I'm going to vote for Green Goblin, he is the greatest of the three, he is Spidey's archnemesis. I think he's had the biggest impact on Peter Parker. Doctor Octopus is also another heavy hitter in this issue.
But Venom is still my personal favorite.
How so? Yes, he tried to marry Aunt May but she got over it. Yes, he beat up Black Cat, but she got better. Yes, he slapped Spidey around after their first battle but then Ock was afraid of him for a while.
How so? Yes, he tried to marry Aunt May but she got over it. Yes, he beat up Black Cat, but she got better. Yes, he slapped Spidey around after their first battle but then Ock was afraid of him for a while.
Venom is Spider-man's opposite. Doc Ock is the eye candy.
I had never read Venom in the comic books, since they came after my time. Because of that, I didn't have a natural inclination toward him. And when I read those comics, at [producer] Avi Arad's urging, I didn't understand where Venom's humanity was. I know that kids think he looks cool, and they think he's a good villain for Spider-Man. I actually didn't. What was it about Peter's own makeup that this villain represented some weaker or darker side to? Just looking like a dark version of him is not enough for me. The more I read [Venom stories], the less interested I became.
And you ask how he's a heavy hitter? Shame on you, Demo. SHAME!
Ready for some sermonizing with your popcorn? You'll get plenty in Spider-Man 3, a summer action flick that aims to enlighten. Directed and co-written by Sam Raimi (with his brother Ivan, a longtime collaborator, and Oscar-winning screenwriter Alvin Sargent), the movie weaves cautionary bromides about the evils of pride and vengeance into all its big action scenes. Just as he finished the film and prepped to launch into a marathon of round-the-world premieres, Raimi told EW about his love-hate feelings for the villain Venom, his affection for Peter Parker over Spider-Man, and how turning Parker to the dark side in this movie kept him awake at night.
ENTERTAINMENT WEEKLY: Are you a little Spidey'ed out right now?
SAM RAIMI: I've been working on these films since 1999. It's refreshing not to be working on the next one — just to be focusing on the completion [and promotion] of this film.
What's different the third time around?
It's the most ambitious of the three movies, in the sense that it takes on more story and more characters.
One of those characters, Venom, is a newer villain in the comic books. He's from the '80s and '90s, as opposed to Sandman, who hails way back to issue 4 in the 1960s. Why the new baddie mixed in with such an old one?
I had never read Venom in the comic books, since they came after my time. Because of that, I didn't have a natural inclination toward him. And when I read those comics, at [producer] Avi Arad's urging, I didn't understand where Venom's humanity was. I know that kids think he looks cool, and they think he's a good villain for Spider-Man. I actually didn't. What was it about Peter's own makeup that this villain represented some weaker or darker side to? Just looking like a dark version of him is not enough for me. The more I read [Venom stories], the less interested I became. But then Avi said, ''Look, you've got to be less selfish. You've got to learn what it is these kids love about Venom.'' So I tried to open my mind up. Then Alvin developed a character that I did understand, and did appreciate.
The Spider-Man movies are often described as being romantic soap operas interrupted by occasional action. There's an implication that your heart's not as much in the big action stuff as the relationship stuff. Is that how you see it?
It's always Peter Parker that I love best. Not really Spider-Man, if you must know the truth.
You lay on the problems for Peter in this movie. Trouble with Mary Jane (Kirsten Dunst), the rivalry with Harry Osborn (James Franco) turning really violent, a black alien goo that attaches itself to Peter and turns him evil and sullen before it moves on to another host... Why such heavy weather?
As much as I love Peter, I've noticed that audiences love to watch him getting his butt kicked. They're weird that way. I've seen their faces in the theaters. The best time they have is when Peter is miserable, I think. So I do like to torment the characters, but it's because the audience likes it.
You also seem very suspicious of superhero motives in this movie.
Peter Parker is really still acting on very immature impulses. He's dressing up in this costume. He's a vigilante, making a choice that he's right and others are wrong, and he's tying them up and acting outside the law. He must have a very high opinion of himself. He holds himself above others. But in fact, he's a sinner. These people aren't so foul, and he's not so pure. The kid's out of control.
But aren't some of the things he's done in the first two pictures genuinely heroic?
What he's really acting out as an impulse is, I should have stopped that guy that killed my Uncle Ben, but I didn't. So, I'm gonna stop every next guy, and bring them down. A better lesson might be to understand those that commit wrongs, and aspire to a higher relationship with them. Which might perhaps be forgiveness.
You push Peter pretty far, having him do really hurtful things to Mary Jane and others. Does that create a risk of turning off the audience?
I was in conflict, and had many miserable nights about making this character go bad. I didn't want kids to watch Spider-Man do bad things. They come into the theater and because he's wearing this very cool outfit and has heroic music behind him, they look up to him as a hero. But then I thought, He's on the way to learning a lesson. He's got to do bad things and make mistakes to learn.
What do you mean, you had miserable nights?
Sleeplessness. Agitation. It was very hard for me, going through days and days of writing and shooting scenes where he's affected by his dark side. Tobey felt the same thing. It was hard for us, because we love the goodness within that character. [Pause] We probably should have used more restraint. [Laughs]
Well, it worked for George Lucas and Anakin Skywalker. You sound unsure about what people will make of the story.
Who knows if people will like the picture? It's so unknown. This one's really a step in a different direction. We'll see. We'll see if people want to let their hero go to the dark side.
Posted May 02, 2007 | Order Article Reprints
I guess I would appreciate Ock more if Peter seemed to care more about him.
I dont see him getting maudlin over Capt Stacy.
He forgets Ock's crimes as soon as he is locked away.
I see the point, but he still leave me kinda cold. And I admit, I had no interest in the "Death of the Stacys" story.
I cant put my finger on it, but Otto just doesnt appeal so much to me. He lacks a certain electricity. Not crazy enough, I guess.
Yes, he's crazy but not dress up in a ridiculous costume crazy. He's so...typical.
Oh Demo, you've gone down in my estimations. I thought you were a man of good taste.
Tsk tsk
Mmmmm, yeah trying to blow up a whole city just to prove a point is as sane as they come. Dressing in green spandex and orange boots, that's not crazy, that's the fashion. Not as trendy as purple elf boots, a nightcap, and a handbag full of pumpkin bombs, of course t:
I guess its the fact that Gobby always got away from Spidey that first attracted me. Ock was sort of the typical "villain of the month" who got caught at the end of the issue. And before you say "Gobby always got away because he ran away" ( ) just remember he was up against the Hulk unexpectedly in issue 14. Otto wouldnt have fared well against Hulkster either.
And I still dont see any scans of Peter shaking in his boots around Ock, either.
Yes, I'm being a git today.
Well, it's true. He did run away. Although in fairness to the early stories, Stan did it that way because he wanted to keep Goblin's identity a secret for a while.
As for the Hulk, Goblin didn't fight the Hulk in that issue
You want scans? I can post some if you like. Or do you want some reference issues?
I think you need to have a rest. You're obviously delusional.It's ok. I'm enjoying pwning you
I thought your memory for details was better. Remember how Goblin drew Spidey out to Hollywood with the Enforcers? They ran into the Hulk by accident in a cave.
Scans are fine, thank you.
I think you need to have a rest. You're obviously delusional.
The big green guy being there was enough. Much as I hate to say it, pumpkin bombs dont mean snuff against gamma radiation.I know that. But Goblin never battled him. Spidey did.
Scans from three different stories from three different decades coming right up, just to give you some variety
Hehehehe, we'll see.
I bet you also missed that it was supposed to be the flip side of Uncle Ben's death, too. Peter did act against the villain, and his actions resulted in the loss of a father figure.
The big green guy being there was enough. Much as I hate to say it, pumpkin bombs dont mean snuff against gamma radiation.
Much obliged.
I'll have my yawns ready.
Gwen's death was the flip side of Ben's death. It was played to much greater emotional effect. Who can deny that Gwen's death has had a greater toll on Peter than Capt Stacy's?
Adamantium tentacles would give someone an unfair advantage like that. Sort of like how Norman cleaned Otto's clock in MKSM. Just like how Gobby would have a harder time with Otto if he hadnt been doped up, Otto couldnt have beaten the Hulk without the adamantium tentacles.You're so right, it takes real talent to beat the Hulk, like the way Ock did in Revenge of the Sinister Six
Because Gwen didn't die because of Peter's actions. Peter acted against Ock and Captain Stacy died because of it. In Uncle Ben's death, Peter didn't act against the bad guy, and he lost a father figure.
Yeah, obviously he felt Gwen's death more because he was in love with her. Nobody disputed that. Gwen died because Norman wanted to punish Peter.
Adamantium tentacles would give someone an unfair advantage like that.
Sort of like how Norman cleaned Otto's clock in MKSM.
Otto couldnt have beaten the Hulk without the adamantium tentacles.
Peter didnt act when Gwen died?
*thwip*
*snap*
Peter: Uh oh...