Batman: Arkham Knight - Part 2

Status
Not open for further replies.
Looking at the skyscraper background of Gotham from Arkham City. I'm glad that we finally get to explore it all in Arkham Knight!
2v30wlf.jpg
 
So who else will be going back to AC in AK to check out how the area is now?,I really hope we can drive to AA even if the buildings are closed but I would just like to walk around the area
 
I assume we'll get some possible skin reveals at Comic-Con.

SO clay-face still in the game
cG4Y3H9.png


I thought that was a reference to Basil Karlo's origin, where they re-made his Clayface movie and that causes him to go on a killing spree.

Imagine the nerve of the Hollywood producers to make a movie about him now.
 
Will they do Burton/Nolan skins? Since this is Rocksteady's last Batman game it would be perfect time do that.

Can you imagine seeing the 89 suit rendered in this beautiful engine?
 
Every cover art focuses on Wayne Enterprise tower on all three Arkham games
sg0nti.jpg
2afbl2t.jpg
2znwqxh.jpg
 
I really could do without Bane being in this game. As much as I loved Origins it did sort of feel like "The Bane Show" after a while, and I feel like they dedicated waaay too much time to a character who's dreadfully uninteresting even on the best of days, much less "before" when he was just a guy.
 
I really could do without Bane being in this game. As much as I loved Origins it did sort of feel like "The Bane Show" after a while, and I feel like they dedicated waaay too much time to a character who's dreadfully uninteresting even on the best of days, much less "before" when he was just a guy.

I agree. Origins gave us the Bane we should have had and unfortunately, we can't have that again. We either get Bane from Asylum and City and brace ourselves for more disappointment. Or we get Origins Bane, but not without the writing equivalent of a magic wand that undoes anything permanent.

Given this, I'd prefer no Bane at all in this game.
 
While I'd love to have a competent and not severely roided out Bane somewhat involved in the final game, I'd rather not have him at all then to further butcher him anymore. Besides there are plenty of other villains to choose from in the rouges gallery.
 
Can you imagine seeing the 89 suit rendered in this beautiful engine?

I would say "shut up and take my money!"

Every cover art focuses on Wayne Enterprise tower on all three Arkham games
sg0nti.jpg
2afbl2t.jpg
2znwqxh.jpg

Good eye CK, I wonder if the final boss bsttle is at Wayne Tower?


As for Bane he had good treatment from WB Montreal so I wanna see Two-Face finally get a good treatment from Rocksteady, they put him too much in the background hopefully AK does some justice for Harvey Dent/Two-Face.
 
Exploring Gotham City glitch arkham city [YT]cD54V5D8wdA[/YT]
 
Not really. It's all about escalation. Batman wears his traditional suit for part of the game, and I'm guessing the Knight shows up and whoops his ass and Bruce decides to upgrade to the armored suit.

Yeah, I can see the storyline logic, I was just thinking that when you introduce a new character you don't usually want to step on their gimmick.
 
So I was fantasizing about this game earlier and thought what if the events almost the entire arkham franchise was some fear toxin hallucination? From the point in the first game when scarecrow first injected batman to now, is all a crazy long fear toxin and nothing in this franchise has really happened. That'd be insane. I know its not likely though
 
Not sure if pulling a Dallas could work
 
So I was fantasizing about this game earlier and thought what if the events almost the entire arkham franchise was some fear toxin hallucination? From the point in the first game when scarecrow first injected batman to now, is all a crazy long fear toxin and nothing in this franchise has really happened. That'd be insane. I know its not likely though

ummm-no.gif
 
So I was fantasizing about this game earlier and thought what if the events almost the entire arkham franchise was some fear toxin hallucination? From the point in the first game when scarecrow first injected batman to now, is all a crazy long fear toxin and nothing in this franchise has really happened. That'd be insane. I know its not likely though

I'd throw my game out the window.
 
While I'd love to have a competent and not severely roided out Bane somewhat involved in the final game, I'd rather not have him at all then to further butcher him anymore. Besides there are plenty of other villains to choose from in the rouges gallery.

Yea if they're gonna keep ruining him, then just leave him the hell out. I still hope RS will fix their screw up and give us the real Bane. If that's the case, I'd hope he'd be a big part of the story.
 
I saw the E3 demo.

There were quite a few scenes with the Arkham Knight. Based off the video, Knight is under the employ of Scarecrow.

Based on Arkham Knight's dialogue, he sounds youthful and male, so my automatic assumptions are Jason Todd or some aged up Damian Wayne. Are those options too predictable?

My fear is that Scarecrow being the mastermind is just a fake out and there is someone else behind it all. My other fear is that they will do a goofy, convoluted reveal for Arkham Knight.
 
I am getting real sick of villain fake outs. It's so played out now, it's like the new "he planned to get caught all along!"

Whatever happened to the good old days when you didn't have to constantly reveal that the real mastermind was actually the dog all along?
 
Yeah I could see them having Scarecrow being a puppet to the Arkham Knight. I really hope that's not the case, but after Hugo Strange in Arkham City, it's very possible.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

Members online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,324
Messages
22,085,741
Members
45,885
Latest member
RadioactiveMan
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"