🇮🇷 The Iran Thread II

Will the United States go to war with Iran in either 2012 or 2013?

  • Yes, definitely.

  • Possibly.

  • I dont know.

  • Probably not.

  • Definitely not.


Results are only viewable after voting.
Yeah I doubt they'd send that tugboat face off the colossal naval ships the US have.

This is probably some kind of elaborate joke.

While Irans other military branches aren't something to nod off, I know their Navy isn't anywhere near as sophisticated as what the US has.
 
I popped on CNN a few minutes ago, and see this here already.


Skynet :cmad:
 
Early major withdrawal from both Iraq and Afghanistan were the first indication that the US was already suspecting Iran.

Now all these reports of nuclear weapon activity suspicions of Iran coming from Israel, US, and the UN/IAEA.

Things aren't looking good. I can give a pretty good guess right about now where the next major theater of war will be.
 
^I sensed too that a withdrawal from Iraq was relaxing resources long enough to gear up for a much larger war in Iran. They delayed withdrawal from Afghanistan could be happening for this reason to to keep bases nearby for an invasion.
 
It seems that its more likely that Israel will attack Iran than the U.S. will. Not that likely but more likely than we will.


http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...or-iran-amid-speculation-over-israeli-strike/

The Obama administration is cautioning the international community to stick with economic sanctions against Iran, as developments in Israel and at the United Nations fuel speculation about a possible military strike being pushed by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

Iran has returned to the front of the foreign policy agenda, as the U.N. atomic agency prepares to release a key report next week on Tehran's nuclear program. It is expected to reveal intelligence suggesting Iran made computer models of a nuclear warhead, among other details, though the Iranian foreign minister calls the claims a fabrication.

The report follows a tense week in Israel, where press reports pulsed with anonymous claims that Netanyahu was trying to rally support in the cabinet for a military strike on Iran. The government fanned the debate by test-firing a missile Wednesday capable of carrying a nuclear warhead and striking Iran.

Sources close to senior Israeli cabinet officials told Fox News that senior ministers who used to oppose a strike are now for it.

They believe sanctions won't be tough enough on Iran, and point to Israel's 1981 attack on an Iraqi nuclear facility -- which was never rebuilt -- as compelling precedent.

But other analysts warn the situation 20 years ago in Iraq is not like the current situation in Iran, where nuclear sites are spread out and harder to penetrate.

U.S. officials have pushed back on the reports in the Israeli media.

"We have said many times in the last weeks and months that we do not seek a military confrontation with Iran," State Department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland said Thursday.

Nuland added on Friday that the U.S. had been "in contact" with the Israelis on Iran in recent days, but stressed the importance of pursuing the sanctions route.

"I don't want to wade too deeply into Israeli internal issues here and press speculation there. Our track with the Israelis, our conversation with the Israelis, our conversation with all of our international partners with regard to Iran, is about increasing economic pressure, increasing enforcement of existing sanctions, so that Iran will come back into compliance," she said.

Deputy National Security Adviser for Strategic Communications Ben Rhodes told reporters in Cannes, France, that Washington is focused on the "diplomatic strategy."

He said that approach "increases the pressure on the Iranians, through financial pressure, through economic sanctions, through diplomatic isolation."

President Obama also stressed the need to maintain "unprecedented international pressure on Iran to meet its obligations."

Ahead of the release of the U.N. report, Nuland said the U.S. expects the report will underscore that "Iran is not meeting its obligations to the international community."

Asked whether the U.S. is looking at more sanctions, she said: "I would say that we are always in the process, both nationally and with our partners, of seeing what more we could ... do economically to catch Iran's attention."

The International Atomic Energy Agency plans to reveal previously undisclosed details on alleged secret work by Tehran on nuclear arms.

In response, Iran's Foreign Minister Ali Akbar Salehi accused the IAEA of giving in to U.S. pressure to level accusations against Iran, which insists its nuclear program is only for peaceful aims like energy production.

"Iran has already responded to the alleged studies in 117 pages. We've said time and again that these are forgeries similar to faked notes," Salehi told a news conference in Tehran.

Salehi, Iran's former nuclear chief, asserted that allegations proven false in the past are being reproduced.

Meanwhile, some believe the chatter in Israel about a possible strike is just a maneuver to set the stage for tougher sanctions.

Paul Brannan, with the Institute for Science and International Security, said the reports serve as "scene-setting" in advance of the IAEA report.

"I think Israel's trying to increase pressure in support of getting more countries to acquiesce to sanctions against Iran," he said.

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...peculation-over-israeli-strike/#ixzz1cta5owfN
 
Regardless the US will be right there behind them if Israel does attack. You can bet your bottom dollar on that.
 
If Obama wants the Jewish vote he will. But the White House will doubtless want Israel to hold off on any such attack until after the election. The question is, will the Israelis be willing to wait another year?
 
Israeli military threats against Iran explained



If Israel, NATO, the U.S. or another does the bombing, it doesn't really matter. Why does it kept getting ignored that the world economy let alone the European and American ones cannot afford this conflict? Oil cut off, huge military caused deficit, fuel prices increase, terrorist attacks on infrastructure in Europe and U.S. SOIL, the unemployed needing education and training going to die in a war that will be so disastrous it will need a draft to keep up, and the damage to international shipping if Iran closes the Straits of Hormuz. To bomb Iran would be pure economic suicide! Hey maybe this is how the banks will be able to finally enslave all of us now.
 
Last edited:
Its not just about nuclear weapons, its about nuclear power.

Nuclear power means cities becoming more developed, it means a boost in Iran's development; The stronger the Iranian regime gets geo-politically and at home, the more worried its Arab neighbors become of it's influence in the region.
 
This will catch flak, but if it was contained, we should just let Israel and Iran duke it out before Iran gets it's nukes. End this crap now. Whoever loses this war, we win. Iran's nuclear dreams would be squashed, or Israel is beaten and Iran/terrorist cells don't have much more beef with us.

I am just tired of these idiots. I feel like their 5 minutes of fame are up, and I want them to go bye-bye. Be done. Piss off. Those extremists on both sides, that lead the way, and downright delusional idiots and they need to die. Die, or a real life Monty Python and the Holy Grail takes place with cops swooping in out of nowhere and either arresting or straight jacketing everyone single person. Thats a fitting end to even a real life story, because these people really need plenty of counseling and drugs(maybe medical marijuana), or they need to die in jail.
 
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"