SpideyVille
Walking out the Desert
- Joined
- Feb 8, 2008
- Messages
- 24,524
- Reaction score
- 5
- Points
- 31
Isn't the whole costume change, or at least the lost of red tights in every current version of Superman, due to the lawsuit?
Thanks for the article. I remember that now. It came out the week after the Finale aired.
I'm not sure I buy into their explanation. What purpose would they have in teasing the suit, and using the CGI Superman if they never had any intention of letting Tom wear the tights?
Something is off in this picture.
Tom was a producer too. He was in on this decision regardless. He's to blame one way or the other.
Superman's coming out part to the world was going to be something BIG. Given the show's budget it was only ever going to happen with CG. They weren't going to put Tom on wires in a costume against a green screen or scale model of Apokolips.
Them using a CG Superman for those scenes has no correlation on ever creating and putting Tom in an actual suit. You're adding 1 + 1 and coming up with 3.
![]()
Welling had an "Executive Producer" credit which he only got the final two seasons. His creative input into the show was minimal except for the episodes he actually directed. He wasn't hatching plot lines especially ones that would culminate the 10 year run of the show.
Cut the guy a break people. The guy could come out and say "I spent on $1 million on a custom suit for myself and tried to wear it on set but security tackled me and tore it off." and yet some of you would still hold him at fault. I just dont get it?
Smallville does greenscreen and wirework quite often. It's well within the show's budget.
![]()
Not sure what your point is? They did CG shots of Clark as the Blur (red/blue and black suit) and CG of Ollie as Green Arrow. Hell, the even CG'd a red cape onto Ollie when he was trying to throw people off Clark's trail.It was just intentional for it to involve him not wearing the suit.
It's no coincidence they had to use shots like this:
![]()
And you're acting like you have one iota of knowledge that he was even ever asked to wear a costume. Every interview you can find states that was never the case. If you're going to convict the man, burden of proof is on you to prove him guilty. Even going back to the Millar and Gough days there was talk of the show simply ending on a shirt rip.You're acting like he had no say over whether he could wear the suit or not, and Brian and Kelly maliciously conspired to keep him from wearing it.
If Welling wanted it, it would have happened.
Not sure what your point is? They did CG shots of Clark as the Blur (red/blue and black suit) and CG of Ollie as Green Arrow. Hell, the even CG'd a red cape onto Ollie when he was trying to throw people off Clark's trail. .
And you're acting like you have one iota of knowledge that he was even ever asked to wear a costume. Every interview you can find states that was never the case. If you're going to convict the man, burden of proof is on you to prove him guilty .
I was very glad to see that they kept the red tights for the Finale, but was really disappointed when I saw them change it for the comic. I still haven't read it, but I know Lex makes a reference to him changing his suit again, but I kind of wish they kept it because I just don't like the full blue suit.
http://www.comicbookresources.com/?page=article&id=36952
Having told stories essentially with Clark Kent for so long, how do you make" Smallville: Season 11" different then what readers would get from "Action Comics" or "Superman?"
It's in the title -- it's "Smallville." It's an ensemble piece with Clark Kent at its core. These are continuations of the characters roughly two million people a week, half a year each year, for a decade tuned in to see. If you're someone who stopped watching the show in the early years, come on back. They aren't in high school anymore. He's in the suit. Like, all over the place. You're going to get Superman action. You're going to get derring-do from Green Arrow. Lois and Clark are together -- and happy. So there's some romance there. And Chloe. And Chloe! Chloe Sullivan is here -- you won't find her anywhere else (as far as I know!).
Do you have to tread carefully moving forward as to not dovetail into Clark Kent/Superman's 70-plus year history? Or do the New 52 and the fact this is set in the "Smallville" universe allow you to move quite freely?
There are nods to elements from the DC of the past and present that are going to pop up from time to time, but the book is rolling straight out of the world of the show. So far, the only lining-up/branding hiccup has been the coloring on the Clark's hero outfit. We had the "Superman Returns" version seen briefly in the finale, and DC and I were on the same page on wanting to make the look for the book its own. We've got a new version that's a little bit old, a little bit new, a lot "Smallville." There's a very simple story reason for the change that's spelled out in the second chapter.
Speaking of those first ten pages, its obvious that at some point that were going to see Smallvilles Superman in a costume, flying. How did it feel for you to see that for the first time, when the artwork began coming in?
It was great. We tried to make as much of a moment as we could, of a head to toe reveal, of Clark in his slightly new Superman suit. Its not specifically the Superman Returns style suit that we had seen frozen in the Fortress and on that wee little CG Clark in the finale.
Theres a very easy reason for why hes changed his suit, which literally is a line between Lois and Clark at the top of Week 2. I think it makes total sense.
Its great. We do it as much as we possibly can. Everyones been waiting for so long to see Clark in the suit, so now that we can do it, were going to stretch our legs with that.
The show probably would have not gone as long as it did if he was in the show. To me and just my opinion of the guy from sr, to his chuck guest spot. He is a very lousy blank slate of an actor. Sure tom was fresh at the start of the show's run. But he grew and develop a lot over the yrs.
The suit deaal still though as we been told countless times the suit wasn't rreally what they where going for. The show still was always the journey clark took to take the mantle and wear the suit. Then him wearing the suit. Sure I still would have loved at least a full suit of tom. But I get what they where going for.
My point is there were plenty of shots that *could* have shown Tom in the suit, in closeups that didn't involve heavy action.
There wouldn't be any interviews where he overtly says he's against the suit.
He did, however, dodge the question of whether he wore the suit during many of the S10 press interviews, including the Finale interviews.
I may have came into the game late, but way before Season 10.. there seemed to be a sentiment among fans that Welling wasn't interested in playing Superman or wearing the tights. Not sure if there were any offhanded remarks or actions he made to substanciate that.
I agree they probably never should have teased the suit in season 9 finale and all of ten. Since they should have done just a new blur suit maybe have gone in line a bit more like ga suit ans then show a sv suit for final to a degree.
Heck, I would have been fine with Clark having saved Earth in his red leather jacket blur outfit and then coming down back to Metropolis where we see him on top of the roof and people cheering at the sight of him. Then AFTER that, he'd go to the FOS and finally be deemed "good enough" by Jor-el to get the suit and then cut to the flash forward into the future.
You mean like this one? Where he actually wore the top to a suit for a close-up?
![]()
with Amanda Waller having been brought back, etc.