Worst Film to Kick Off a Cinematic Universe

Which was the worst attempt at kicking off a cinematic universe?

  • Godzilla (2014) - MonsterVerse

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • The Force Awakens - Star Wars

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Iron Man - Marvel Cinematic Universe

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • X-Men - Fox Mutant Universe

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • The Lego Movie - Lego Universe

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • The Conjuring - Conjuring/Annabelle/Nun series

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • The Amazing Spider-Man - Sony's Spider-Verse WITH Spider-Man

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • King Arthur: Legend of the Sword - Shared Camelot Universe

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Clerks - View Askewniverse

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • AVP - Aliens/Predator Universe

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Creed - Rocky/Creed Universe

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • U.S. Marshals - Tommy Lee Jones Chases People Universe

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    34
If it's including even false starts:

(1) Dracula Untold - god that film was atrocious lol.
(2) Robin Hood - granted I've just heard bad things and haven't seen it
(3) Mummy - at least it was entertaining, Untold put me to sleep
 
Imagine if Marvel Studios had started MCU with The Incredible Hulk.
 
I'm glad people still remember Dracula Untold was the false start to the Dark Universe.

(was the Radcliffe-professor X Frankenstein supposed to be a part of it too or I'm mis-remembering?)
Just like Green Lantern was a false start to DC Films universe.
 
What's Iron Man even doing in that list? That's like asking what is the worst comic book movie of all time and then listing Avengers Infinity War alongside the likes of Catwoman, Fant4stic, Elektra, Steel etc.
Iron Man could have turned out to be a mediocre movie, it had some re-shoots and they had the script writer write some dialogues and scenes right on location !

I will just quote a post from a SHH user to explain this.

Movies go through re-shoots all the time. Gonna have to be multiple sources on this set-trouble stuff to treat it seriously, not some randoms on a podcast. Put it into context, too: the first Ant-Man was a cluster**** in the early days of shooting. They turned that around and we got a really solid flick out of it.

The first Iron Man they didn't even have a complete script, they were basically improvising & winging a big chunk of the character moments.

If the directors aren't quite up to it, Edwards on Rogue One style, or if the directors aren't team players Edgar Wright style, Feige will step in and set them straight. And it's seriously doubtful we're even dealing with either of those two scenarios here.

Doubt there's anything to worry about with the script either - even though Gunn threw out Nicole Perlman's Guardians script and started over, Marvel must have liked her stuff in general to ask her back for a second time. There's some faith there. And Downey's put her in the writing room for the third Sherlock movie.
 
Last edited:
Also, add King Arthur Universe that WB wanted to launch by making "King Arthur: Legend of the Sword" as first movie in the series, because why not ? :o

King_Arthur_LotS_poster.jpg
 
And who is seriously gonna reasonably vote for Iron Man or the Conjuring as the worst film to kick off a cinematic universe?

Then there is no harm in them being included in the poll, right?
 
Iron Man could have turned out to be a mediocre movie, it had some re-shoots and they had the script writer write some dialogues and scenes right on location !

I will just quote a post from a SHH user to explain this.

But we're not talking in hypotheticals here. We're talking about what actually happened and how these films turned out and how successful they were ultimately in launching a cinematic universe.
 
But we're not talking in hypotheticals here. We're talking about what actually happened and how these films turned out and how successful they were ultimately in launching a cinematic universe.
Not saying that Iron Man is the movie which is a contender for a worst film to kick off a movie universe (IM is one of my fav. MCU films.) but I was just pointing out that things might have been a bit different given the problems it faced during shooting stages. And...
Then there is no harm in them being included in the poll, right?
 
Last edited:
On Robin Hood (2018)
1) It was great fun, and I loved it, and I chalk everyone else's problems with it up to expectations that it be some other movie. That's right, you're all wrong!
2) Also in addition to being facetiously wrong, you are actually wrong. Robin Hood (2018) is a standalone film made by Lionsgate and should not be confused with the Sony project in development, Hood, which is intended to start a Robin Hood extended universe. As such it has no place on this poll. Neither does any other Robin Hood movie in development, whether the Margot Robbie vehicle Marian, Disney's Nottingham & Hood, or Dreamworks' Merry Men, or while we're at it, Robin Hood 2058 or Robin Hood and the Prince of Aragorn. [AV Club Article]

On the topic: The Mummy is the answer. No one loved The Mummy. No one stans The Mummy, and no other franchise released a group shot of it's universe's high profile stars before it failed. It's not even close. Take of that clear winner and the runner up is a bit of a race, but I'd go with The Amazing Spider-Man. Totally forgettable, though admittedly I haven't and won't see The Conjuring.

From the Wikipedia page:

The project was first announced on February 26, 2015, when a third Robin Hood script was announced written by Joby Harold, which Leonardo DiCaprio's Appian Way would produce.[6] There were two scripts already in the works: one at Disney titled Nottingham & Hood and another at Sony titled Hood.[6] This script was expected to be taken by Sony to merge it with its other project.[6] Lionsgate acquired the distribution rights to the film on March 19, 2015. It was then titled Robin Hood: Origins.[7]


So while technically, you are correct, this film was at one point intended to be merged with Sony's "Hood" film, which was intended to kick off the Robin Hood Cinematic Universe. Hypothetically, had Robin Hood (2018) been released by Sony, they might have moved forward with their RHCU.

Also, I'm glad you are the one person on earth who enjoyed the movie.
 
Also, add King Arthur Universe that WB wanted to launch by making "King Arthur: Legend of the Sword" as first movie in the series, because why not ? :o

King_Arthur_LotS_poster.jpg

LOL, I think they just said they had six sequels planned, didn't they? Or were they planning spinoffs as well?

EDIT: Holy crap, they were planning a shared universe! Guess the poll needs updated, because that movie was garbage.
 
Are we all forgetting Ghostbusters 2016 and it's stupid "Ghost Corps" crap? That thing event had its own logo just like Dark Universe!
 
The Amazing Spider-Man was not a bad movie. The second one was the death knell.

Robin Hood and The Mummy were DOA, and Venom shouldn't exist without Spider-Man.
 
The Amazing Spider-Man had good moments, but overall I didn't like it. The bad moments outweighed the good. But I would agree that TASM2 was the true death of that universe.
 
The Amazing Spider-Man had good moments, but overall I didn't like it. The bad moments outweighed the good. But I would agree that TASM2 was the true death of that universe.

I liked Garfield and Stone but that's about all I can say for those films. The first one just felt kinda flat and the second one was like Batman Forever. That scene with the evil doctor guy dunking Electro in the tank was straight out of a Schumacher film.
 
I liked Garfield and Stone but that's about all I can say for those films. The first one just felt kinda flat and the second one was like Batman Forever. That scene with the evil doctor guy dunking Electro in the tank was straight out of a Schumacher film.

Yeah, whoever rewatched Batman Forever when they made TASM2 and said "We need the Riddler in our movie!!!!" should have been fired on the spot.
 
Oh, yeah, forgot about that one too.
Yeah, and it died on its feet because Paul Feig's a self-gender hating hack of a writer who crowbarred gross-out humor into a series that didn't need it and painted every character with a penis in that movie in a negative light in various degrees (seriously, why would you make Chris Hemsworth look like he's too stupid to live?) and all the women in the movie look like angels, whilst saying publicly all the people who thought the movie looked like crap "sexist towards women" with no basis when the opposite was true of his damn movie? ALL of which the original 2 Ghostbusters movies and their cartoon shows NEVER pulled! And Sony wanted to make a CU out of that? What a f-ing joke.
 
But again, where is the harm? It isn't going to win the poll, so who ultimately cares?
 
Its because someone already pointed out that Iron Man shouldn't be in the poll, then the poster edited the poll, adding another movie which doesn't really fits the criteria of being the worst cinematic universe kickstarter.... might as well make this is a ranking of cinematic universe kickstarters. There is no harm but why include films that don't fit the criteria of the question being asked and movies that wouldn't get any votes. Thats like putting poll choices for the sake of it only leading to people to question why certain films are being included in the poll when they shouldn't.
 
Its because someone already pointed out that Iron Man shouldn't be in the poll, then the poster edited the poll, adding another movie which doesn't really fits the criteria of being the worst cinematic universe kickstarter.... might as well make this is a ranking of cinematic universe kickstarters. There is no harm but why include films that don't fit the criteria of the question being asked and movies that wouldn't get any votes. Thats like putting poll choices for the sake of it only leading to people to question why certain films are being included in the poll when they shouldn't.

The poster was adding all options they could think of. There are people in the world who favor a movie like The Mummy over Iron Man. Is that number small? Yes, but they exist.

I don't see why you're getting bent out of shape about it. It's not going to end up winning this poll or anything, so why let it trigger you? It's a friggin internet poll. Don't take these things so seriously.
 
What universe could u spin off of Robin Hood? Lol

The last Robin Hood movie left a lot to be desired, but if it was better, spinoffs could include Ivanhoe, the Templars, the Black Knight/Richard the Lion Heart.
 
There's the Trading Places cinematic universe. The Duke brothers appeared in Coming to America as a couple of homeless people after they had been put out of business and lost their fortune.

And how about the Fugitive cinematic universe? Tommy Lee Jones starred in US Marshalls which now chronicled his adventures instead of Harrison Ford.
 
Ah, good ones. If we expanded it to TV shows as well you could have NBC's Expanded Chicago Universe, the Law & Order Universe. The latter could include Homicide, The Wire and even The X-Files, since Detective Munch appeared in those shows too.
 

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
202,288
Messages
22,079,640
Members
45,880
Latest member
Heartbeat
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"