I preffer non-killing Batman, if only because the minute he starts offing people, he has no rogues gallery. We know he can get into Arkham whenever he pleases, so what would there be to stop him from going in there and just capping every last inmate one at a time, starting with the Joker?
DKR is so inconsistent with that, it's unbelievable. In the same chapter, Batman blows away the child hostage with that Rambo gun but then doesn't want to "cross the line [he] made for himself years ago" with the mutant leader. Isn't he supposed to hate guns anyway?
DKR is so inconsistent with that, it's unbelievable. In the same chapter, Batman blows away the child hostage with that Rambo gun but then doesn't want to "cross the line [he] made for himself years ago" with the mutant leader. Isn't he supposed to hate guns anyway?
Batman shouldn't kill. Non-killing Batman is a hero. Some people prefer this "avenging death"-Batman, but not me. IMO Batman is all about being a hero.
Why would he use guns if he hates them??? This brings to light his mental instability.
I'd start with somebody small and let Joker sweat it out. But that's just me...
And running around in a blue and grey costume that looks like a flying rat....throwing away millions of dollars fighting criminals......breaking bone after bone and risking his life on a nightly bases doesnt "bring to light his mental instability" in your eyes?????
Wow talk about the obvious![]()
His gun issues further brings to light his mental instability.
How do you figure????I'd lay odds on any anti-gun activist useing a gun if one was pointed at him or his sons head.
Batman has used guns when one was not pointed at his head.