El Bastardo
Literary elitist
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2005
- Messages
- 6,045
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
I wouldn't say that Ellis phones his Marvel work in. It's like saying Grant phones his mainstream DC work in because none of it is (with the possible exception of the 52 space journies) quite as oddball or out there or great as his Seaguy or Joe the Barbarian.
I would call Ellis the biggest "professional writer" in mainstream comics today. He takes his job, he does his job, and it's dependent only on what characters fit what roles as opposed to which characters he likes most, because he's not a fan and he has no crushes on any characters. I think it works perfectly, but then I'm a fan of objectivity.
It's what makes his Thunderbolts run so damn good, though. There's no authorial attachment there. It's just characters on a stage. The same thing goes for his Astonishing run, really, although it is inherently weaker a work than his Thunderbolts was. What hurts Ellis's Astonishing is no different than what hurt Whedon's Astonishing - artist delays. What most people tend to complain about is it's no longer Whedon's Astonishing. Well, no. Because Whedon isn't writing it anymore.
Most of the time, though, you just have to be prepared for tons of technobabble. It didn't flare up badly in Thunderbolts, but it's definitely there in Astonishing. And still none of it's as bad as Ellis's own independent work. Look up the graphic novella "Aetheric Mechanics" sometime. Then you can prepare for head-exploding.
I would call Ellis the biggest "professional writer" in mainstream comics today. He takes his job, he does his job, and it's dependent only on what characters fit what roles as opposed to which characters he likes most, because he's not a fan and he has no crushes on any characters. I think it works perfectly, but then I'm a fan of objectivity.
It's what makes his Thunderbolts run so damn good, though. There's no authorial attachment there. It's just characters on a stage. The same thing goes for his Astonishing run, really, although it is inherently weaker a work than his Thunderbolts was. What hurts Ellis's Astonishing is no different than what hurt Whedon's Astonishing - artist delays. What most people tend to complain about is it's no longer Whedon's Astonishing. Well, no. Because Whedon isn't writing it anymore.
Most of the time, though, you just have to be prepared for tons of technobabble. It didn't flare up badly in Thunderbolts, but it's definitely there in Astonishing. And still none of it's as bad as Ellis's own independent work. Look up the graphic novella "Aetheric Mechanics" sometime. Then you can prepare for head-exploding.