Eddie Dean
Jokerfied
- Joined
- Oct 20, 2005
- Messages
- 17,307
- Reaction score
- 11,765
- Points
- 103
Batman is like Bond. There will never be a definitive version.
Oh I don't think there will ever be a "definitive" actor to play Batman either. I wanna make that clear. I just mean that if you're shooting for the stars he's probably the closest aproximation you can find. Kinda like how, you can't replace Christopher Reeve as the definitive Superman but you can sure as hell try by casting David Corenswet.Pace is great. For me, he's without a doubt the best man for the job. Whether he lands the role or not is another matter entirely, but I fully support him. That said, it's way too early to start calling the man "definitive," even if we're extrapolating, and I totally understand that's what you're doing here.
RDJ as Iron Man.The only person who comes close to being the Christopher Reeve of Batman, imo, is Kevin Conroy. And Conroy was still only definitive in a singular sense. His voice. Reeve was quite literally both.
Reeve was just lightning in a bottle that will probably never be repeated again.
Personally, I consider the term "definitive" to be a subjective and/or personal one. For instance, I really connect with B:TAS Batman and I love the way Tom King writes the character (especially in self-contained stories). Both feel definitive to me in that regard, but really, it's impossible to quantify what is truly definitive. It's probably more appropriate to refer to something as popular if it appeals to a large number of people or occupies a special place in the collective consciousness.Batman is like Bond. There will never be a definitive version.
I which self-contained stories with no Catwoman were all Tom King wrote Batman-wise because he's weirdly excellent in those.Personally, I consider the term "definitive" to be a subjective and/or personal one. For instance, I really connect with B:TAS Batman and I love the way Tom King writes the character (especially in self-contained stories). Both feel definitive to me in that regard, but really, it's impossible to quantify what is truly definitive. It's probably more appropriate to refer to something as popular if it appeals to a large number of people or occupies a special place in the collective consciousness.
The mini-series with the Phantasm wasn't for me at all, but I actually liked most of the bat/cat stuff he did on the flagship title. Glad you like his more recent stuff, though.I which self-contained stories with no Catwoman were all Tom King wrote Batman-wise because he's weirdly excellent in those.
![]()
![]()
![]()
Luke Evans feels like one we've been overlooking a bit. He's gotten steady franchise work over the past 10 years, he looks the part for a Batman that has a whole Bat-Family, was already in contention for Batman back in the Snyder era. Unless Gunn decides to go ballistic with the height thing and go like he did with Luthor and Superman and end up with shortlists of only over 6'2 actors, I'd be kinda shocked if he didn't end up as one of the finalists screentesting at the very least. For some reason I find him boring, but he feels veeeery plausible. One of the most plausible candidates even.
RDJ was the best actor for sure, but MCU Iron Man is honestly quite a stark contrast to his 616 counterpart. He has his **** together far more than 616 Tony. The Demon in a Bottle stuff is virtually non existent. Reeve was the best actor, during the first time the character had been seen on the big screen and the character itself was written perfectly in accordance with who the character is/was in the comics. As i said, lightning in a bottle that's never been truly emulated or replicatedRDJ as Iron Man.
i'd disagreeBatman is like Bond. There will never be a definitive version.
No thank you.![]()
Matthew Goode is interesting. He was a finalist for both Superman AND Batman back in the Snyder era, kinda the Nic Hoult of his time. I've only ever seen him in Watchmen, can't say I'm a mega fan of the idea or his looks but he is somewhat intriguing.
I love how this thread's inevitable fate is always to end up at the same conclusion: Lee would be the perfect DCU Batman and he's hot as hell.
![]()
![]()
Which is good because much like Hoult, leading man roles don't suit him like the villain types do, imo.
He could be cool as Man-Bat or in the Reevesverse he could play somebody. Don't wanna say Two-Face 'cause that'd be typecasting, but Scarecrow, Professor Pyg, someone like that could be cool for him.He would be a great villain.
Just noticed that Dave Pena aka Film Junkee endorsed Pace for the new Batman.
![]()
some tweets I found that show I’m not the only one that finds him unattractive and a bad choice for Batman. Lee Pace would be horrible and I’m not the only one that thinks this
These are all in response to a Lee Pace Batman fan cast tweet
View attachment 75153
View attachment 75154
View attachment 75155