-- yahoo newsThe White House on Thursday sought to sidestep controversy over the exact circumstances of the raid to kill Osama bin Laden, highlighting instead a "flawlessly" executed and dangerous mission. Officials have declined to give any further details of the raid against the Al-Qaeda leader, after being forced to amend earlier accounts of what exactly happened when Navy SEALS stole deep into Pakistan in a covert action on Sunday.
White House spokesman Jay Carney told reporters on Air Force One that the operation was still being evaluated, but said that after transparently offering details of what happened, Washington was no longer offering public accounts.
Talk about overly dramatic.
"As of February 2010, al-Qa'ida was allegedly contemplating conducting an operation against trains at an unspecified location in the United States on the 10th anniversary of September 11, 2001... As one option, al-Qa'ida was looking into trying to tip a train by tampering with the rails so that the train would fall off the track at either a valley or a bridge. "
Cool
Nevertheless, he and any other President fits the definition of a terrorist, because that's their nature.
Peace
Not really, it's frustrating dealing with ignorant people.
I dont think he'd not kill is wife and kids if it met he could kill more americans
Are you ****ting me? You don't think Osama would commit suicide to take a bunch of americans down with him if he were cornered? That like... the whole basis of what their terrorism is!
TheIncredibleSk said:Yeah Al Qaeda just won't learn until we kill every single high ranking member and show them, you **** with us and you will be destroyed eventually
LOBO3315a said:Can somebody ban this guy? I think he's crossed the line.
Also, I hate to do anything that resembles defending Osama, but just assuming he wouldn't hesitate to kill his wife and kids because he's a terrorist and ALL he wants to do is kill Americans? He's still a human being, capable of basic emotions like fear, survival and quite possibly love. To assume he isn't is just, well, ignorant. He may well have been a monster in that way too, but to just assume it? Sheesh.
I think you are being entirely too defensive. I'm not defending what he said, but it's a political thread. Obama's a politician. People are going to say dumb things about politicians. If you can't handle it, you shouldn't be in the thread. People saying extreme things to try and prove a point that is probably also ludicrous? That IS politics.
He must likely would, but I would think it would make him hesitate at least for a moment and that hesitation could lead to the SEALS non-fatally taking him down.
Oh I know he would, but add a large group of his children into the mix as well as his wife, I dont think he would be as quick to pull the pin, thats my point.
Again, I'm all for killing Bin Laden, and I would piss on his body if it were on solid ground, but something about his demise strikes me as suspicious.
UPDATE: PRESIDENT OBAMA WILL MEET WITH BIN LADEN RAID SPECIAL FORCES MEMBERS ON FRIDAY
http://www.cnn.com/2011/WORLD/asiapcf/05/05/bin.laden.main/index.html?hpt=T2
Yah seriously. The inaccuracy of still-pending events is always pretty rampant. TDKR news anyone?I see what you're saying, I just think you're blowing it way out of proportion due to your need to criticize. It seems pretty natural to me (and most others) that the 24 Hour news cycle can tend to create a lot of inconsistencies while details are slowly trickling in (as more official briefings were conducted, such as the actual SEALS, of course details are going to become more clear), every news station wants to be on top of the story, so they grab at every little tidbit and try to fill in the gaps, claiming they know the story. It's fun having 24 hour news, but this is one of the downsides.

At some point you just gotta laugh at the absurdity. It's how I stay sane.Not really, it's frustrating dealing with ignorant people.

I think the most suspicious part is that the US just barged into Pakistan without any warning. Talk about awkward.Again, I'm all for killing Bin Laden, and I would piss on his body if it were on solid ground, but something about his demise strikes me as suspicious.

Also, I hate to do anything that resembles defending Osama, but just assuming he wouldn't hesitate to kill his wife and kids because he's a terrorist and ALL he wants to do is kill Americans? He's still a human being, capable of basic emotions like fear, survival and quite possibly love. To assume he isn't is just, well, ignorant. He may well have been a monster in that way too, but to just assume it? Sheesh.
I think the most suspicious part is that the US just barged into Pakistan without any warning. Talk about awkward.![]()
I think you are being entirely too defensive. I'm not defending what he said, but it's a political thread. Obama's a politician. People are going to say dumb things about politicians. If you can't handle it, you shouldn't be in the thread. People saying extreme things to try and prove a point that is probably also ludicrous? That IS politics.

You are assuming he hesitated and not made a move for a weapon like was briefed...you are making up situations to prove your way of thinking
Anita18 said:I think the most suspicious part is that the US just barged into Pakistan without any warning. Talk about awkward.
Cool
Nevertheless, he and any other President fits the definition of a terrorist, because that's their nature.
Peace
Judging by Pakistan's seemingly shameful reaction, I'd say it's been more awkward on their part than ours.Yah seriously. The inaccuracy of still-pending events is always pretty rampant. TDKR news anyone?
At some point you just gotta laugh at the absurdity. It's how I stay sane.
Are presidents open to using methods of violence or fear to achieve their agenda? Yes, to a point, but to lump Obama and OBL into the same mold is just ludicrous.
I think the most suspicious part is that the US just barged into Pakistan without any warning. Talk about awkward.![]()
I hesitate to call him a human, but even as a human I think what you're missing is that the guy had a very very very warped idea of what his religion was dictating. When people are vehement about their religion, they would totally sacrifice their kids, wife, and selves. And it sounded like most of his kids were out of the room anyway.
I seem to recall people sacrificing their kids in the bible for gods bidding, you don't think Osama would do the same as a crazy religious fanatic?
No, not at all. In my initial post on this point I stated that a highly trained group of SEALS could probably have taken him down without fatally wounding him, however they were warned of UBL possibly having a suicide vest or some type of weaponry on him so they took him down at the first sign of opposition. My point was when they entered the room and saw a large group of children, I believe UBL wouldn't have been as quick to kill everyone in the room and could have given even a fraction of a second to be non-fatally taken down. Instead, they chose to fatally wound him, as was per orders.