Wilhelm-Scream
Avenger
- Joined
- Nov 19, 2004
- Messages
- 46,284
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
Only in the Rape Room.
It's all restricted to the Rape Room.
It's all restricted to the Rape Room.
I'm going to start of with: "Moms" how many mother's do you have? Is this a harem situation where you have a very lucky father, or is it a lesbian type one where Dad's gone and it's just Mom and Mom?My moms is extremely edgy about profanity. Me and my sister were arguing immensely the other day, and I got extremely pissed due to my being angry about something earlier that day and went to the b-word, which I never do. She tells my mom, who in turn is on the verge of crying, and says that was a very immoral thing for me to do. Granted, we're all patched up now, but that's her take on immoral things...worst thing to do is use profanity, especially involving the fam.
I'm going to start of with: "Moms" how many mother's do you have? Is this a harem situation where you have a very lucky father, or is it a lesbian type one where Dad's gone and it's just Mom and Mom?
second... could you clear up your langauge? "I got extremely pissed due to my being angry about..." This is redundant. I was angry about something that happened earlier. That one sentence was all you needed.
Third... and this one isn't criticism, just making sure I understand you. Your mother started crying because you used the B-word? She says it's immoral to use the B-word?
Well take her a copy of the Bill of rights, and point out freedom of speech. and then call her a wahrpoofy. Sound's nice right? It's a word I just made up... It means *****, but it's not the word *****.
I don't give a larp if you're purple. You're a goddamn american. You will be held to decent standards of grammar.I'm black. That should explain everything. I doubt it's the same in your family.
God damn*I don't give a larp if you're purple. You're a goddamn american.<single space after period> You will be held to decent standards of grammar.
And your Mom still sounds puritanical regarding expletives.
A recent discussion with a couple of friends made me think what everyone thought. They say everything is inherently right or wrong. I think everything is relative depending on who is viewing it.
All three of us are Christians, but I believe that just because God says it's wrong doesn't make it so. I believe that what is a sin isn't necessarily wrong. I guess I'm a moral relativist and they are moral absolutists.
This does not mean I don't have my own opinions on different morals, just that all morals are good and wrong, depending on how you look at it.
sigh......
Oh Dear. Wilhelm and Krit have got Religion in their nostrils. Now they're going to try and tell people what they believe diregarding the fact that people as individuals have differing views and differing interpretations even within the same religion. And that we admit to being flawed beings who ATTEMPT to be like God and Jesus, but ultimately fail. They'll also neglect to realize that for these reasons Catholics created the sacrament of reconciliation.
I like you... and though it is often taught as wrong, it is not a firm rule that you cannot begin a sentence with a conjunction.God damn*
American*
It's grammatically gauche to start a sentence with "and."
Get 'em Krit. I agree. When you take something on faith, you should admit it.You have no excuse to roll your eyes. You have no proof outside of the bible to back up your statements.
We can't help it, we're allergic to faith based statements that are paraded around as fact.
Simply put, Jesus stressed the fact that no human for any reason can enter Heaven solely by their own merit. Every one of us have sinned in some way, and thus fallen short of God's glory. Because of that, we needed a Savior to be our intercessor, and God provided one by sending Jesus Christ to take our penalty.Zoken said:So saying you put your faith in Christ isn't saying that you've "done enough" to get into Heaven? Saying "I'm a Christian" isn't saying "I've done enough" to get into Heaven? That isn't even the sort of thing I was talking about, but there's a small hole in your argument.
You're confusing "a way to God" and "a path to God". Strictly speaking, there is no path to God, because a "path" is something you travel by your own strength alone, to reach a specific destination. People trying to earn their way into Heaven by doing good deeds are still trying to be "good enough", when Jesus said that the human heart contains all sorts of evil. In God's eyes, we are fallen, and thus not worthy of His Kingdom on our own. But by placing our faith in Christ as Lord and Savior, God washes away our sins, and welcomes us with open arms because His Son paid the price, and we reap the eternal rewards.So it isn't just faith in him, like you said above. There also has to be repentance. Is that the Path?
It still doesn't change the fact the he was teaching people to trust solely in themselves for higher understanding...and as I've mentioned earlier, that's like playing with matches and hoping not to get burned.You do know the Buddha didn't sway people from Christianity right? He drew people from Hinduism.
Paul transcribed many books in the New Testament, including the letter to the Galatians. However, Paul makes distinct points in Corinthians, saying that some of his words are his own, and the rest have been instructed by God. Personally, I figure that if God has enough power to create the cosmos, He's definitely strong enough to influence people so His intentions are loud and clear.Galatians is a letter written by the apostle Paul, correct? This means that It was written by a human, and as you have pointed out numerous times... humans are flawed and fallible.
First off, God did not create bad place with the intention or purpose of it being populated by humans. bad place was created for Satan and the angels who fell with him. But God also knows that sin equals eternal death, and the only way of escape is through a completely pure sacrifice. Humans can't do that, because of our fallen nature. So, as mentioned before, God sent Jesus to fulfill that purpose. Thanks to Him, we now have the choice to either repent before God and have faith in Him for salvation, or reject Him and receive our original punishment in bad place by default.Does your god damn to bad place people who have never heard the message of Christ or any Abrahamic religion?
I'm black. That should explain everything. I doubt it's the same in your family.
Actually you're right, it was Fish-Bulb who tried to tell me who I believed.
Do you need shoes or special classes to dance around my actual question that well? By the way.Simply put, Jesus stressed the fact that no human for any reason can enter Heaven solely by their own merit. Every one of us have sinned in some way, and thus fallen short of God's glory. Because of that, we needed a Savior to be our intercessor, and God provided one by sending Jesus Christ to take our penalty.
Actually the difference between "Way" and "Path" is that "Path" is more specific and narrow. a "Way" is a general direction.You're confusing "a way to God" and "a path to God". Strictly speaking, there is no path to God, because a "path" is something you travel by your own strength alone, to reach a specific destination. People trying to earn their way into Heaven by doing good deeds are still trying to be "good enough", when Jesus said that the human heart contains all sorts of evil. In God's eyes, we are fallen, and thus not worthy of His Kingdom on our own. But by placing our faith in Christ as Lord and Savior, God washes away our sins, and welcomes us with open arms because His Son paid the price, and we reap the eternal rewards.
You really don't get that Buddha had no idea about Christianity. You condemn people that had no idea that the Abrahamic God even existed, much less that he had a son.It still doesn't change the fact the he was teaching people to trust solely in themselves for higher understanding...and as I've mentioned earlier, that's like playing with matches and hoping not to get burned.
Did Paul have free will or not? He's human and flawed. THe fact that he translated the books (and wrote some) are why people think the bible is unreliable.Paul transcribed many books in the New Testament, including the letter to the Galatians. However, Paul makes distinct points in Corinthians, saying that some of his words are his own, and the rest have been instructed by God. Personally, I figure that if God has enough power to create the cosmos, He's definitely strong enough to influence people so His intentions are loud and clear.
Seriously, take that dancing around the question to TV... a presidential debate or something. Do people who've never heard of the Abrahamic God or Jesus Christ go to Heaven or bad place according to your Christianity?First off, God did not create bad place with the intention or purpose of it being populated by humans. bad place was created for Satan and the angels who fell with him. But God also knows that sin equals eternal death, and the only way of escape is through a completely pure sacrifice. Humans can't do that, because of our fallen nature. So, as mentioned before, God sent Jesus to fulfill that purpose. Thanks to Him, we now have the choice to either repent before God and have faith in Him for salvation, or reject Him and receive our original punishment in bad place by default.
Not God's call? I'm sorry, who judges us then? We make the choice, yes, But we are sentenced by someone else.Ultimately, it's not God's call where we wind up after death, because He gave us the choice, and will honor it either way. Abraham himself worshiped God before Christ's time, and God blessed his entire line of descendants. David was called "a man after God's own heart", and I sincerely doubt they'd wind up in bad place, because they showed genuine remorse and repentance. For those who have never heard about Christ, I think God checks their hearts. If they've lived their lives in service to Him, then I think He honors that. But for those who've heard about Jesus even once, then they have no excuse. They know what's required, and the choice rests with them.
Every action... every second... we're either doing the right thing or the wrong thing. We can feel in our heart which is which if we stop and try.
Good and evil are not relative.
Neitzche was wrong because he was merely an empiricist. Gathering empiricle evidence is good but to make it the totality of your reasoning is to miss out on all possibility of spirituality.
So, to sum up: Bad Fred, Bad!