Ant-Man vs. Ant-Man & Wasp

[Erzengel]

versus

 

[Lilbaz]

Do we have to pick? Enjoyed both, they were good fun.

 

[NotNickFury]

Yeah, I'll go with the first one.

 

[Kahran Ramsus]

Ant-Man. More focused narrative and turning it into a heist film gave it a more unique feel. I liked Ant-Man and The Wasp, but it was kind of generic and forgettable.

 

[AVEITWITHJAMON]

Haven’t seen the sequel yet so I won’t vote.

But I think Ant-Man is of the most under rated MCU movies.

 

[Drizzle]

I preferred the second film but the first one has a better villain in that it actually has a villain, as middle of the road as Yellowjacket falls on the MCU villains list.

 

[pr0xyt0xin]

Ant-Man. More focused narrative and turning it into a heist film gave it a more unique feel. I liked Ant-Man and The Wasp, but it was kind of generic and forgettable.

I preferred the second film but the first one has a better villain in that it actually has a villain, as middle of the road as Yellowjacket falls on the MCU villains list.

Just loosely replying to you two. I think not having a villain was almost more realistic. I mean, at this point having a straight out villain 20 films in a row seems almost trite. A conflict or a threat, sure. But some of these films are gonna need to sacrifice pure villainy to tell unique stories. The story they told with [BLACKOUT]Ghost/Goliath[/BLACKOUT] was unique. And the real narrative was an adventure to the quantum realm to find Jan. It was basically a taste of what F4 should strive to be if you ask me.