I'm sure I am in the minority, but I don't always go to the movies to be entertained in the same manner in which I think you are explaining.
There are movies I go see because I want to see what its about and hopefully it will give me food for thought. Things I can think about after I leave the theater.
That can be the themes explored, the cinematography down to the score. I find those to be just as entertaining and fun.
But I get what you mean, you were disappointed. I had some disappointments as well, but I still enjoyed this movie. Obviously many others did as well.
I definitely prefer Ad Astra over Interstellar... for one I can actually hear the dialogue clearly.![]()
Perhaps if i knew what the movie is i wouldnt have gone to the theater and waited to watch it at home. I wouldnt be disappointed then but would still feel its a lucklaster movie imho.
Yea I hear you totally... I actually thought this movie would be about one thing and it turned out to be something else. So while I was disappointed mainly because I've come to expect certain things from Sc-Fi movies these days, I still find myself thinking about this movie. Oddly and refreshingly.
I would recommend not being disappointed solely on the basis of it not being the type of sci fi film you expect. Otherwise, you're limiting yourself to experiencing new types of sci fi movies that can enrich the genre for you. All art deserves to be judged on its own terms.
That was actually my point.
The movie makes you think and kinda says appreciate what's in front of you as opposed to the cliche "always be searching for the new."
Yeah I got that, but for me the movie ends with a whimper. He kills the whole crew of the rocket he takes to Neptune, and suffers no consequences?
They addressed this early on - saying they couldn't locate Project Lima and couldn't even confirm it was still around, until they got out there to it.Also, he goes to save his Dad and fails miserably, they could have just shot that space station from the sky and saved all of the efforts made.
Yeah I got that, but for me the movie ends with a whimper.He kills the whole crew of the rocket he takes to Neptune, and suffers no consequences? Also, he goes to save his Dad and fails miserably, they could have just shot that space station from the sky and saved all of the efforts made. I enjoyed the movie up until the ending, but it made everything else that happened feel pointless for me.
Um, he acted in defense... he shouldn't be in trouble. He stated his plan, then recorded their actions. The scene spoke for itself.
.He illegally climbed onto a ship he was specifically told he wasn't aloud to be on and killed all of the crew. Sure it was an accident but the crew were acting in self defence trying to subdue him
Yet the whole reason he was there to begin with was because he was trying to finish his "mission" that the government had sent him on.
Because those aren't the point of the story? It's like an adventure movie. Not every thing that happens in adventure movies necessarily lead back to the main plot.The Liv Tyler subplot was under-developed and felt pointless.
I was fine with Pitt's performance but, I think the movie needed a more focused plot. Like what was the point of the space pirate stuff? They never revisited that at all. Or the thing with the derelict space station. Too many narrative red herrings IMO.
Because those aren't the point of the story? It's like an adventure movie. Not every thing that happens in adventure movies necessarily lead back to the main plot.