' on me, comin' to me, call me Stacy. I'm the F to the E,R,G the I, the E, and can't no other lady break it down like me. :o
 
We need a "women so weird looking they're hot" thread. :o

sandra_oh_02.jpg

devonaoki24ch.jpg

karen1280.jpg
 
Terry, you should make that thread.
 
Yeah, sure If you're inot transexuals I could see the attraction.
 
She's alright looking, but she should be executed on sight for the dumbing down of the American music scene. She is a talentless hack and I hope she goes away very soon.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,288
Messages
22,080,431
Members
45,880
Latest member
Heartbeat
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"