Kyalesyin
Sidekick
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2006
- Messages
- 4,532
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
****ing title was supposed to be 'zombie murder'. I can't type when I'm hungry it seems....
Scared the hell outta me first time I read this, since I sleepwalk sometimes, when I'm really stressed.
Basically the guy argued that since he was not in conscious control of himself, he should not be held accountable for his actions. The court agreed and let him go free.
Right now, I call bull****. I can sleepwalk into my lounge and turn on the light sure, but I think driving a car that distance isn't possible asleep.
What do you lot think?
http://www.lakesidepress.com/pulmonary/Sle...leep-murder.htmKENNETH PARKS CASE. Kenneth Parks, a 23-year-old Toronto man with a wife and infant daughter, was suffering from severe insomnia caused by joblessness and gambling debts. Early in the morning of May 23, 1987 he arose, got in his car and drove 23 kilometers to his in-laws' home. He stabbed to death his mother-in-law, whom he loved and who had once referred to him as "a gentle giant." Parks also assaulted his father in law, who survived the attack. He then drove to the police and said "I think I have killed some people . . . my hands," only then realizing he had severely cut his own hands. Under police arrest he was taken to the hospital where he underwent repair of several flexor tendons of both hands.
Because he could not remember anything about the murder and assault, had no motive for the crime whatsoever, and did have a history of sleepwalking, his team of defense experts (psychiatrists, a psychologist, a neurologist and a sleep specialist) concluded Ken Parks was 'asleep' when he committed the crime, and therefore unaware of his actions. To quote from a medical review of the case, Homicidal somnambulism: a case report (Sleep 1994;17:253-64):
* "the legal defense was, therefore, one of homicide during noninsane automatism as part of a presumed episode of somnambulism...the defendant did not have any preexisting "disease of the mind" withing the meaning of... the Canadian Criminal Code. There was no evidence for psychosis or other mental pathology. Moreover, it was believed that the clustering of such a number of triggering factors was extremely unlikely to occur again, so that the possibility of recurrence of sleepwalking with aggression was considered extremely remote."
Parks' sleepwalking defense proved successful and on May 25, 1988, the jury rendered a verdict of not guilty. Subsequently Parks was also acquitted of the attempted murder of his father-in-law. The government appealed the decision and in 1992 the Canadian Supreme Court upheld the acquittals (R v. Parks, August 27, 1992).
Scared the hell outta me first time I read this, since I sleepwalk sometimes, when I'm really stressed.
Basically the guy argued that since he was not in conscious control of himself, he should not be held accountable for his actions. The court agreed and let him go free.
Right now, I call bull****. I can sleepwalk into my lounge and turn on the light sure, but I think driving a car that distance isn't possible asleep.
What do you lot think?