so you're saying that before the internet every superhero movie was badand after they were good?
i present to you the fantastic four films, elektra, X3, spider-man 3, blade: trinity, all made after the internet, all were viewd by the vast amount of people as being bad.
so to put it a better way:
star wars movies before the internet > star wars movies after the internet
find flaw in that...
Well let's be fair with those:
No FF fan liked the original or second one, and it wasn't like they used what anyone thought was the best of the FF in those.
Nobody really wanted an elektra movie and no one ever wanted ben afleck as daredevil.
X3 failed because it lost the serious quality of the first two with people and characters over plot and development.
SM3? Yeah, sony insisted venom be put in over the objections of everyone. And who the hell wanted a dancing peter parker? No one here.
Blade: Trinity lost everything to hokey qualities the movie makers love and we all hate.
^I would say you gave a great list of examples of filmmakers disregarding the wants of the fans because they know better (League of Extraordinary Gentlemen anyone?) and thinking that they'd get us anyway because we're fans.
While I don't think every fan knows best, I'd take a standard fan of any mediums opinion on what makes the art great over that of a team of hollywood aholes trying to hit as many target audiences as possible (Transformers) while not even liking or understanding the medium they're trying to use.
I think the idea the internet changed things is both right and wrong. It wasn't like the internet invented this whole new thing, fans had been *****ing about how badly their favorite mediums were being raped by hollywood for years, what the internet did is make those *****ing voices louder and got to more people. It became harder to ignore fans because you've just got to make this a PG-13 movie and somehow involve a young boy a love interest and a talking puppy cause that's what would hit the most people.